Table 3.

Estimated Relative Risk Ratios for Prepandemic Confidant Network Predicting Pandemic Support From Multinomial Logistic Models With Gender Interactions (N = 2,622)

	Help		Help frequency		Support		Support frequency
	Yes	Unable to get	Less often	More often	Yes	Unable to get	Less often	More often
	vs. no need	vs. no need	vs. same	vs. same	vs. no need	vs. no need	vs. same	vs. same
Confidant networks
Size	1.20+	0.82	0.93	1.22*	1.23***	1.42+	1.06	1.21+
	(0.11)	(0.11)	(0.09)	(0.11)	(0.07)	(0.27)	(0.10)	(0.12)
Size × Female	1.07	0.99	1.20	0.95	0.97	0.85	0.90	0.93
	(0.11)	(0.18)	(0.17)	(0.12)	(0.08)	(0.25)	(0.12)	(0.12)
Density	3.06*	0.92	0.91	2.02	1.35	0.61	0.81	1.16
	(1.45)	(0.78)	(0.46)	(1.16)	(0.37)	(0.42)	(0.33)	(0.52)
Density × Female	0.78	2.13	1.01	0.67	1.44	2.30	1.43	1.31
	(0.47)	(2.25)	(0.61)	(0.51)	(0.67)	(2.64)	(0.76)	(0.80)
% Female confidant	1.06	1.39	0.72	0.80	1.20	8.17+	0.67	0.58
	(0.33)	(1.34)	(0.41)	(0.50)	(0.39)	(8.77)	(0.33)	(0.32)
% Female confidant × Female	0.93	0.63	1.00	1.51	1.10	0.06*	1.13	1.85
	(0.48)	(0.85)	(0.78)	(1.24)	(0.42)	(0.07)	(0.80)	(1.38)
% Kin confidant	0.91	1.21	1.38	1.21	1.22	0.85	1.45	1.62
	(0.32)	(1.10)	(0.77)	(0.66)	(0.35)	(0.65)	(0.67)	(0.73)
% Kin confidant × Female	1.28	0.24	0.91	1.02	0.71	0.67	0.55	0.57
	(0.66)	(0.24)	(0.59)	(0.79)	(0.31)	(0.75)	(0.31)	(0.34)
Female	1.79***	1.13	1.24	1.51*	1.53***	1.02	0.93	1.85**
	(0.23)	(0.42)	(0.27)	(0.29)	(0.14)	(0.36)	(0.19)	(0.34)

Notes: SE in parentheses. All models controlled for race, age, education, current marital status as well as Round 3 measures of self-rated physical health, self-rated mental health, rely on family, and rely on friends.

***p < .001, **p < .01, * p < .05, ⁺p < .10.