Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 25;9:913046. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.913046

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of anti-CCHFV Gc-specific and anti-CCHFV NP-specific IgG in-house ELISAs vs. VectoCrimean-CCHF IgG and ID Screen® CCHF Double Antigen Multi-species commercial kits. A subset of sheep sera collected as part of a cross-sectional study in an endemic CCHFV area (n =8 0) was tested for anti-CCHFV Gc-specific IgG and anti-CCHFV NP-specific IgG by in-house ELISAs and with VectoCrimean-CHF IgG and ID Screen® CCHF Double Antigen Multi-species commercial kits. Left panel shows spearman correlations between responses evaluated by: (A) anti-CCHFV Gc-specific IgG in-house ELISA and VectoCrimean-CHF IgG, (B) anti-CCHFV NP-specific IgG in-house ELISA and VectoCrimean-CHF IgG, or (C) ID Screen® CCHF Double Antigen Multi-species. Right panel shows ROC curves generated using: (A) anti-CCHFV Gc-specific in-house ELISA OD measured at 450 nm and positive (n = 41) and negative (n = 39) sera results obtained with VectoCrimean-CHF IgG; (B) anti-CCHFV NP-specific in-house ELISA OD measured at 450 nm and positive (n = 41) and negative (n = 39) sera results obtained with VectoCrimean-CHF IgG, or (C) positive (n = 35) and negative (n = 45) sera results obtained with ID Screen® CCHF Double Antigen Multi-species.