Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Radiol Prot. 2022 Jun 28;42(2):10.1088/1361-6498/ac7918. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac7918

Table B1:

The difference between the pristine distal 90% dose point of measured Bragg peak curve and the simulated Bragg peak curves for six different physics lists with range cut value as 0.1 mm.

Insert pristine distal 90% dose point difference
|ZmeasZZQGS_FTFP_BERT| |ZmeasZZQGS_BIC_HP| |ZmeasZZQGSBIC| |ZmeasZZQGSBERTHP| |ZmeasZZQGSBERT| |ZmeasZQBBC|
K2HPO4_1 −0.74 −0.761 −0.735 −0.735 −0.738 −0.74
K2HPO4_2 −11.314 −11.333 −11.315 −11.312 −11.309 −11.312
K2HPO4_3 −19.44 −19.454 −19.439 −19.441 −19.437 −19.439
K2HPO4_4 −36.738 −36.748 −36.739 −36.737 −36.74 −36.74
Ethanol −57.374 −57.405 −57.375 −57.377 −57.376 −57.374
Propanol −62.369 −62.397 −62.361 −62.366 −62.368 −62.367
Butanol −54.05 −54.081 −54.054 −54.053 −54.055 −54.055
Acrylic −131.393 −131.412 −131.388 −131.39 −131.389 −131.391
HDPE −146.571 −146.593 −146.57 −146.569 −146.57 −146.571
Delrin −112.676 −112.701 −112.677 −112.677 −112.68 −112.677
PTFE −73.163 −73.186 −73.16 −73.162 −73.163 −73.159