Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 8;23:236. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02162-y

Table 2.

Impact of ever WS exposure on baseline lung function and its declinea

Group Years Ever WS exposure Ever WS exposurea years
All subjects
 FEV1 (ml/s) − 24.2 (1.0) − 75.2 (23.7) − 4.3 (1.9)
 P value  < 0.0001 0.0016 0.025
 FVC (ml) − 15.0 (1.2) − 26.1 (25.2) − 2.4 (2.4)
 P value  < 0.0001 0.30 0.30
 FEV1/FVC ratio (%) − 0.386 (0.019) − 1.792 (0.430) − 0.093 (0.038)
 P value  < 0.0001  < 0.0001 0.015
Age < 55.9 yearb
 FEV1 (ml/s) − 24.4 (1.5) − 65.6 (30.7) − 0.5 (2.8)
 P value  < 0.0001 0.033 0.85
 FVC (ml) − 13.5 (1.7) − 7.3 (33.1) − 1.6 (3.2)
 P value  < 0.0001 0.82 0.62
 FEV1/FVC ratio (%) − 0.379 (0.029) − 1.666 (0.493) − 0.014 (0.053)
 P value  < 0.0001 0.0008 0.80
Age ≥ 55.9 yearb
 FEV1 (ml/s) − 24.0 (1.2) − 76.6 (36.8) − 8.7 (2.6)
 P value  < 0.0001 0.038 0.001
 FVC (ml) − 16.0 (1.6) − 37.5 (38.7) − 3.8 (3.5)
 P value  < 0.0001 0.33 0.28
 FEV1/FVC ratio (%) − 0.391(0.026) − 2.013 (0.724) − 0.196 (0.055)
 P value  < 0.0001 0.0055 0.0004

WS woodsmoke

aLinear mixed effects model was used to assess the impact of ever WS exposure on lung function decline through including an interaction term between ever WS exposure and time in cohort. We included fixed effects for baseline age, BMI, height, smoking status, and packyears, sex, and ethnicities, and random effects for intercept and time in cohort.

bCohort was stratified based on a median age of 55.9 year