Vieten et al. (2018) [56] |
Future directions in meditation research: Recommendations for expanding the field of contemplative science. |
Design: cross-sectional Aims: to investigate the prevalence of a wide range of experiences. n = 1120 meditators Inclusion Criteria: current or past meditation practice Outcome: MEQ30, Extraordinary experiences |
|
-
•
These aspects of meditation could be crucial to practitioners' psychological & spiritual development
-
•
Could also serve as mediators/mechanisms for conferring benefits.
-
•
They can be subjected to rigorous scientific investigation
|
Munaz et al. (2017) [57] |
The importance of research literacy for yoga therapists. |
Design: perspective |
-
•
Research literacy & evidence-informed practice are essential skills for yoga therapists.
-
•
They should be systematically included in yoga therapy programs.
-
•
Many yoga therapists have limited training in these skills, which negatively impacts inter-professional communication & advancement of yoga research
|
|
Van Dam NT (2018) [17] |
Mind The Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation |
Design: review mindfulness meditation Objectives: to highlight difficulties of defining mindfulness, delineates scope of research into mindfulness practices, & illuminates crucial methodological issues for interpreting results from research of mindfulness |
-
•
Various possible meanings of ‘mindfulness’ need to be clarified
-
•
Researchers must adopt nuanced, precisely focused, terminology for referring to various states/behaviours a/w mindfulness.
-
•
MBR must work on construct validity of the practice.
-
•
Sound methodology e.g., adequate outcome measures, good psychometric properties, trial registration would aid in research
-
•
MBI research needs to have uniform & better control; participants need to be sensitized about the potential ADRs with it.
-
•
Advances in contemplative neuroscience should explore mental processes & brain mechanisms of mindfulness practices & report them properly.
|
|
Davidson & Dahl (2017) [25] |
Outstanding Challenges in Scientific Research on Mindfulness and Meditation |
Design: commentary |
-
•
Methodology issue with the operational definition of the MM or meditation is not unique to MBR but applied to other area of behavioral sciences as well.
-
•
Both self-report measures & implicit behavioral aspects need to be considered in MBR
-
•
Future research needs to expand their horizon to include other family of contemplative practices rather limiting to MBR
-
•
Mindfulness practices have been conceived for attaining a general wellbeing; their utility for various disorders need to be researched contextually
-
•
Greater research is required on the frequency, duration, & spacing of the mindfulness practices & how it can be piggybacked with ADLs for its wider dissemination
-
•
Power of mobile technology can be harnessed in both disseminating contemplative training & its assessment
|
-
•
These issues are germane to both basic & clinical research studies.
-
•
Also, it has important bearing on the future scientific investigation of mindfulness & meditation
|
Davidson & Kaszniak (2015) [26] |
Conceptual & Methodological Issues in Research on Mindfulness & Meditation. |
Design: review |
-
•
State & trait effect of the MM & their interactions along with practitioner's personality & expectations, compliance with the practices must be studied as they are crucial determinants of efficacy
-
•
Many practices are subsumed under MM though the extent of practice differ
-
•
The experiential account of the practitioner can be strengthened by incorporating second & third persons' account
-
•
Challenges are also posed by research designs where double-blinding is not possible: active control, e.g., dual blinding, could evade this limitations.
-
•
Adequate description of the intervention, comparable control arm, credence of the instructors, & fidelity of intervention delivery need to be ensured.
-
•
Similarly, the question of measurability of the mindfulness, what can & cannot be inferred from self-report measures; & utility of contemplative neurosciences are essential.
-
•
Robust study design & data analyses are also crucial.
|
-
•
Mindfulness-based research is still in infancy
-
•
The methodological limitations can be overcome by robust study design.
-
•
Mindfulness-based intervention should be tested both for the clinical and non-clinical population with giving due consideration to its conceptual framework
|
Van Dam NT (2018) [58] |
Reiterated Concerns and Further Challenges for Mindfulness and Meditation Research: A Reply to Davidson and Dahl |
Design: commentary |
-
•
Nascent Scientific Fields, incl. MBR, are especially susceptible to methodological Issues, thus initial findings, or mis-findings, can have huge long-term impacts.
-
•
Meditation can cause adverse S/E; even in a small subset of participants, it can matter a lot
-
•
Impact of MBIs on clinical population should be investigated more thoroughly, for former is not traditionally meant for medical conditions, but general well-being.
-
•
Assessing & establishing dose–response curves of the meditation is crucial
-
•
Its impact must be ascertained based on outcome (e.g., alleviation of anxiety, attaining wellbeing)
-
•
For mobile-based system to deliver MBIs & for their dissemination, much research is warranted to establish fidelity of intervention delivery, analyse participants characteristics, etc.
|
|
Patwardhan AR (2017) [59] |
Aligning Yoga With Its Evolving Role in Health Care: Comments on Yoga Practice, Policy, Research |
Design: commentary |
-
•
Yoga therapists need to calibrate their model of yoga by reducing emphasis on postures & increasing it on meditation & breathing exercises while dealing with clients with chronic health issues.
-
•
Yoga research should be more critical in evaluating yoga's fundamental framework & have reductionist approach.
-
•
Regulatory bodies must extricate injury prone postures from the practice for regulatory purposes, than regulate yoga summarily.
-
•
Insurers should pay for yoga akin to vaccination (paying for initial dose & then booster sessions), this would widen the coverage of yoga & prevent future ill health
|
-
•
There is certain practice, policy, & research related issues concerning yoga, hence, it should be promptly & adequately addressed for yoga to flourish and bring fruition to the population
|
Field T. (2016) [2] |
Yoga Research Review |
Design: review (Of empirical research, systematic reviews and metanalyses) |
-
•
Overall, yoga has been more effective than control, including waitlist control, for several physical & psychological problems, although results are mixed when compared with other treatment arms e.g., exercise
-
•
Having established the benefits of yoga, conducting a research without active control group, thereby not maintaining research equipoise, raises ethical concerns.
-
•
Shorter sessions should be investigated for cost-effectiveness & for ensuring daily practice.
-
•
Multiple physical & physiological measures, particularly objective measures, need to be added to the self-report research protocols.
-
•
Potential underlying mechanisms of effectiveness of the yoga to be explored.
|
-
•
There is literature support for yoga as an effective strategy for several medical and psychological problems
-
•
Such interventions van be termed as yoga therapy
-
•
Such interventions van be termed as yoga therapy
|
Uebelacker et al. (2012) [60] |
Yoga for Depression and Anxiety: A Review of Published Research and Implications for Healthcare Providers |
Design: review |
-
•
Preliminary evidence suggests the effectiveness of yoga for anxiety, depression, & PTSD.
-
•
With evidence being strongest for unipolar depression.
-
•
However, there are risks with engaging with yoga as well.
|
|
Jeter et al. (2015) [29] |
Yoga as a Therapeutic Intervention: A Bibliometric Analysis of Published Research Studies from 1967 to 2013. |
Design: bibliometric analysis of clinical trials based on yoga |
-
•
A three-fold increase in yoga publications in the decade.
-
•
45% are RCTs f/b controlled (18%) & uncontrolled trails (37%)
-
•
Top three disease conditions are mental health, CVDs, & respiratory disease.
-
•
Research suffers from the methodological limitations (e.g., insufficient sample size).
-
•
The research also suffers from publication biases with uncontrolled & poor quality studies getting published in traditional journals.
|
-
•
The use of yoga as a complementary Tt in clinical practice may lead to health benefits beyond traditional Tt alone.
-
•
Determining the suitability & content of yoga for a specific condition/patient poses challenge for evidence-based integrative medical practice
-
•
However, to effect changes in health care policy, greater high-quality, evidence-based research is required.
|
Cook-cottone et al. (2013) [61] |
Dosage as a critical variable in yoga therapy research. |
Design: perspective |
-
•
Considerable variability exists about the optimum dosage/duration of yoga to be effective (range 4–32wks, median 8wks)
-
•
Until empirically meaningful dosages, incl. length & frequency of sessions & longitudinal duration of practice are found, clinical guidelines would be arbitrary
-
•
Home practice contributes substantially to the benefits of yoga practice, which often remains unaccounted
|
-
•
Therapeutic dosage is a critical component of yoga intervention research.
-
•
Empirically supported guidelines are required to establish best practices for research & to create clinical recommendations for effective use
|
Josipovic Z (2010) [22] |
Duality and nonduality in meditation research |
Design: commentary |
-
•
There is a taxonomical concern with the classification of the meditation: FA, OM, & AT types
-
•
A dualistic & non-dualistic classification of meditation for cognitive neurosciences & research is more pragmatic, albeit with some research-related limitations.
-
•
A multidimensional construct involving targeted states of consciousness; duality to nonduality scale; stages of expertise; cognitive processes; & objects of meditation is better
-
•
There is an overlap among the different meditation types concerning EEG changes.
-
•
Hence, formers' utility in meditation categorization needs to be further studied
|
|
Park et al. (2015) [62] |
Comparison groups in yoga research: a systematic review and critical evaluation of the literature |
Design: systematic review |
-
•
n = 128 RCTs
-
•
65 included only a passive control while 63 included at least one active comparator
-
•
Primary comparison groups: physical exercise (43%), meditation/relaxation (20%), & general education (16%)
-
•
Literature rarely provides the rationale for the choice of the a particular comparator
-
•
Notably, use of active controls in yoga research seems to be gradually increasing over time
|
-
•
Considering that yoga has been established as a potentially effective intervention, future research should endeavour having active control groups
-
•
Furthermore, care is needed to select a robust comparison conditions that help to identify the specific mechanisms underlying yoga's effects
|
Goyal et al. (2014) [3] |
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
Design: systematic review & Meta-analysis |
-
•
n = 47 trials with 3515 participants
-
•
MM programs had moderate level of evidence for improving anxiety, depression, & pain at 8 weeks to 3–6 months.
-
•
Low evidence of improved stress/distress & mental health–related quality of life
-
•
No effect or insufficient evidence of any effect on positive mood, attention, substance use, eating habits, sleep, & weight
-
•
Meditation programs did not fare better than drugs, exercises, & other behaviour Therapy
|
-
•
Clinicians ought be prepared to convey their patients about the potential role of the meditation program could have in addressing their psychological stress.
-
•
Robust study designs are required to elucidate the impact of meditation programs in improving the positive dimensions of psychological health and measures of stress.
|
Sedlmeier et al. (2012) [16] |
The psychological effects of meditation: a meta-analysis |
Design: systematic review & Meta-analysis |
-
•
Majority of the studies were excluded d/t methodological issues
-
•
Most studies were conducted without theoretical background
-
•
Mediation-based interventions had moderate effect sizes
-
•
Results were strongest (medium-large) for changes in emotionality & relationship problems, less strong (medium) for measures of attention, & weakest (small-medium) for cognitive measures.
|
|
Awasthi B. (2013) [14] |
Issues and Perspectives in Meditation Research: In Search for a Definition |
Design: commentary |
-
•
A wide array of techniques & methods are collectively termed as “meditation” with mixed and at times conflicting findings reported within the contemplative neurosciences
-
•
There is the lack of philosophical grounding for the neuroscience of meditation.
-
•
For instance, modern neurosciences considers it in light of mind-body dichotomy, however, traditional meditation ontology sees it as non-dual entity.
-
•
Lack of sound definition results in methodological limitations, including replication of the studies.
-
•
Also, results in non-elucidation of its mechanism of action for neuro-cognitive-behavioural changes.
|
-
•
Paying due attention to the contextual & inception of meditation traditions is vital
-
•
1st person methodologies should be integrated with the 3rd person methodologies of neurosciences
-
•
Specific outcome measures should be assessed for the different phases & types of the meditation
-
•
An integration of traditional ontology, 1st person phenomenological accounts & neuroscientific findings will facilitate the development of more comprehensive models of the mind for neurocognitive research with the contemplative traditions.
|
Davidson RJ (2010) [15] |
Empirical explorations of mindfulness: Conceptual and methodological conundrums |
Design: commentary |
-
•
The use of the term “mindfulness” has varied substantially across the articles, ranging being a state to trait to an independent variable
-
•
Measures of the mindfulness, duration, and adequate comparison group related issues have been the consistent methodological concerns
|
|
Larkey L. (2021) [40] |
Meditative Movement as a Category of Exercise: Implications for Research |
Design: review (on Meditative Movement e.g., Tai-chi, Qigong, etc.) |
-
•
Relevant dimensions of Meditative Movement, e.g., frequency, duration, type of movement, degree of exertion, breathing type, etc. are recommended to be succinctly described & measured.
-
•
To consistently define the category across studies & illuminate how Meditative Movement may affect health outcomes in similar, & perhaps different, ways than conventional exercise.
|
|
Lustyk et al. (2009) [37] |
Mindfulness meditation research: issues of participant screening, safety procedures, and researcher training |
Design: review |
-
•
Mental health- followed by physical & spiritual health consequences are common S/E with MM.
-
•
Despite this, most research do not describe, or even consider them.
-
•
Research participants/patients should be thoroughly medically examined before enrolling in MBI
|
|
Grossman P. (2008) [41] |
On measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research |
Design: commentary |
-
•
Definition of mindfulness has been varied across the studies.
-
•
Denominator of “present-moment awareness of perceptible experience” might, at first consideration, seem feasible; but suffers from reductionism
-
•
The inventories used to measure mindfulness vary substantially, therefore, there is a poor correlation among them
-
•
The measuring instruments also suffer from semantic confusion
-
•
Valid & reliable instrument are lacking that would objectively measure the mindfulness.
-
•
Mindfulness inventories may be hampered by serious limitations of construct validity
|
-
•
Qualitative analysis of the experiences of the Buddhist & western practitioners of mindfulness & putative consequences (e.g., general wellbeing) of MM can assist in measuring the level of mindfulness
-
•
It must be appreciated that Buddhist & Western approaches to mind & body differ substantially, thus study of mindfulness- & based intervention should be understood in its traditional framework.
|
Travis et al. (2010) [21] |
Focused attention, open monitoring and automatic self-transcending: Categories to organize meditations from Vedic, Buddhist and Chinese traditions |
Study design:perspective
|
-
•
Each of the three meditation-categories-focused attention, open monitoring, & aut. self-transcending- represents practices with different degrees of attention control, subject/object relations, & different procedures
-
•
However, TM technique, the most researched of the aut. self-transcending procedures, is often placed under FA
|
|