Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 29;11(17):5077. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175077

Table 3.

Accuracy of the LIAISON® Meridian H. pylori SA test in post-treatment patients.

Comparison SAT vs. UBT Sensitivity
(95% CI)
Specificity
(95% CI)
PPV
(95% CI)
NPV
(95% CI)
LR+
(95% CI)
LR−
(95% CI)
Global Accuracy
(95% CI)
AUC
(95% CI)
Post-treatment 55% (31–78) 98% (95–100) 80% (56–100) 93% (89–98) 25 (8–82) 0.46 (0.29–0.73) 92% (87–96) 0.79 (0.65–0.93)
NDIRS post-treatment 53 % (26–80) 99% (96–100) 90% (66–100) 91% (85–98) 46 (6–336) 0.48 (0.29–0.79) 91% (85–97) 0.81 (0.67–0.95)
IRMS post-treatment 60% (7–100) 96% (90–100) 60% (7–100) 96% (90–100) 16 (3–75) 0.42 (0.14–1.22) 93% (86–100) 0.78 (0.44–1.0)

SAT: stool antigen test; UBT: urea breath test; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; LR+: positive likelihood ratio; LR−: negative likelihood ratio; AUC: area under the ROC curve; IRMS: isotope ratio mass spectrometry, cut-off value 5‰; NDIRS: non-dispersive isotope-selective infrared spectrometry, cut-off value 2.5‰.