Table 3.
Included studies in the systematic review.
| Author | Date | Country | Design | Participants | Trimester (n) | Age (year)a | Vitamin D (ng/ml)a | Vit D normal range (ng/ml) | Outcome | Main finding | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | ||||||||||
| Yalcin Bahat et al., 2020 [27] | September 2020 | Turkey | Case-control | 44 confirmed COVID-19 cases | 5 | 12 | 27 | 28.5 | 9.7 ± 59.14 | 30–100 | Incidence | Serum vitamin D levels were significantly lower than normal cut-off ranges (p < 0.001) | 
| Sinaci et al., 2021 [21] | August 2021 | Turkey | Case-control | 159 confirmed COVID-19 cases | Participants are from all trimesters | 29.6 | 12.46 ± 6.46 | Above 30 | Incidence | Serum vitamin D levels were significantly lower in cases (p < 0.001) | ||
| 332 healthy pregnant women | 27.4 | 18.76 ± 13.74 | ||||||||||
| 128 mild COVID-19 cases | Participants are from all trimesters | NR | 13.69 ± 9.72 | Above 30 | Severity | Serum vitamin D levels were significantly higher in mild patients compering to moderate and severe cases (p = 0.041) | ||||||
| 31 moderate & severe COVID-19 cases | NR | 9.06 ± 8.82 | ||||||||||
| Tekin et al., 2021 [20] | October 2021 | Turkey | Prospective case–control | 147 confirmed COVID-19 cases | 17 | 46 | 84 | 27.9 | 14.64 ± 10.72 | Above 50 | Incidence | Serum vitamin D levels were significantly higher in cases (p = 0.001) | 
| 300 healthy pregnant women | NR | NR | NR | 27.9 | 12.52 ± 8.28 | |||||||
| Seven et al., 2021 [30] | November 2021 | Turkey | Cross-sectional | 292 mild COVID-19 cases | 83 | 102 | 107 | 28 | 15.5 ± 7.6 | Above 30 | Severity | Serum vitamin D levels were significantly higher in mild patients compared to severe cases (p = 0.01) | 
| 111 severe COVID-19 cases | 7 | 25 | 79 | 29.5 | 13 ± 8.9 | |||||||
| Moreno-Fernandez et al., 2022 [28] | January 2022 | Spain | Case-control | 63 COVID-19 cases | 0 | 0 | 63 | 31.9 | 21.28 ± 9.52 | NR | Incidence | There is no significant difference between cases and controls (p > 0.05) | 
| 61 healthy pregnant women | 0 | 0 | 61 | 31.5 | 18.54 ± 8.04 | |||||||
| Schmitt et al., 2022 [29] | January 2022 | France | Retrospective cohort | 15 COVID-19 cases | 0 | 0 | 15 | 30 | 10.4 ± 9.1 | Above 30 | Incidence | Serum vitamin D levels were significantly lower in cases (p < 0.05) | 
| 19 healthy pregnant women | 0 | 0 | 19 | 31 | 19.1 ± 6.2 | |||||||
| 7 asymptomatic COVID-19 cases | 0 | 0 | 7 | 30.7 | 13.04 ± 7.95 | Above 30 | Severity | Serum vitamin D levels were significantly lower in symptomatic cases (p < 0.05) | ||||
| 8 symptomatic COVID-19 cases | 0 | 0 | 8 | 29.5 | 10.35 ± 6.12 | |||||||
| Ferrer-Sánchez et al., 2022 [22] | March 2022 | Spain | Case-control | 82 COVID-19 cases | 0 | 0 | 82 | 31 | 10.15 ± 7 | Above 30 | Incidence | Serum vitamin D levels were significantly lower in cases (p = 0.005) | 
| 174 healthy pregnant women | 0 | 0 | 174 | 32 | 13.8 ± 8.5 | |||||||
| 75 mild COVID-19 cases | 0 | 0 | 75 | NR | 10.5 ± 7.26 | Above 30 | Severity | There is no significant difference (p = 0.25) | ||||
| 7 moderate & severe COVID-19 cases | 0 | 0 | 7 | NR | 8.7 ± 2.15 | |||||||
| 78 COVID-19 cases, did not admit to ICU | 0 | 0 | 78 | NR | 10.15 ± 7.1 | Above 30 | Severity | There is no significant difference (p = 0.41) | ||||
| 4 COVID-19 cases, admitted to ICU | 0 | 0 | 4 | NR | 9.3 ± 4.24 | |||||||
Values are mean for age, and mean ± SD for serum vitamin D level.