Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 5;23(17):10148. doi: 10.3390/ijms231710148

Table 1.

The effect of rosavin treatment on liver function and lipid profile.

NC NASH RSV-10 RSV-20 RSV-30
AST (IU/L) 21.17 ± 6.43 149.7 ± 36.49 * 88.17 ± 10.68 # 57.67 ± 5.78 #a 36.17 ± 5.04 #a
ALT (IU/L) 10.1 ± 3.62 179.2 ± 38.86 * 83.05 ± 7.85 # 45 ± 12.31 #a 20.83 ± 6.11 #a
T. bilirubin (mg/dL) 0.3967 ± 0.16 3.767 ± 0.47 * 2.65 ± 0.27 # 1.635 ± 0.14 #a 0.715 ± 0.19 #ab
D. bilirubin (mg/dL) 0.2133 ± 0.08 2.567 ± 0.42 * 1.7 ± 0.33 # 1.042 ± 0.15 #a 0.495 ± 0.16 #ab
Albumin (g/dL) 3.67 ± 0.37 1.68 ± 0.28 * 2.03 ± 0.25 2.60 ± 0.17 #a 3.13 ± 0.49 #a
AFP (ng/mL) 19.65 ± 3.43 540.2 ± 108.2 * 221.7 ± 32.16 # 92.75 ± 20.5 #a 29 ± 7.13 #a
TG (mg/dL) 45.67 ± 4.89 173.7 ± 19.93 * 104 ± 22.09 # 73.83 ± 11.44 #a 55.17 ± 5.19 #a
TC (mg/dL) 106.6 ± 13.92 228.1 ± 8.81 * 195.9 ± 7.90 # 171.7 ± 6.93 #a 118.2 ± 18.75 #ab
HDL-C (mg/dL) 53.33 ± 3.72 21.67 ± 3.44 * 33.33 ± 1.97 # 38.17 ± 1.17 # 45.5 ±3.51 #ab
LDL-C (mg/dL) 40.17 ± 10.5 171.7 ± 7.61 * 144.3 ± 8.48 # 114.3 ± 12.14 #a 72.17 ± 9.54 #ab

Values are mean ± SD; number of animals = 8 rats/each group. * p < 0.001 compared to normal control group (NC). # p < 0.001 compared to NASH group, a p < 0.05 compared to Rosavin-10, b p < 0.05 compared to RSV-20. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test.