| Okon
et al.10
|
Rice husk |
20 g per 350 mL |
Reduced the fluid loss 64.89%
compared to PAC (59.57%) and CMC (62.77%), mud cake thickness of 3.2 mm |
| Hossain and Wajheeuddin11
|
Grass |
0.75 ppb in drilling fluid (300 μm) |
25% filtration loss control |
| Dagde and Nmegbu12
|
Cellulose
processed from
groundnut husk |
4.0 g |
Fluid loss 6.5 m/s with
maximum percentage deviation of −0.02% compared to PAC |
| Amanullah et
al.13
|
Date seed powder (DSP) |
6 g |
Spurt reduction by 40% compared
to clay-free starch contain drilling mud and HPHT fluid loss reduction
by 60%. |
| Sharma and Vikas14
|
Tamarind gum and tragacanth |
0.1% PAC and 0.2% Tamarind
Gum |
API filter press
reduction
of 12 mL and 21.40 mDarcy |
| Nmegbu and Bari-Agara1
|
Corn cob |
2 g |
5.2 to 5.6 m/s
lower fluid
loss |
| Davoodi
et al.15
|
Pistachio shell powder (PSP) |
9 g of PSP-1 in 350 mL |
Efficiency with
44% fluid
loss reduction and the highest value of plastic viscosity, yield point,
and gel strength |
| Al-saba et al.6
|
Among 20 waste materials
soya bean peel was most efficient |
2 ppb |
Reduced the fluid loss up
to 60% and enhanced yield point 330% and gel strength 640% |
| Ragab and Noah8
|
Nanosilica |
20–30 wt % |
Reduced up to 56% of the
fluid loss compared to ordinary drilling fluids |
| Vryzas and
Kelessidis16
|
Iron oxide (Fe2O3) |
0.5 w/w % |
Maximum reduction in filtration
loss, which was 42.5% in comparison to the base fluid alone |
| Silica nanoparticles |
0.5% and 1.5% (w/w) |
Increases of filtration
volume 54.1% and 46.8% were observed, respectively |
| Ismail9
|
Nanosilica |
0.01 g |
The temperature
of 200 °F
provided 6.5 mL fluid loss, which was the lowest. |
| Mahmoud et al.17
|
Ferric oxide |
0.5
wt % |
The best improvement
by
reducing the filtrate volume by 42.7% compared to the base fluid |
