Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug;11(8):1567–1577. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-1004

Table 1. Patient and tumor characteristics.

Subject Age (years) Sex Lesion size (cm) Depth from pleural surface (cm) GGO type SUV Location Segment Visualized by white light imaging Visualized by RIMI Diagnosis Wedge resection margin (cm) Operation performed
1 66 F 1.2 0 Pure GGO 2.9 RLL Lateral basal + + Invasive adenocarcinoma 0.8 Completion lobectomy
2 84 M 2.2 0.3 GGO with solid component 10.8 RLL Posterior basal + + Squamous cell carcinoma 0.4 Completion lobectomy
3 78 F 1.2 0.9 Pure GGO 0 RLL Lateral basal - + Invasive adenocarcinoma 1.0 Completion lobectomy
4 61 F 1.0 0.4 GGO with solid component 0 LLL Antero-medial basal + + Invasive adenocarcinoma 1.3 Wedge resection
5 56 F 1.7 0.6 GGO with solid component 11.2 RUL Anterior + + Invasive adenocarcinoma 0.7 Completion lobectomy
6 74 M 1.0 1.3 Pure GGO 0.8 LUL Superior lingular + Adenocarcinoma in Situ 1.8 Wedge resection
7 62 F 1.5 0.7 GGO with solid component 3.4 RUL Apical + + Invasive adenocarcinoma 0.2 Completion lobectomy
8 69 F 2.0 0.4 GGO with solid component 0.1 LUL Anterior + + Invasive adenocarcinoma 0.2 Completion lobectomy
9 69 M 2.5 0.6 GGO with solid component 1.3 LLL Superior + + Invasive adenocarcinoma n/a* Lobectomy
10 60 F 1.0 1.0 Pure GGO 0.2 LUL Apico-posterior + Minimally invasive adenocarcinoma 1.4 Wedge resection

*, this patient did not undergo sublobar resection and proceeded directly to lobectomy. GGO, ground glass opacity; SUV, standardized uptake value; RUL, right upper lobe; RLL, right lower lobe; LLL, left lower lobe; LUL, left upper lobe; RIMI, intraoperative molecular imaging during robotic-assisted thoracic surgery.