Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 25;13:998817. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.998817

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The phenotype of A165 and A281 inoculated with R. solanacearum HA4-1 by the cutting leaf method. (A) Disease symptoms of A165 and A281 inoculated with HA4-1 at 13 dpi and 20 dpi. Bar = 5 cm. (B) Disease index of A165 and A281 inoculated with HA4-1 and ΔhrpB mutant (mean ± SE). (C) Survival analysis of A165 and A281 inoculated with HA4-1 and ΔhrpB mutant (****p < 0.0001, “ns” means no significant difference). (D) R. solanacearum populations in leaf tissues of A165 and A281 inoculated with HA4-1 and ΔhrpB mutant. Different lowercases indicate significant differences according to ANOVA (mean ± SE, p < 0.05). (E) Electrolyte leakage in leaf tissues of A165 and A281 inoculated with HA4-1 and ΔhrpB mutant. The asterisks indicate significant differences between A165 and A281 according to Student’s t-test (mean ± SE, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).