Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 26;11(17):2219. doi: 10.3390/plants11172219

Table 2.

Effects of spraying ethephon on internode length (cm) of summer maize.

Year Treatment 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
2020 LCK 7.5 bc 10.3 c 13.4 c 15.5 d 17.4 cd
MCK 8.2 b 11.6 b 14.2 b 16.7 b 18.4 b
ME 6.9 c 10.0 c 12.9 c 15.5 d 16.7 d
HCK 9.4 a 12.8 a 15.4 a 18.0 a 19.5 a
HE 7.8 b 10.4 c 13.0 c 16.0 c 17.7 bc
2021 LCK 5.9 b 9.2 c 12.0 c 14.0 c 15.4 cd
MCK 6.3 b 10.4 b 13.5 b 15.3 b 16.5 b
ME 5.8 b 8.9 c 11.9 c 13.8 c 14.9 d
HCK 7.4 a 11.5 a 14.5 a 16.1 a 17.9 a
HE 6.2 b 9.0 c 12.0 c 13.9 c 15.7 b
ANOVA
Year (Y) ** ** ** ** **
Density (D) ** ** ** ** **
Ethephon (E) ** ** ** ** **
Y × D ns ns ns ns ns
Y × E ns ns ns ns ns
D × E ns ** ** ** ns
Y × D × E ns ns ns ns ns

LCK, MCK, ME, HCK and HE were the treatments of low density control, medium density control, medium density sprayed with ethephon, high density control and high density sprayed with ethephon, respectively. Different lowercase letters in the table indicated significant difference at 5% level. ns, no significance. **, significant at 0.01 probability level.