Table 1.
Cardiology Domain | Diagnostic modality/type of data used | Author/Study name | Study application | Study conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|
Preventive Cardiology | MERC model in NORIN-STEMI patients | Shetty et al4/NORIN-STEMI | Risk prediction following STEMI | ML models - improved mortality prediction following STEMI compared to traditional logistic regression (Extra Tree ML model best predictive ability -sensitivity: 85%, AUC: 79.7%, and Accuracy: 75%) |
Praise score in ACS patients | D'Ascenzo et al.5 | ML model to predict all-cause death, recurrent acute myocardial infarction, and major bleeding after ACS | PRAISE score - accurate discriminative capabilities for prediction of all-cause death, myocardial infarction and major bleeding | |
Diagnostic CV Imaging | Echocardiography | Madani et al.8 | Identification of echocardiographic views | CNN model distinguished between 15 standard echocardiographic views – accuracy: 97.8% |
Cardiac CT- CCTA | Zhang et al.9 | Fully automated echocardiogram interpretation and detection of selected clinical condition | CNN model detected multiple clinical conditions (cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis and PAH - C statistics of 0.93, 0.87 and 0.85, respectively) | |
Cardiac CT-FFR | Lin A et al.13 | Develop and validate a deep learning system for CCTA-derived measures of plaque volume and stenosis severity | Deep learning system -rapid measurements of plaque volume and stenosis severity from CCTA | |
CMR | Morais et al.14 | Evaluate diagnostic performance of CT-FFR for detection of significant CAD in contrast to invasive FFR | ML-based CT-FFR: good diagnostic performance for detection of CAD | |
Bai et al.15 | Segmentation of heart structures, automatic measurement of LV end-diastolic volume and other values | CNN model - able to perform highly accurate automatic measurements and delineation of heart structures | ||
Wang et al.16 | AI Based CMR Assessment of Biventricular Function | Good agreement between automated and expert-derived LVEF | ||
Electrocardiography | Arrhythmia classification | Hannun et al.19 | Automated arrhythmia classification | Classified 12 different arrhythmias with an average AUC of 0.97 and an F1 score of 0.84, exceeding that of an average cardiologist (0.78) |
AF detection | Attia ZI et al.20 | Detection of paroxysmal AF based on 10 s recording of 12-lead ECG taken in sinus rhythm | AI-enabled ECG acquired during normal sinus rhythm permits AF detection | |
Asymptomatic LV dysfunction | Attia et al.21 | Detection of asymptomatic LV dysfunction from ECG | Detected LV dysfunction- AUC of 0.93 | |
HRV | Shah B et al.22 | Evaluate an AI model to identify time domain HRV measures in COVID-19 recovered subjects | AI model was able to distinguish between COVID-19 recovered patients and healthy controls based on HRV | |
AF detection | Perez et al.23 | Smartwatch identification of AF | Participants receiving notification of an irregular pulse: 34% had AF on subsequent ECG patch readings and 84% of notifications were concordant with AF | |
Heart Failure | Artificial Intelligence-Clinical Decision Support System for HF diagnosis | Choi et al.25 | Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an AI-CDSS for heart failure | AI-CDSS - high diagnostic accuracy for HF: concordance rate between AI-CDSS and heart failure specialists - 98% |
AI algorithm applied to a single-lead ECG recorded during ECG-enabled stethoscope examination | Bachtiger P et al,26 | Validate a potential point-of-care screening tool (ECG-enabled stethoscope) for LVEF of 40% or lower | AI-ECG-enabled stethoscope can detect LVEF of ≤40% with good accuracy- AUROC: 0·91, sensitivity: 91·9% and specificity: 80·2% | |
Predicting response to therapy (CRT) | AI-ECG, | Predicting CRT outcomes | Predicted death or HF hospitalization within 12 months - AUC of 0.74 | |
Novel characterization of HF phenogroups | Kalscheur et al.27 | Predicting CRT outcomes | Predicted echocardiographic CRT response better than current guidelines (AUC: 0.70 vs. 0.65) - greater discrimination of long-term survival (c-index: 0.61 vs. 0.56) | |
Feeny et al.28 | Heart failure phenogroups in CRT | Four phenogroups identified with significantly different clinical and echocardiographic characteristics - two phenogroups substantially better treatment response to CRT therapy | ||
Cikes et al.29 | ||||
Interventional Cardiology | IFR | Davies J.30 CEREBRIA-1 | Comparison of AI with human intelligence for interpretation of IFR pullback data in stable CAD | ML algorithms were non-inferior to expert consensus opinion in determining both appropriateness for PCI as well as optimal PCI strategy |
FFR | Rougin A et al.31 | Feasibility of AI based FFR (Autocath FFR) for prediction of hemodynamically significant lesions based on cineangiography images | Autocath FFR has excellent accuracy in prediction of wire based FFR |
Abbreviations: ACS: acute coronary syndrome; AF: atrial fibrillation; AI: artificial intelligence; AI-CDSS: Artificial Intelligence-Clinical Decision Support System; AUC: area under the curve; CAD: coronary artery disease; CNN: convoluted neural network; CMR: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; CRT: cardiac resynchronization therapy; CV: cardiovascular; CT: computed tomography; CCTA: Coronary computed tomography angiography; ECG: electrovcardiogram; FFR: fractional flow reserve; HF: heart failure; HRV: heart rate variability; IFR: instantaneous wave free ratio; LV: left ventricle; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; ML: machine learning; North India ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NORIN-STEMI); STEMI: ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.