Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2022 Aug 24;7(35):31466–31473. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03990

Influence of the Synthesis Conditions on the Morphology and Thermometric Properties of the Lifetime-Based Luminescent Thermometers in YPO4:Yb3+,Nd3+ Nanocrystals

Kamila Maciejewska 1, Lukasz Marciniak 1,*
PMCID: PMC9453944  PMID: 36092587

Abstract

graphic file with name ao2c03990_0008.jpg

An increase in the accuracy of remote temperature readout using luminescent thermometry is determined, among other things, by the relative sensitivity of the thermometer. Therefore, to increase the sensitivity, intensive work is carried out to optimize the host material composition and select the luminescent ions accordingly. However, the role of nanocrystal morphology in thermometric performance is often neglected. This paper presents a systematic study determining the role of synthesis parameters of the solvothermal method on the morphology of YPO4:Yb3+,Nd3+ nanocrystals and their effect on the lifetime of Yb3+ ion-based luminescent thermometer performance. It was shown that by changing the RE3+:(PO4)3– ratio and the concentration of Nd3+ ions, the size, shape, and aggregation level of the nanocrystals can be modified changing the thermometric parameters of the luminescent thermometer. The highest relative sensitivity was obtained for the low RE3+:(PO4)3– ratio and 1% Nd3+ ion concentration.

1. Introduction

Materials that exhibit emission of electromagnetic radiation under nonthermal stimuli called phosphors are commonly used primarily in the lighting industry.14 However, in recent years, they have been increasingly used in many, much more demanding applications. One of the most interesting is the exploitation of luminescence for remote sensing of physical or chemical quantities of the medium in which they are located, including luminescence thermometers, manometers, pH meters, etc.510 Among these techniques, luminescence thermometry is undoubtedly the most strongly developed.1119 It enables remote readout of temperature by analyzing spectroscopic properties of phosphor. Although the ratiometric approach is the most popular noncontact temperature sensing technique described in the literature, the reliability and accuracy of the temperature readout are significantly limited by the fact that the ratio of the intensity of the two bands can be modified by the medium in which the phosphor is located.17,20

Therefore, an important alternative to the ratiometric technique is the lifetime-based approach.17,2024 In the case of luminescence kinetics, the absorption of the emitted radiation by the medium does not significantly affect the lifetimes of excited states and thus does not modify the calibration curve of the thermometer. To increase the sensitivity of a thermometer based on luminescence kinetics, physical processes are sought that will significantly affect the thermal dynamics of the emission level depopulation in a predictable way. In the case of lanthanide ions, the main process responsible for the thermal depopulation of the excited level is the multiphonon depopulation process. However, the probability of this process increases when the number of phonons required to energetically bridge the emitting level with the next lower-lying level decreases. Unfortunately, this leads to the reduction of the luminescence intensity. Therefore, recently there has been increasing interest in the exploitation of alternative processes, among which phonon-assisted energy transfer provides very promising results.2527 In this case, a luminescent ion characterized by high luminescence intensity provided by a high energy separation between the excited and the ground levels and a codoped ion with a configuration of energy levels that serve as an energy acceptor are desirable.28 An ideal pair of ions fulfilling these requirements is Yb3+, Nd3+ ions, where the distance between the ground 2F7/2 and excited 2F5/2 levels of about 10,000 cm–1 limits the probability of multiphonon processes and the 4F3/2 level of Nd3+ ions located about 1500 cm–1 above 2F5/2 can be populated after the absorption of one to two host phonons.29,30 The probability of this process strongly depends on the temperature. A luminescent thermometer could be developed on the basis of this finding.2527 An additional advantage of using this ion pair is the fact that they operate in the near-infrared spectral range, which can be important for many applications, e.g., biomedicine.3133 To develop thermometers with the desired properties and thermometric parameters, it is important to understand what material parameters and how they affect the thermometric performance of the phosphor. As our previous studies have shown, the chemical composition of the host material significantly affects the thermometric parameters in APO4:Nd3+,Yb3+ (A = Y, Lu, La, Gd).25

In this work, the effect of the synthesis parameters on the morphology of YPO4:Nd3+,Yb3+ nanocrystals and their consequences on the thermometric parameters of the phosphor are analyzed. For this purpose, the solvothermal synthesis method in a mixture of ethanol and oleic acid was used.34,35 It was observed that with the increase in the molar concentration of (PO4)3– ions relative to RE3+ cations, the cubic nanoparticles (for (PO4)3–:RE3+ = 0.5) change their shape to spherical ((PO4)3–:RE3+ = 1). Further decrease in the (PO4)3– concentration causes the lowering of the particle size and facilitates their aggregation. On the other hand, with the increasing concentration of Nd3+ ions, the morphology of nanocrystals also undergoes a significant modification from spherical nanoparticles, with the shape of nanoparticles changing to cubic and then elongating along one axis to form elongated cuboids (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the influence of the synthesis condition on the morphology of the YPO4:Nd3+,Yb3+ nanocrystals.

2. Experimental Section

Ytterbium(III) oxide Yb2O3 (99.99%, Alfa Aesar), europium(III) oxide Eu2O3 (99.99%, Alfa Aesar), neodymium(III) oxide Nd2O3 (99.9%, Alfa Aesar), yttrium(III) oxide Y2O3 (99.99%, Alfa Aesar), sodium phosphate Na3PO4 (98.0%, Alfa Aesar), oleic acid (90%, Sigma Aldrich), sodium hydroxide (99.8%, POCH S.A., Poland), ethanol (96% pure p.a. POCH S.A. Poland), methanol (POCH S.A., Poland), n-hexane (POCH S.A., Poland), and chloroform (POCH, Poland) were used without further purification.

In a typical synthesis in a 50 mL autoclave, 0.6 g of NaOH was dissolved into 5 mL of deionized water under stirring. The rare-earth (RE) oxides were dissolved in hydrochloric acid to obtain chloride salts. The resulting rare-earth salts were adjusted to neutral pH by recrystallizing three times with distilled water. Then, the rare-earth chlorides (0.2 M) were added. Thereafter, 10 mL of ethanol and 10 mL of oleic acid were added under vigorous stirring. After 1 h, 5 mL of NaH2PO4 aqueous solution (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1 M) and 10 mL of ethanol were added to the autoclave after stirring for another 30 min. Then, the autoclave was sealed and heated at 180 °C for 8 h. The solution was cooled to room temperature and the nanoparticles were washed with hexane/ethanol by centrifugation. The final product was redispersed in 5 mL of chloroform.

2.1. Methods

Powder diffraction data were obtained using a PANalytical X’Pert Pro diffractometer equipped with an Anton Paar TCU 1000 N temperature control unit using Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation (V = 40 kV, I = 30 mA). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were performed with a Philips CM-20 SuperTwin transmission electron microscope operating at 160 kV. A drop of the suspension was put on a copper microscope grid covered with carbon. Before the measurement, the sample was dried and purified in an H2/O2 plasma cleaner for 1 min. The hydrodynamic size of nanoparticles was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using Malvern ZetaSizer at room temperature in a quartz cuvette using hexane as a dispersant. Measurements were made using histograms representing the number of particles per their average size. The emission spectra and luminescence decay profiles were measured using an FLS1000 fluorescence spectrometer from Edinburgh Instruments equipped with a 450 W Xenon lamp and 808 nm line laser as excitation sources and an R928P side window photomultiplier tube from Hamamatsu as a detector. The temperature of the sample was controlled using a THMS 600 heating–cooling stage from Linkam.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural and Morphological Characterization

Depending on the synthesis condition, the YPO4 crystallizes in the tetragonal or hexagonal structures.3638 However, a tetragonal structure is usually observed when higher annealing temperatures are applied, whereas in the case of the as-prepared nanocrystals, a typical hexagonal structure of the P6222 space group can be found (Figure 2a). In this host material, the Y3+ ions are coordinated by eight O2– ions, and this dodecahedral site can be successfully substituted by lanthanide dopant ions (Figure 2b).3638 Despite many factors such as pH, reaction time, and solvent volume ratio, the (PO4)3–:RE3+ ratio can most significantly influence the nanocrystal growth process. Therefore, the first aspect in the optimization of the synthesis conditions of YPO4:Nd3+,Yb3+ nanocrystals is to find a proper ratio between phosphate ions (PO4)3– and rare-earth ions (RE). It is found that even for the nonstoichiometric ratio between ions, pure phased nanocrystals can be obtained (Figure 2c). However, the comparison of the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the nanocrystals synthesized using different ionic ratios does not reveal any phase impurities. One can observe that for samples with different Nd3+ concentrations exhibit a slight shift in the reflections toward lower 2θ angles (e.g., from 20.48 to 20.17° for the most intense reflection). This is due to the expansion of the crystallographic cell unit associated with the ionic difference between Nd3+ and Y3+ ions, which may also be associated with the preferred orientation of the particles or the preferred growth direction of the nanoparticles. The average particle size determined using the DLS technique indicates that when the (PO4)3–:RE3+ ratio is below 1, the nanoparticles of average size around 26 nm are obtained (Figure 2d). When the stoichiometric amount of (PO4)3– ions is applied, an increase in the particle size to 107 nm is found. A further decrease in the molar amount of the phosphate ions results in an increase in size to 250 nm and 270 nm for the ratios 2 and 5, respectively. However, as is well known, the results obtained from the DLS technique for nonspherical and highly aggregated particles can be misleading. This is particularly important when a PDI close to 1 is obtained. However, in the case of the examined materials with nonaggregated particle form, the PDI values range from 0.002 to 0.310; therefore, the quality of the measurements is satisfactory. The analysis of the TEM images (Figure S1) reveals that for a low (PO4)3–:RE3+ ratio of 0.5, the cubic nanoparticles can be obtained. An increase in the stoichiometric ratio causes the crystallization of relatively large spherical particles. Further increase in the (PO4)3–:RE3+ ratio reduces the size of the particles and facilitates their aggregation. Since the small particle size and nonaggregation are optimized for (PO4)3–:RE3+ = 0.5, this molar ratio is applied in further syntheses. In the second step of the analysis, the influence of the Nd3+ concentration on the structural and morphological properties of the YPO4:Nd3+,Yb3+ nanocrystals is investigated. It is found that even for 75% Nd3+, the hexagonal structure remains (Figure 2e). However, the morphology differs significantly when the Nd3+ concentration is increased. In the case of as low as 1% Nd3+, the spherical particles are achieved with a diameter of around 14 nm, and an increase in Nd3+ to 25% results in the enlargement of their size to around 60 nm. Surprisingly, a further increase in the Nd3+ concentration enables us to achieve a cube with a size of 40 nm (50% Nd3+) and even rodlike particles with a length of 120 nm and a width of 15 nm (75% Nd3+). As can be clearly seen, the results obtained using the DLS technique are not reliable in this case (Figure 2f).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Visualization of the hexagonal structure of YPO4 (a) and the polyhedra of Y3+ ions (b). (c) XRD patterns of YPO4:10% Yb3+, 50% Nd3+ synthesized with different RE3+:(PO4)3– ratios and (d) the corresponding particle size distribution obtained from DLS measurements. (e) XRD patterns for YPO4:10% Yb3+ and different concentrations of Nd3+ ions and (f) the corresponding particle size distribution obtained from DLS measurements.

The luminescent properties of the Nd3+ and Yb3+ ions are very well known.3941 Therefore, only a brief description is given here. Upon 808 nm excitation, the excited state 4F5/2 of the Nd3+ ions can be populated, followed by the fast nonradiative processes causing the population of the emitting 4F3/2 state of the Nd3+. Radiative depopulation of the 4F3/2 state leads to the occurrence of the three emission bands at around 880, 1060, and 1350 nm that can be assigned to the 4F3/24I9/2, 4F3/24I11/2, and 4F3/24I13/2 transitions, respectively. In the presence of the Yb3+ codopant, the 4F3/2 state of the Nd3+ ions can be also depopulated by the energy transfer with the emission of the phonon to the 2F5/2 state of the Yb3+ ions. The high energy separation between the 2F5/2 state and the 2F7/2 ground state (around 10,000 cm–1) prevents efficient depopulation of the excited state of Yb3+ by multiphonon relaxation. However, an increase in temperature results in the growing probability of the back energy transfer to the Nd3+ with the absorption of phonons, thus shortening its lifetime. This preserves high thermal variability of the lifetime of the Yb3+ ions and thus is beneficial from the thermometric perspective. However, in the case of the nanocrystals also, the surface effect significantly affects the luminescent properties of the dopant ions.4245 In the case of the small particles, the energy diffusion among excited states of Yb3+ ions to the surface defects becomes a very efficient channel for the quenching of the luminescence. Thus, the smaller the particle, the shorter the lifetime that is expected in this case. As can be seen, the applied different RE3+:(PO4)3– ratios affect the morphology of the YPO4:10% Yb3+, 50% Nd3+ significantly (Figure 3a–d). Hence, changes in the spectroscopic properties of these particles are expected. The comparison of the low-temperature emission spectra of the YPO4:10% Yb3+, 50% Nd3+ reveals that some changes can be found in the shape of the 4F3/24I9/2 emission band when the RE3+:(PO4)3– is changed (Figure 3e). The smaller the particle size, the higher intensity of R1 → Z1 and R2 → Z1 electronic transitions between particular Stark components of excited and ground states. This effect can be explained in terms of the energy reabsorption between Nd3+ ions.46 When the concentration of Nd3+ is high, the light emitted by one of the ions can be absorbed by the other before being emitted from the nanoparticle. The probability of energy reabsorption is the highest for the resonant lines since the population of the Z1 Stark sublevel of the 4I9/2 state is the highest. The larger the size of the particle, the higher the probability of this process because the longer distance photon needs to travel before it leaves the nanoparticle. Therefore, for smaller nanoparticles, more intense R1 → Z1 and R2 → Z1 emission lines can be found by comparing larger counterparts.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Representative TEM images of the YPO4:10% Yb3+, 50% Nd3+ nanoparticles synthesized using different (PO4)3–:RE3+ ratios of 0.5 (a), 1 (b), 2.5 (c), and 5 (d). (e) Comparison of the normalized emission spectra of YPO4:10% Yb3+, 50% Nd3+ nanoparticles measured at 77 K upon λexc = 808 nm, (f) emission intensity ratio of Nd3+ to Yb3+ ions, (g) luminescence decay profile of Yb3+ ions, and (h) the corresponding τavr of the 2F5/2 state of Yb3+ ions as a function of (PO4)3–:RE3+ ratio.

Also, the emission intensity ratio of Nd3+ to Yb3+ ions is modified by the size of the particles (Figure 3f). The reduction of the particle size leads to a monotonic increase in the Nd3+-to-Yb3+ ratio. This effect can be caused by either the reduction of the Yb3+ emission intensity or a growing emission intensity of Nd3+. Since the spectral position of the emission bands is independent of the RE3+:(PO4)3– ratio, the energy-level configuration of Yb3+ and Nd3+ remains unchanged. Hence, the probability of the interionic energy transfer is expected to be independent of the particle size in this case. Therefore, the observed phenomenon can be explained in terms of two effects. First of them is the light-induced heating of the particles and associated with this more promoted transfer of the electrons from Yb3+ to Nd3+. The efficiency of heat dissipation in strongly dimensionally constrained objects like nanoparticles is strongly limited. Hence, light-induced heating is more efficient for smaller objects. On the other hand, the reduction of the particle size causes an enhancement of the probability of the quenching of the excited state of Yb3+ ions via surface-related quenching processes. Undoubtedly, the change in Yb3+ emission intensity affects the ratio of luminescence intensity of Nd3+ to Yb3+ ions, which is confirmed by the analysis of luminescence kinetics of Yb3+ ions (Figure 3g). It is clearly seen that with the increasing RE3+:(PO4)3– concentration, the average lifetime (τavr, eqs S1 and S2) of the 2F7/2 level is monotonically shortened from τavr = 250 μs for RE = 0.5 to τavr = 48 μs for RE = 5.

To verify the influence of the particle size on the luminescence thermometer parameters based on the lifetime of the 2F7/2 level of Yb3+ ions, the luminescence kinetics was measured as a function of temperature and the average lifetimes were determined (Figures S2 and 4a). As shown in the presented analysis for RE3+:(PO4)3– = 0.5, τavr shortens significantly above 200 K up to about 350 K, above which the rate of observed changes slows down. An increase in the RE3+:(PO4)3– ratio, as shown earlier, reduces the value of τavr and an increase in temperature causes an additional shortening of its value but at a much lower rate than is the case for larger nanoparticles. This effect can be explained by the increased role of surface processes. As it is well known, in the case of materials doped with Yb3+ ions, the energy diffusion across excited 2F5/2 states is very efficient.32,47,48 For nanomaterials, such a process due to the relatively short ion–surface distance very often leads to energy quenching at the nanocrystal surface through interactions with ligands and functional groups on the surface or on surface structural defects.4245 The energy diffusion is a resonant process and its probability should not depend on the temperature, so it effectively shortens the lifetime of Yb3+ ions when it becomes more efficient by reducing the nanoparticle. From a thermometric perspective, this process can be seen as competing with the energy transfer process between Yb3+ and Nd3+; whereas the latter favors increasing the sensitivity of the thermometer, the former suppresses the thermal dynamics of the lifetime changes. For small nanoparticles, it is so efficient that further temperature-induced shortening of τavr values is less evident. The rate of temperature-induced shortening of the Yb3+ ion lifetime can be quantified by the absolute sensitivity (SA) of the luminescence thermometer determined by the following formula14

3.1. 1

where Δτavr represents the change in τavr corresponding to the change in temperature by ΔT. As expected, the highest SA values were obtained for the largest nanoparticles because the longest τavr values were found for these nanoparticles. The maximum value of SA = 1.36 μs/K was obtained at 275 K. Decreasing the size of nanoparticles resulted in a successive decrease in the SA value. For the smallest nanoparticles (RE3+:(PO4)3– ratio = 5), the maximum SA = 0.06 μs/K at 220 K. For a further quantitative comparative analysis, the relative sensitivity was also determined according to the equation14

3.1. 2

In this case, the highest value of SR = 0.9%/K was obtained at 300 K for YPO4:10% Yb3+,50% Nd3+ synthesized using RE3+:(PO4)3– = 0.5 (Figure 5c). It was worth noting that the temperature at which the maximum sensitivity was obtained for individual samples depended on the size of the nanoparticles and a general trend could be observed that it decreased with the reduction of the size of the luminescent thermometer. The maximum values of SR decreased monotonically with the RE3+:(PO4)3– (Figure 5d). The analysis carried out allowed us to conclude that to increase the sensitivity of the luminescence thermometer based on luminescence lifetimes, it was advantageous to use nanoparticles of a larger size. It should be noted here that the hexagonal structure of the YPO4 was stabilized by the crystallographic OH groups that could affect the population of the excited state of the 2F5/2 state of Yb3+ ions. Hence, the removal of the OH groups at higher temperatures may influence the τavr. However, according to the TG-DSC analysis shown by Li et al. in the hexagonal YPO4, this removal was observed around 470 K.49 This temperature exceeded the analyzed temperature range in this study.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Thermal dependence of the τavr of Yb3+ ions obtained for different RE3+:(PO4)3– ratios. The corresponding SA (b) and SR (c). (d) Influence of the RE3+:(PO4)3– on the maximal SR (d).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Representative TEM images for YPO4:10% Yb3+, % Nd3+ nanoparticles with different Nd3+ concentrations: 1% Nd3+ (a), 25% Nd3+ (b), 50% Nd3+ (c), and 75% Nd3+ (d). (e) Comparison of the low-temperature emission spectra upon λexc = 808 nm for different Nd3+ concentrations. (f) Nd3+ to Yb3+ emission intensity ratio as a function of Nd3+ concentration. (g) Influence of the Nd3+ on the τavr of 2F5/2 state of Yb3+ ions.

As indicated by the above studies, the nanocrystal morphology had a significant effect on the thermometric performance of a luminescent thermometer based on the luminescence decay times from the 2F5/2 level. Taking into account that the phonon-assisted energy transfer to the neighboring Nd3+ ion was responsible for the thermal lifetime shortening of this level, one could expect that increasing the Nd3+ ion concentration would facilitate this energy transfer by shortening the average Nd3+–Yb3+ distance. Therefore, the thermometric properties of such a thermometer were expected to depend significantly on the concentration of Nd3+ ions. On the other hand, it was known that REPO4 phosphates with large RE ionic radii (such as Nd3+) preferentially crystallized in the monoclinic structure and revealed an increased tendency to form elongated rodlike structures.50 Therefore, it was important to verify how the concentration of Nd3+ ions affected the morphology and spectroscopic properties of the obtained phosphors. As mentioned above and illustrated by representative TEM images, the increase in the concentration of Nd3+ ions significantly modified the morphology of the sample. For a concentration of 1% Nd3+, small, spherical, and nonaggregated nanoparticles were observed (Figure 5a). An increase in the Nd3+ concentration to 25% enlarged the size of the nanoparticles while maintaining their shape (Figure 5b). However, the increase in the Nd3+ ion concentration to 50% caused a slight decrease in the size of the nanoparticles. Additionally, apart from spherical particles, cubic ones could also be observed (Figure 5c). Further increase in the concentration of Nd3+ ions resulted in the elongation of the nanoparticles’ shape by their growth along the c-axis (Figure 5d).50 Importantly, even for such high concentrations of Nd3+ ions, the hexagonal structure was maintained (Figure 2). A comparison of the luminescence spectra of YPO4:10% Yb3+,% Nd3+ with different concentrations of Nd3+ ions revealed that this change in concentration caused the reduction of the luminescence intensity of the 4F3/24I9/2 band of Nd3+ ions relative to the 2F5/22F7/2 band of Yb3+ ions. This was mainly due to an increase in the quenching of the excited level of 4F3/2 through the {4F3/2, 4I9/2} ↔ {4I15/2, 4I15/2} cross-relaxation process. Additionally, the shape of the emission bands changed slightly, revealing a larger number of Stark components for both Nd3+ and Yb3+ bands. This effect suggested a decrease in the local symmetry of the lanthanide ions as the concentration of Nd3+ ions increased associated with the transition to the monoclinic NdPO4 structure. Considering the fact that XRD patterns confirmed the presence of only hexagonal structure, the change in the shape of the emission spectrum might indicate the local character of the mentioned changes. Assuming that the observed symmetry changes occurred only in the inner part of the nanocrystal and the hexagonal phase was stabilized mainly in the surface part of the nanocrystal, one could expect that the luminescence spectra would be dominated by the contribution from ions localized in the reduced symmetry. However, this was a speculative hypothesis and required more in-depth investigation in the future. The ratio of the luminescence intensity of Nd3+ ions to Yb3+ ions decreased almost linearly with increasing Nd3+ ion concentration (Figure 5f). As expected, the lifetime of the 2F5/2 level shortened with the increasing Nd3+ concentration, and the monotonic nature of this shortening with no deviation around between 25% Nd3+ and 75% Nd3+ where significant changes in nanoparticle shape were observed indicated that the dominant factor causing the shortening was the effect of shortening the average distance between interacting ions.

As can be seen, regardless of the Nd3+ ion concentration, τavr shortens above 190 K. However, the rate of this shortening clearly depends on the dopant concentration (Figures 6a and S3). As indicated above, the high efficiency of the phonon energy transfer process associated with an increase in dopant ion concentration results in a shortening of τavr. Therefore, the additional lifetime shortening associated with phonon absorption is less efficient (Figure 6a). Hence, the highest absolute sensitivities and the relative sensitivities are observed for low dopant concentrations. Importantly, a linear decrease in the maximum relative sensitivity is observed with increasing concentration. This directly demonstrates that although increasing the Nd3+ concentration causes a change in sample morphology (which should result in improved thermometric performance as the nanoparticle size increases), the increased probability of phonon-assisted energy transfer plays a dominant role in this case. The high repeatability of the τavr within several heating–cooling cycles (Figure S5) and low-temperature determination uncertainty (δT < 0.1 K) confirms the high applicative potential of the presented luminescence thermometers.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Thermal dependence of the τavr of 2F5/2 state of Yb3+ ions in YPO4:10% Yb3+, Nd3+ for different concentrations of Nd3+ ions (a); SA (b) and SR (c); and influence of the Nd3+ concentration on the maximal achieved SR (d).

4. Conclusions

The solvothermal synthesis parameters of YPO4:Nd3+,Yb3+ nanocrystals significantly affect the morphology of the final product. It has been shown that using low RE3+:(PO4)3– concentrations can deliver cubic and well-separated nanocrystals while increasing the RE3+:(PO4 )3– ratio results in a decrease in the size of nanoparticles, changing their shape to spherical and increasing the degree of aggregation. This significantly affects not only the spectroscopic properties of YPO4:Yb3+,Nd3+ but also the thermometric performance of the thermometer based on the luminescence kinetics of the 2F5/2 level of Yb3+ ions. The decrease in nanoparticle size increases the role of surface quenching processes in the luminescence of Yb3+ ions manifested in the shortening of the lifetime of the 2F5/2 level and decrease in the emission intensity of the 2F5/22F7/2 band with respect to the 4F3/24I9/2 band of Nd3+ ions. The surface luminescence quenching processes competing with the energy transfer process involving Yb3+ → Nd3+ phonons decrease the absolute and relative sensitivity of the luminescence thermometer. An increase in the concentration of Nd3+ ions changes the shape of nanoparticles from spherical to cubic (50% Nd3+) or even rodlike (75% Nd3+). Cross-relaxation-activated processes decrease the luminescence intensity of the Nd3+ band relative to the Yb3+ band with the increasing Nd3+ concentration. Interestingly, the shape of the luminescence spectra recorded for Nd3+ concentrations above 50% suggests that a monoclinic structural phase is present in the samples despite the fact that the XRD falls indicate the presence of only hexagonal structure. Considering the linear decrease in the maximum relative sensitivity of the luminescent thermometer with increasing Nd3+ ion concentration, it can be concluded that the concentration of Nd3+ ions has a dominant influence on the thermometric parameters of this type of thermometer. The presented studies indicate the important role of nanocrystal morphology on thermometric performance, which is often not considered, or not analyzed.

Acknowledgments

K.M. acknowledges the START Fellowship from the Foundation for Polish Science.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c03990.

  • Additional TEM images and luminescence decay profiles measured at different temperatures (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao2c03990_si_001.pdf (486.6KB, pdf)

References

  1. Klick C. C.; Schulman J. H.. Luminescence in Solids. In Solid State Physics—Advances in Research and Applications; Seitz F.; Turnbull D. B., Eds.; Academic Press, 1957; Vol. 5, pp 97–172. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fuxi G.; Huimin L. Spectroscopy of Transition Metal Ions in Inorganic Glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1986, 80, 20–33. 10.1016/0022-3093(86)90376-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Solé J. G.; Bausá L. E.; Jaque D.. Applications: Rare Earth and Transition Metal Ions, and Color Centers. In An Introduction to the Optical Spectroscopy of Inorganic Solids; John Wiley & Sons, 2005; pp 199–234. [Google Scholar]
  4. Light Sources . Annual Reports on Analytical Atomic Spectroscopy; Royal Society of Chemistry, 1972; pp 2–6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Runowski M.; Shyichuk A.; Tymiński A.; Grzyb T.; Lavín V.; Lis S. Multifunctional Optical Sensors for Nanomanometry and Nanothermometry: High-Pressure and High-Temperature Upconversion Luminescence of Lanthanide-Doped Phosphates - LaPO4/YPO4:Yb3+-Tm3+. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 17269–17279. 10.1021/acsami.8b02853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vetrone F.; Naccache R.; Zamarrón A.; De La Fuente A. J.; Sanz-Rodríguez F.; Maestro L. M.; Rodriguez E. M.; Jaque D.; Sole J. G.; Capobianco J. A. Temperature Sensing Using Fluorescent Nanothermometers. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3254–3258. 10.1021/nn100244a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang X.; Liu Q.; Bu Y.; Liu C. S.; Liu T.; Yan X. Optical Temperature Sensing of Rare-Earth Ion Doped Phosphors. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 86219–86236. 10.1039/c5ra16986k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Khalid A. H.; Kontis K. Thermographic Phosphors for High Temperature Measurements: Principles, Current State of the Art and Recent Applications. Sensors 2008, 8, 5673–5744. 10.3390/s8095673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu Y.; Tu D.; Zhu H.; Chen X. Lanthanide-Doped Luminescent Nanoprobes: Controlled Synthesis, Optical Spectroscopy, and Bioapplications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6924–6958. 10.1039/c3cs60060b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kniec K.; Marciniak L. A Ratiometric Luminescence PH Sensor Based on YAG:V3+,V5+ Nanoparticles. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 11562 10.1039/d2nj01595a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jaque D.; Vetrone F. Luminescence Nanothermometry. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 4301–4326. 10.1039/c2nr30764b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fischer L. H.; Harms G. S.; Wolfbeis O. S. Upconverting Nanoparticles for Nanoscale Thermometry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4546–4551. 10.1002/anie.201006835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brites C. D. S.; Balabhadra S.; Carlos L. D. Lanthanide-Based Thermometers: At the Cutting-Edge of Luminescence Thermometry. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1801239 10.1002/adom.201801239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brites C. D. S.; Millán A.; Carlos L. D.. Lanthanides in Luminescent Thermometry. In Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths, Jean-Claude B.; Vitalij K., Eds.; Elsevier, 2016; Vol. 49, pp 339–427. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shang L.; Stockmar F.; Azadfar N.; Nienhaus G. U. Intracellular Thermometry by Using Fluorescent Gold Nanoclusters. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 11154–11157. 10.1002/anie.201306366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dramićanin M. D. Trends in Luminescence Thermometry. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128, 40902 10.1063/5.0014825. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bednarkiewicz A.; Marciniak L.; Carlos L. D.; Jaque D. Standardizing Luminescence Nanothermometry for Biomedical Applications. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 14405–14421. 10.1039/d0nr03568h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bednarkiewicz A.; Drabik J.; Trejgis K.; Jaque D.; Ximendes E.; Marciniak L. Luminescence Based Temperature Bio-Imaging: Status, Challenges, and Perspectives. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2021, 8, 11317 10.1063/5.0030295. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dramićanin M. D. Sensing Temperature via Downshifting Emissions of Lanthanide-Doped Metal Oxides and Salts. A Review. Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 2016, 4, 42001 10.1088/2050-6120/4/4/042001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Labrador-Páez L.; Pedroni M.; Speghini A.; García-Solé J.; Haro-González P.; Jaque D. Reliability of Rare-Earth-Doped Infrared Luminescent Nanothermometers. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 22319–22328. 10.1039/c8nr07566b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zheng T.; Luo L.; Du P.; Lis S.; Rodríguez-Mendoza U. R.; Lavín V.; Runowski M. Highly-Efficient Double Perovskite Mn4+-Activated Gd2ZnTiO6 Phosphors: A Bifunctional Optical Sensing Platform for Luminescence Thermometry and Manometry. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 136839 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136839. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Xue J.; Li F.; Liu F.; Noh H. M.; Lee B. R.; Choi B. C.; Park S. H.; Jeong J. H.; Du P. Designing Ultra-Highly Efficient Mn2+-Activated Zn2GeO4 Green-Emitting Persistent Phosphors toward Versatile Applications. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 23, 100693 10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100693. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Runowski M.; Goderski S.; Przybylska D.; Grzyb T.; Lis S.; Martín I. R. Sr2LuF7:Yb3+–Ho3+–Er3+ Upconverting Nanoparticles as Luminescent Thermometers in the First, Second, and Third Biological Windows. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 6406–6415. 10.1021/acsanm.0c00839. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Santos H. D. A.; Ruiz D.; Lifante G.; Jacinto C.; Juarez B. H.; Jaque D. Time Resolved Spectroscopy of Infrared Emitting Ag2S Nanocrystals for Subcutaneous Thermometry. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 2505–2513. 10.1039/C6NR08534B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Maciejewska K.; Bednarkiewicz A.; Marciniak L. NIR Luminescence Lifetime Nanothermometry Based on Phonon Assisted Yb3+-Nd3+ energy Transfer. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3, 4918–4925. 10.1039/d1na00285f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Maciejewska K.; Szalkowski M.; Bednarkiewicz A.; Marciniak L. From Structural Phase Transition to Highly Sensitive Lifetime Based Luminescent Thermometer: Multifaceted Modification of Thermometric Performance in Y0.9-XNdxYb0.1PO4 nanocrystals. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 15831–15839. 10.1039/d1tc04107j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tan M.; Li F.; Cao N.; Li H.; Wang X.; Zhang C.; Jaque D.; Chen G. Accurate In Vivo Nanothermometry through NIR-II Lanthanide Luminescence Lifetime. Small 2020, 16, 2004118 10.1002/smll.202004118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Miyakawa T.; Dexter D. L. Phonon Sidebands, Multiphonon Relaxation of Excited States, and Phonon-Assisted Energy Transfer between Ions in Solids. Phys. Rev. B 1970, 1, 2961–2969. 10.1103/PhysRevB.1.2961. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lupei A.; Lupei V.; Ikesue A.; Gheorghe C.; Hau S. Nd → Yb Energy Transfer in (Nd, Yb):Y2O3 Transparent Ceramics. Opt. Mater. 2010, 32, 1333–1336. 10.1016/j.optmat.2010.04.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Artizzu F.; Serpe A.; Marchiò L.; Saba M.; Mura A.; Mercuri M. L.; Bongiovanni G.; Deplano P.; Quochi F. Controlling Nd-to-Yb Energy Transfer through a Molecular Approach. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 11524–11530. 10.1039/c5tc02985f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ximendes E. C.; Santos W. Q.; Rocha U.; Kagola U. K.; Sanz-Rodríguez F.; Fernández N.; Gouveia-Neto A. D. S.; Bravo D.; Domingo A. M.; Del Rosal B.; Brites C. D. S.; Carlos L. D.; Jaque D.; Jacinto C. Unveiling in Vivo Subcutaneous Thermal Dynamics by Infrared Luminescent Nanothermometers. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 1695–1703. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Marciniak Ł.; Bednarkiewicz A.; Stefanski M.; Tomala R.; Hreniak D.; Strek W. Near Infrared Absorbing near Infrared Emitting Highly-Sensitive Luminescent Nanothermometer Based on Nd3+ to Yb3+ Energy Transfer. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 24315–24321. 10.1039/c5cp03861h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Damasco J. A.; Ohulchanskyy T. Y.; Mahajan S.; Chen G.; Singh A.; Kutscher H. L.; Huang H.; Turowski S. G.; Spernyak J. A.; Singh A. K.; Lovell J. F.; Seshadri M.; Prasad P. N. Excretable, Ultrasmall Hexagonal NaGdF4:Yb50% Nanoparticles for Bimodal Imaging and Radiosensitization. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2021, 12, 4 10.1186/s12645-021-00075-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Toro-González M.; Clifford D. M.; Copping R.; Mirzadeh S.; Rojas J. V. Synthesis and Characterization of Intrinsically Radiolabeled Lanthanide Phosphate Nanoparticles toward Biomedical and Environmental Applications. J. Nanopart. Res. 2018, 20, 238 10.1007/s11051-018-4338-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Riwotzki K.; Meyssamy H.; Kornowski A.; Haase M. Liquid-Phase Synthesis of Doped Nanoparticles: Colloids of Luminescing LaPO4:Eu and CePO4:Tb Particles with a Narrow Particle Size Distribution. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 2824–2828. 10.1021/jp993581r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Milligan W. O.; Mullica D. F.; Beall G. W.; Boatner L. A. Structural Investigations of YPO4, ScPO4, and LuPO4. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1982, 60, 39–43. 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)91148-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Parchur A. K.; Ningthoujam R. S. Preparation, Microstructure and Crystal Structure Studies of Li+ Co-Doped YPO4:Eu3+. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 10854–10858. 10.1039/c2ra20763j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rafiuddin M. R.; Mueller E.; Grosvenor A. P. X-Ray Spectroscopic Study of the Electronic Structure of Monazite- and Xenotime-Type Rare-Earth Phosphates. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 18000–18009. 10.1021/jp5051996. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jaque D.; Ramirez O.; Bausá E.; Solé G.; Cavalli E.; Speghini A.; Bettinelli M. Nd3+→Yb3+ Energy Transfer in the YAl3(BO3)4 Nonlinear Laser Crystal. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 68, 35118 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.035118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Suo H.; Zhao X.; Zhang Z.; Guo C. Ultra-Sensitive Optical Nano-Thermometer LaPO4: Yb3+/Nd3+ Based on Thermo-Enhanced NIR-to-NIR Emissions. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 389, 124506 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Meijer J. M.; Aarts L.; Van Der Ende B. M.; Vlugt T. J. H.; Meijerink A. Downconversion for Solar Cells in YF3: Nd3+, Yb3+. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 35107 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.035107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Arppe R.; Hyppänen I.; Perälä N.; Peltomaa R.; Kaiser M.; Würth C.; Christ S.; Resch-Genger U.; Schäferling M.; Soukka T. Quenching of the Upconversion Luminescence of NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+ and NaYF4:Yb3+,Tm3+ Nanophosphors by Water: The Role of the Sensitizer Yb3+ in Non-Radiative Relaxation. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 11746–11757. 10.1039/c5nr02100f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen X.; Jin L.; Kong W.; Sun T.; Zhang W.; Liu X.; Fan J.; Yu S. F.; Wang F. Confining Energy Migration in Upconversion Nanoparticles towards Deep Ultraviolet Lasing. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10304 10.1038/ncomms10304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhao J.; Lu Z.; Yin Y.; McRae C.; Piper J. A.; Dawes J. M.; Jin D.; Goldys E. M. Upconversion Luminescence with Tunable Lifetime in NaYF4:Yb,Er Nanocrystals: Role of Nanocrystal Size. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 944–952. 10.1039/c2nr32482b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang Y.; Tu L.; Zhao J.; Sun Y.; Kong X.; Zhang H. Upconversion Luminescence of β-NaYF4: Yb3+, Er3+ β-NaYF4 Core/Shell Nanoparticles: Excitation Power Density and Surface Dependence. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 7164–7169. 10.1021/jp9003399. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Marciniak L.; Strek W.; Guyot Y.; Hreniak D.; Boulon G. Synthesis and Nd3+ Luminescence Properties of ALa1-XNdxP4O12 (A = Li, Na, K, Rb) Tetraphosphate Nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 5160–5167. 10.1021/jp512737f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Auzel F.; Baldacchini G.; Laversenne L.; Boulon G. Radiation Trapping and Self-Quenching Analysis in Yb3+, Er3+, and Ho3+ Doped Y2O3. Opt. Mater. 2003, 24, 103–109. 10.1016/S0925-3467(03)00112-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Chen P. L.; Chen I. W. Grain Boundary Mobility in Y2O3: Defect Mechanism and Dopant Effects. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1996, 79, 1801–1809. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb07998.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Li P.; Liu Y.; Guo Y.; Shi X.; Zhu G.; Zuo H. Hydrothermal Synthesis of YPO4:Eu3+ Hexagonal Prisms Microarchitectures: Tunable Morphology, Formation Mechanism, and Recovery Luminescence Properties. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 6620–6630. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Cho J.; Kim C. H. Solid-State Phase Transformation Mechanism from Hexagonal GdPO4: Eu3+ Nanorods to Monoclinic Nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 31385–31392. 10.1039/c4ra03229b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao2c03990_si_001.pdf (486.6KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES