Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 7;9(2):lsac023. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsac023

Table 4.

Ethicolegal issues identified and resulting recommendations

Issue Ethicolegal recommendation Action item
Court reliance on physician testimony Expert allyship Proactive involvement of physicians throughout IPV–BI screening. Ensure physicians are aware of all information and willing to advocate in court if necessary.
Lack of informed IPV and BI advocacy for women Establish trauma-informed legal team Connect participants to legal professionals educated in IPV, IPV–BI, and trauma-informed legal practices.
Interpretation of BI and its impact on parenting capacity Assessment of parenting capacity Include an assessment of a BI in evaluating parenting capacity with IPV–BI screening tools and resulting reports.
Possible indirect harms of participation Transparency and the right to opt-out Prioritize transparency before and throughout the screening process to ensure participants know the potential legal implications of screening and diagnostic results and understand their right to opt-out.