Skip to main content
. 2022 May 11;60(4):360–370. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2022-0012

Table 2. The relationship between gig work experience and occupational injury according to main occupation.

Main occupation Gig work experience in the last year No gig work experience


Number of workers Any minor injury Activity-limiting injury Number of workers Any minor injury Activity-limiting injury



n n incidence* n incidence* n n incidence* n incidence*
Professional and engineering 108 24 22.2 12 11.1 3,088 256 8.3 53 1.7
Clerk 107 31 29.0 20 18.7 3,837 196 5.1 57 1.5
Shop and market sale 88 23 26.1 15 17.0 2,126 165 7.8 31 1.5
Service 69 31 44.9 25 36.2 1,483 189 12.7 33 2.2
Security 2 0 0.0 0 0.0 256 23 9.0 7 2.7
Manufacturing process 38 10 26.3 6 15.8 1,611 209 13.0 29 1.8
Transport and machine operation 15 6 40.0 0 0.0 388 37 9.5 9 2.3
Construction and mining 5 4 80.0 0 0.0 370 76 20.5 15 4.1
Carrying, cleaning, packaging 14 5 35.7 1 7.1 664 124 18.7 32 4.8
Else 144 30 20.8 22 15.3 3,545 328 9.3 83 2.3

Total 590 164 27.8 101 17.1 17,368 1,603 9.2 349 2.0

* Incedence rate of injury in each main occupation per 100 person

The prevalence of main occupations were significantly different between worker with and withought gig work experience (p<0.001,Chi-square test).

▽: statistically significant lower than expected value by residual analysis

▲: statistically significant higher than expected value by residual analysis

The numbers on this Table were adjusted using inverse probability weighting.