Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 25;10:950870. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.950870

Table 7.

Decomposition of child obesity differences due to characteristic endowment.

Panel A: Reference group (Urban children) Panel B: Reference group (Left-behind children)
vs. Comparison group (rural children) vs. Comparison group (non-left-behind children)
C Pct. (%) C Pct. (%)
Overall difference −0.0353(0.000) 100 0.0005(0.902) 100
Explainable differences −0.0212(0.000) 60.10 0.0089(0.000) 1644.70
Unexplained differences −0.0141(0.010) 39.90 −0.0083(0.095) −1544.70
Due to Difference in Characteristics
Grandchild care −0.0005(0.003) 1.42 0.0088(0.000) 1633.16
Public medical insurance −0.0001(0.025) 0.32 −0.0003(0.250) −63.79
Commercial medical insurance −0.0006(0.455) 1.69 0.0015(0.062) 269.43
Medical utilization 0.0002(0.003) −0.61 −0.0015(0.000) −280.39
Age 0.0005(0.000) −1.51 −0.0113(0.002) −2093.15
Age-square −0.0002(0.149) 0.69 −0.0047(0.322) −871.74
Gender −0.0001(0.000) 0.32 −0.0001(0.005) −21.15
Income −0.0030(0.139) 8.40 0.0027(0.002) 497.75
Education −0.0133(0.000) 37.72 0.0095(0.000) 1753.93
Middle area 0.0002(0.407) −0.56 −0.0002(0.792) −43.99
Western area −0.0050(0.004) 14.16 0.0019(0.000) 351.23

The results related to the coefficient effect (unexplainable part) are not listed.