Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 27;26(4):102381. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2022.102381

Table 6.

Sensitivity and 95% CIs of diagnostic techniques and resistance detection in the groups stratified by the biopsy collection site.

Biopsy Collection Site
Test Earlobe (n = 23) Lesion (n = 33) p-value Adjusted p-Value⁎⁎
PCR RLEP
PureLink Kit 12 (52.17%)
(32,96-70,76)
22 (66.67%)
(49.61-80.25)
0.415 0.491
Nucleospin TXS 10 (43.48%)
(25.63-63.19)
21 (63.64%)
(46.62-77.81)
0.223 0.269
Complementary sensitivity*
folP1 10 (43.48%)
(25.36-63.19)
17 (51.52%)
(35.22–67.50)
0.749 0.942
rpoB 9 (39.13%)
(22.16-59.21)
17 (51.52%)
(35.22-67.50)
0.521 0.795
gyrA 7 (30.43%)
(15.60-50.87)
14 (42.42%)
(27.24-59.19)
0.528 0.879

For the sensitivity calculation, we considered a result positive if either of the extraction kits resulted in the amplification of the target gene sequence.

⁎⁎

p-values were adjusted for BIs using a logistic regression model.

PureLink, PureLink Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA); Nucleospin TXS, NucleoSpin Tissue XS (Macherey-Nagel, GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany); folP1, dapsone resistance-associated target; rpoB, rifampicin resistance-associated target; gyrA, quinolone resistance-associated target.