Table 2.
Comparison results of optimization for four objective functions.
| Objective function | Delay reduction ratio (%) | Energy consumption reduction ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|
| ω t = 0.4 | 1.25 | 23.29 |
| ω t = 0.6 | 1.97 | 21.16 |
| ω t = 0.8 | 2.03 | 19.98 |
| Formula (13) | 2.58 | 30.67 |
Comparison results of optimization for four objective functions.
| Objective function | Delay reduction ratio (%) | Energy consumption reduction ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|
| ω t = 0.4 | 1.25 | 23.29 |
| ω t = 0.6 | 1.97 | 21.16 |
| ω t = 0.8 | 2.03 | 19.98 |
| Formula (13) | 2.58 | 30.67 |