Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 31;12(3):138–147. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1755332

Table 4. Statistical analysis of the differential distribution the percentage of item without violations (flaws) after clustering of the resources into C1, C2, C3, and C4.

Overall items violations Good items a (%) One flaw (%) >1 flaw (%) Structural violations No flaws (%) One flaw (%) >1 flaw (%)
C1: study book–related MCQs 16 39 45 C1: study book–related MCQs 69 17 14
C2: review book–related MCQs 10 26 64 C2: review book–related MCQs 42 37 21
C3: self-assessment books b 38 25 37 C3: self-assessment books b 66 22 12
C4: online-shared MCQs 7 21 72 C4: online-shared MCQs 44 32 24
χ2 (KW) = 190.54, p  = 0.000 χ2 (KW) = 92.4, p  = 0.000
Test-wiseness violations No flaws (%) One flaw (%) >1 flaw (%) Irrelevant difficulty violations No flaws (%) One flaw (%) >1 flaw (%)
C1: study book–related MCQs 87 12 1 C1: study book–related MCQs 25 55 20
C2: review book–related MCQs 75 22 3 C2: review book–related MCQs 32 33 35
C3: self-assessment books b 90 9 1 C3: self-assessment books b 54 33 13
C4: online-shared MCQs 86 13 1 C4: online-shared MCQs 11 53 36
χ2 (KW) = 36, p  = 0.000 χ2 (KW) = 237, p  = 0.014

Abbreviations: MCQ, multiple-choice question.

Note: χ 2 (KW) Kruskal–Wallis H -test.

a

Items without any flaw (violation).

b

Highly significant ( p  < 0.01).