Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 25;9:974367. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.974367

TABLE 2.

Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the associations of phytosterol intake with overall survival among 703 ovarian cancer patients*.

Characteristics Tertiles of intake (mg/d)** P trend Continuous
Total phytosterols < 43.10 43.10–61.55 ≥ 61.55
Deaths, N (% of total deaths) 51 (39.23) 34 (26.15) 45 (34.62)
Model 1 1.00 (Ref) 0.59 (0.38–0.92) 0.73 (0.49–1.09) 0.18 0.84 (0.70–1.00)
Model 2 1.00 (Ref) 0.56 (0.36–0.88) 0.71 (0.47–1.06) 0.14 0.83 (0.69–1.00)
Model 3 1.00 (Ref) 0.49 (0.31–0.79) 0.64 (0.40–1.03) 0.11 0.76 (0.59–0.97)
Campestanol < 0.35 0.35–0.56 ≥ 0.56
Deaths, N (% of total deaths) 46 (35.38) 42 (32.31) 42 (32.31)
Model 1 1.00 (Ref) 0.90 (0.59–1.38) 0.86 (0.56–1.30) 0.49 0.90 (0.76–1.08)
Model 2 1.00 (Ref) 0.78 (0.51–1.20) 0.80 (0.52–1.23) 0.38 0.89 (0.73–1.07)
Model 3 1.00 (Ref) 0.73 (0.46–1.16) 0.70 (0.38–1.30) 0.31 0.77 (0.51–1.16)
β -Sitostanol < 2.04 2.04–2.95 ≥ 2.95
Deaths, N (% of total deaths) 52 (40.00) 32 (24.62) 46 (35.38)
Model 1 1.00 (Ref) 0.58 (0.37–0.91) 0.77 (0.52–1.15) 0.30 0.87 (0.72–1.04)
Model 2 1.00 (Ref) 0.55 (0.35–0.86) 0.77 (0.52–1.15) 0.32 0.86 (0.71–1.03)
Model 3 1.00 (Ref) 0.48 (0.30–0.76) 0.65 (0.39–1.09) 0.16 0.72 (0.54–0.96)
Campesterol < 5.13 5.13–7.51 ≥ 7.51
Deaths, N (% of total deaths) 53 (40.77) 33 (25.38) 44 (33.85)
Model 1 1.00 (Ref) 0.55 (0.36–0.87) 0.69 (0.46–1.03) 0.11 0.85 (0.71–1.01)
Model 2 1.00 (Ref) 0.51 (0.33–0.81) 0.64 (0.43–0.97) 0.06 0.84 (0.70–1.00)
Model 3 1.00 (Ref) 0.52 (0.33–0.83) 0.54 (0.31–0.94) < 0.05 0.67 (0.47–0.94)
Stigmasterol < 5.84 5.84–8.26 ≥ 8.26
Deaths, N (% of total deaths) 52 (40.00) 36 (27.69) 42 (32.31)
Model 1 1.00 (Ref) 0.68 (0.44–1.05) 0.72 (0.48–1.08) 0.14 0.81 (0.68–0.97)
Model 2 1.00 (Ref) 0.60 (0.39–0.94) 0.67 (0.44–1.02) 0.09 0.79 (0.66–0.96)
Model 3 1.00 (Ref) 0.53 (0.33–0.84) 0.60 (0.37–0.98) 0.07 0.69 (0.53–0.90)
ß-Sitosterol < 30.54 30.54–43.18 ≥ 43.18
Deaths, N (% of total deaths) 51 (39.23) 36 (27.69) 43 (33.08)
Model 1 1.00 (Ref) 0.66 (0.43–1.02) 0.67 (0.45–1.01) 0.07 0.84 (0.70–1.01)
Model 2 1.00 (Ref) 0.66 (0.43–1.02) 0.67 (0.44–1.01) 0.07 0.83 (0.69–1.00)
Model 3 1.00 (Ref) 0.61 (0.39–0.97) 0.63 (0.40–0.99) 0.06 0.79 (0.63–0.99)

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; Ref, reference.

*Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI were calculated through the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

**Adjusted for energy by the residual method.

Test for trend based on variables containing the median value for each group.

Continuous intakes were calculated by per standard deviation increase.

Model 1 was adjusted for age at diagnosis (< 50 or ≥ 50 years) and total energy (continuous, kcal/day).

Model 2 same as Model 1 and further adjusted for education (junior secondary or below, senior high school/technical secondary school, and junior college/university or above), cigarette smoking (yes or no), alcohol drinking (yes or no), monthly household income (< 5, 5–10, ≥ 10 RMB; thousand yuan), dietary change (yes or no), menopausal status (yes or no), parity (≤ 1, ≥ 2), body mass index (continuous, kg/m2), and physical activity (continuous, MET/hours/day).

Model 3 same as Model 2 and further adjusted for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (I–II, III–IV, and unknown), histological type (serous or non-serous), histopathologic grade (well, moderate, and poorly differentiated), residual lesions (none, < 1, and ≥ 1 cm), and comorbidities (yes or no), isoflavone (continuous, mg/day), and monounsaturated fatty acid intake (continuous, g/day).