Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 29;11(17):5077. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175077

Table 2.

Accuracy of the LIAISON® Meridian H. pylori SA test in treatment-naïve patients.

Comparison SAT vs. UBT Sensitivity
(95% CI)
Specificity
(95% CI)
PPV
(95% CI)
NPV
(95% CI)
LR+
(95% CI)
LR−
(95% CI)
Global Accuracy
(95% CI)
AUC
(95% CI)
Naïve 74% (59–88) 96% (92–100) 89% (77–100) 90% (84–96) 19 (7–51) 0.27 (0.16–0.45) 90% (84–95) 0.88 (0.80–0.96)
NDIRS naïve 73% (54–92) 93% (86–100) 83% (65–100) 89% (80–97) 11 (4–29) 0.29 (0.15–0.55) 87% (80–95) 0.86 (0.75–0.96)
IRMS naïve 75% (51–99) 100% (99–100) 100% (96–100) 92% (82–100) - 0.25 (0.11–0.58) 93% (86–100) 0.91 (0.79–1.0)

SAT: stool antigen test; UBT: urea breath test; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; LR+: positive likelihood ratio; LR−: negative likelihood ratio; AUC: area under the ROC curve; IRMS: isotope ratio mass spectrometry, cut-off value 5‰; NDIRS: non-dispersive isotope-selective infrared spectrometry, cut-off value 2.5‰.