Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 25;14:952038. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.952038

TABLE 2.

Difference among Day1, Day2,and Day5 time points for serum MMP-9 and BNDF levels for AIS patients in the good and poor prognosis groups.

MMP-9 (ng/mL)
BDNF (ng/mL)
Day1 Day2 Day5 Day1 Day2 Day5
Good prognosis (n = 24) 67.22 ± 19.72 62.75 ± 20.67 55.23 ± 18.11 4.64 ± 3.32 6.22 ± 2.72 8.55 ± 2.90
Poor prognosis (n = 18) 72.93 ± 21.80 75.23 ± 22.50 79.82 ± 20.55ΔΔ 7.24 ± 1.70ΔΔ 5.77 ± 3.11 4.32 ± 3.42ΔΔ
Groups effect F = 5.258, P = 0.027, η2P = 0.116 F = 0.618, P = 0.436, η2P = 0.015
Time effect F = 2.236, P = 0.113, η2P = 0.053 F = 3.428, P = 0.049, η2P = 0.079
Interaction F = 31.244, P < 0.001, η2P = 0.439 F = 133.954, P < 0.001, η2P = 0.770

Data represent as mean ± SD, P-values denote a significant difference between groups determined by one-way ANOVA, while “ΔΔ” denotes a significant difference compared with the good prognosis group under simple-effect analysis (ΔΔP ≤ 0.01).