Table 10. Performance comparison based on BraTS dataset.
No. | Author | Pretext task | Category | Random init.: DSC (%) | SSL: DSC (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Zhou et al. (2019) | Models Genesis | Generative | 90.68 | 92.58 |
2 | Taleb et al. (2021) | Jigsaw Puzzle | Predictive | 80.54 | 89.74 |
3 | Zhu et al. (2020a) | Rubik Cube+ | Predictive | 85.47 | 89.6 |
4 | Chen et al. (2019) | Context Restoration | Generative | 84.41 | 85.57 |
5 | Zhang et al. (2020) | Scale Aware Rest. | Multi-Tasking | 74.35 | 84.92 |
6 | Chen et al. (2019) | Image Inpainting* | Generative | 84.41 | 84.54 |
7 | Taleb et al. (2020) | 3D Relative Pos. Pred. | Predictive | 76.38 | 81.28 |
8 | Taleb et al. (2020) | 3D CPC | Contrastive | 76.38 | 80.83 |
9 | Taleb et al. (2020) | 3D Rotation | Predictive | 76.38 | 80.21 |
10 | Taleb et al. (2020) | 3D Jigsaw | Predictive | 76.38 | 79.66 |
11 | Taleb et al. (2020) | 3D Exemplar | Predictive | 76.38 | 79.46 |