Skip to main content
editorial
. 2022 Jul 30;74(4):265–269. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.07.004

Table 1.

Summary of the studies involving Artificial Intelligence in cardiology.

Cardiology Domain Diagnostic modality/type of data used Author/Study name Study application Study conclusion
Preventive Cardiology MERC model in NORIN-STEMI patients Shetty et al4/NORIN-STEMI Risk prediction following STEMI ML models - improved mortality prediction following STEMI compared to traditional logistic regression (Extra Tree ML model best predictive ability -sensitivity: 85%, AUC: 79.7%, and Accuracy: 75%)
Praise score in ACS patients D'Ascenzo et al.5 ML model to predict all-cause death, recurrent acute myocardial infarction, and major bleeding after ACS PRAISE score - accurate discriminative capabilities for prediction of all-cause death, myocardial infarction and major bleeding
Diagnostic CV Imaging Echocardiography Madani et al.8 Identification of echocardiographic views CNN model distinguished between 15 standard echocardiographic views – accuracy: 97.8%
Cardiac CT- CCTA Zhang et al.9 Fully automated echocardiogram interpretation and detection of selected clinical condition CNN model detected multiple clinical conditions (cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis and PAH - C statistics of 0.93, 0.87 and 0.85, respectively)
Cardiac CT-FFR Lin A et al.13 Develop and validate a deep learning system for CCTA-derived measures of plaque volume and stenosis severity Deep learning system -rapid measurements of plaque volume and stenosis severity from CCTA
CMR Morais et al.14 Evaluate diagnostic performance of CT-FFR for detection of significant CAD in contrast to invasive FFR ML-based CT-FFR: good diagnostic performance for detection of CAD
Bai et al.15 Segmentation of heart structures, automatic measurement of LV end-diastolic volume and other values CNN model - able to perform highly accurate automatic measurements and delineation of heart structures
Wang et al.16 AI Based CMR Assessment of Biventricular Function Good agreement between automated and expert-derived LVEF
Electrocardiography Arrhythmia classification Hannun et al.19 Automated arrhythmia classification Classified 12 different arrhythmias with an average AUC of 0.97 and an F1 score of 0.84, exceeding that of an average cardiologist (0.78)
AF detection Attia ZI et al.20 Detection of paroxysmal AF based on 10 s recording of 12-lead ECG taken in sinus rhythm AI-enabled ECG acquired during normal sinus rhythm permits AF detection
Asymptomatic LV dysfunction Attia et al.21 Detection of asymptomatic LV dysfunction from ECG Detected LV dysfunction- AUC of 0.93
HRV Shah B et al.22 Evaluate an AI model to identify time domain HRV measures in COVID-19 recovered subjects AI model was able to distinguish between COVID-19 recovered patients and healthy controls based on HRV
AF detection Perez et al.23 Smartwatch identification of AF Participants receiving notification of an irregular pulse: 34% had AF on subsequent ECG patch readings and 84% of notifications were concordant with AF
Heart Failure Artificial Intelligence-Clinical Decision Support System for HF diagnosis Choi et al.25 Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an AI-CDSS for heart failure AI-CDSS - high diagnostic accuracy for HF: concordance rate between AI-CDSS and heart failure specialists - 98%
AI algorithm applied to a single-lead ECG recorded during ECG-enabled stethoscope examination Bachtiger P et al,26 Validate a potential point-of-care screening tool (ECG-enabled stethoscope) for LVEF of 40% or lower AI-ECG-enabled stethoscope can detect LVEF of ≤40% with good accuracy- AUROC: 0·91, sensitivity: 91·9% and specificity: 80·2%
Predicting response to therapy (CRT) AI-ECG, Predicting CRT outcomes Predicted death or HF hospitalization within 12 months - AUC of 0.74
Novel characterization of HF phenogroups Kalscheur et al.27 Predicting CRT outcomes Predicted echocardiographic CRT response better than current guidelines (AUC: 0.70 vs. 0.65) - greater discrimination of long-term survival (c-index: 0.61 vs. 0.56)
Feeny et al.28 Heart failure phenogroups in CRT Four phenogroups identified with significantly different clinical and echocardiographic characteristics - two phenogroups substantially better treatment response to CRT therapy
Cikes et al.29
Interventional Cardiology IFR Davies J.30 CEREBRIA-1 Comparison of AI with human intelligence for interpretation of IFR pullback data in stable CAD ML algorithms were non-inferior to expert consensus opinion in determining both appropriateness for PCI as well as optimal PCI strategy
FFR Rougin A et al.31 Feasibility of AI based FFR (Autocath FFR) for prediction of hemodynamically significant lesions based on cineangiography images Autocath FFR has excellent accuracy in prediction of wire based FFR

Abbreviations: ACS: acute coronary syndrome; AF: atrial fibrillation; AI: artificial intelligence; AI-CDSS: Artificial Intelligence-Clinical Decision Support System; AUC: area under the curve; CAD: coronary artery disease; CNN: convoluted neural network; CMR: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; CRT: cardiac resynchronization therapy; CV: cardiovascular; CT: computed tomography; CCTA: Coronary computed tomography angiography; ECG: electrovcardiogram; FFR: fractional flow reserve; HF: heart failure; HRV: heart rate variability; IFR: instantaneous wave free ratio; LV: left ventricle; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; ML: machine learning; North India ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NORIN-STEMI); STEMI: ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.