Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 12;113(9):3097–3109. doi: 10.1111/cas.15398

TABLE 2.

KRAS mutation status and survival among patients with pancreatic cancer

Disease‐free survival Overall survival
No. of cases No. of events Univariable HR (95% CI) Multivariable HR a (95% CI) No. of cases No. of events Univariable HR (95% CI) Multivariable HR a (95% CI)
KRAS mutation
Wild type 23 15 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent) 23 13 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent)
Mutant 1072 850 1.23 (0.74–2.05) 1.04 (0.62–1.75) 1125 799 1.26 (0.73–2.19) 1.05 (0.60–1.84)
p value 0.43 0.87 0.40 0.86
KRAS VAF
1%–9% 258 189 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent) 269 172 1.00 (referent) 1.00 (referent)
10%–19% 479 374 1.22 (1.02–1.45) 1.22 (1.02–1.45) 498 348 1.27 (1.05–1.52) 1.19 (0.99–1.44)
≥20% 335 287 1.63 (1.35–1.96) 1.60 (1.32–1.93) 358 279 1.70 (1.40–2.05) 1.52 (1.25–1.85)
p trend b <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; VAF, variant allele frequency.

a

The multivariable Cox regression model initially included age, sex, year of diagnosis, tumor location, histological type, stroma type, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, neural invasion, cancer stage, resection margin status, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. Backward elimination with a threshold p of 0.05 was conducted to select variables for the final models. The variables that remained in the final models are described in Table S2.

b

p trend was calculated by entering KRAS VAF (continuous) in the Cox regression model.