Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 9;101(10):2123–2137. doi: 10.1007/s00277-022-04917-5

Table 2.

Selected subgroup analyses from isatuximab and daratumumab randomized phase 3 trials in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone

Subgroup ICARIA-MM 48,69,70
Isa-Pd vs. Pd
APOLLO 61,68
Dara-Pd vs. Pd
PFS HR (95% CI) Pinteraction PFS HR (95% CI) Pinteraction
Age 0.5952 NR
  < 65 yr 0.66 (0.40–1.07) 0.69 (0.44–1.09)
   ≥ 65 yr 65–74 yr: 0.64 (0.39–1.06) ≥ 75 yr: 0.48 (0.24–0.95) 0.55 (0.38–0.81)
Previous lines of therapy 0.9583 NR
  1 a 0.70 (0.30–1.67)
  2–3 0.59 (0.40–0.88) 0.66 (0.48–0.92)
  > 3 0.59 (0.36–0.98) 0.40 (0.18–0.90)
Baseline renal functionb

eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)

 ≥ 60: 0.58 (0.38–0.88)

 < 60: 0.50 (0.30–0.85)

0.7575

CrCl (mL/min)

 > 60: 0.64 (0.45–0.90)

 ≤ 60: 0.59 (0.35–0.99)

NR
Cytogenetic riskc 0.9990 NR
  High risk 0.66 (0.33–1.28) 0.85 (0.49–1.44)
  Standard risk 0.62 (0.42–0.93) 0.51 (0.32–0.81)
Soft-tissue plasmacytomas 0.22 (0.07–0.69) NR NA
Gain 1q21 0.50 (0.28–0.88) NR NA

CI, confidence interval; CrCl, creatinine clearance; d, dexamethasone; Dara, daratumumab; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR, hazard ratio; Isa, isatuximab; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; NA, not analyzed; NR, not reported; P, pomalidomide; PFS, progression-free survival; yr, year

The differences in patient characteristics between the studies and limited sample size in the subgroup

Analyses prevent comparisons across trials

aAll patients in ICARIA-MM had received at least 2 lines of prior therapy

bMeasured as estimated glomerular filtration rate (by MDRD equation) in ICARIA-MM and as creatinine clearance (method not specified) in APOLLO

cBased on fluorescence in situ hybridization; high risk defined as del(17p), t(4;14), or t(4;16)