Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 18;15(9):1511–1519. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.09.15

Table 1. Study characteristics of the included studies.

Study Design Disease Gender (M/F)
Age (y)
Eyes (n)
Intervention
Follow-up (mo) NOS
IDI IVA IDI IVA IDI IVA IDI IVA
Aksoy 2020[17] Retrospective cohort study DR 18/19 18/16 61.3±11.3 59.3±10.3 37 34 0.7 mg at baseline 3 injections/mo (2 mg) 6 6
Bolukbasi 2019[18] Retrospective cohort study DR 9/16 13/19 65.1±13.2 56.4±13.5 25 32 0.7 mg at baseline 3 injections/mo (2 mg) 3 5
Comet 2021[19] Non-RCT DR 12/9 11/9 66.3±7.8 69.6±9.2 21 20 0.7 mg +PRN 3 injections/mo (2 mg)+ PRN 12 N/A
Hanhart 2017[20] Retrospective cohort study RVO 6/4 6/6 63.60±7.12 62.08±8.87 10 12 NA NA 12 7
Kaldirim2018[21] Retrospective cohort study RVO 12/8 13/7 70.6±3.9 70.45±3.9 20 20 0.7 mg at baseline 3 injections/mo (2 mg)+ PRN 6 6
Ozsaygili 2020[22] RCT DR 15/14 20/13 64.8±7.9 66.4±2.0 48 50 0.7 mg +PRN 3 injections/mo (2 mg)+ PRN 12 N/A
Yucel 2019[23] Retrospective cohort study RVO NA NA 65.4±2.3 66.2±3.2 24 16 PRN (0.7 mg) PRN (2 mg) 6 6

M: Male; F: Female; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; DR: Diabetic retinopathy; RVO: Retinal vein occlusion; IDI: Intravitreal dexamethasone implant; IVA: Intravitreal aflibercept; NA: Not applicable; NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa scale; PRN: pro re nata.