Table 3.
MSR quality appraisal procedures
| Study Authors | Quality assessment questions | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Total (n%) | |
| Jahangir et al. [42] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 9 (90%) |
| Peprah et al. [46] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 10 (100%) |
| Braun et al. [37] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 8 (80% |
| Dev et al. [38] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 10 (100%) |
| LogIe et al. [44] | Yes | Yes | No | yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | 50 (50%) |
| Ibembe, [41] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 9 (90%) |
| Ong et al. [45] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 9 (90%) |
| Khatun et al. [43] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | 8 (80%) |
| Hirsch-Moverman et al. [40] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 10 (100%) |
| Jennings et al. [29] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 9 (90%) |
| Hampshere et al. [39] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 10 (100) |
| Chang et al. [47] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 9 (90%) |
| Total = 12 | |||||||||||
Key
1. Were the objective(s) or question(s) of the research clearly stated?
2. Was a qualitative approach appropriate for the research question?
3. Was the sampling strategy used appropriate and described?
4. Was the study context clearly described?
5. Was the data collection method appropriate and described?
6. Was the data analysis appropriately described?
7. Does the study adequately address potential ethical issues?
8. Does the study adequately address reflexivity issues?
9. Were the conclusions drawn justified by the findings?
10. Are the findings of the study transferable to my own and other settings?