Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 10;8:203. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01161-6

Table 4.

The proportion of the patients with potential inappropriate prescribing at baseline, 6, and 9 months

Intervention Control % point difference (95% CI) ICCa
Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP; STOPP and START combined)
Baseline n (%) n = 31 27 (87.1) n = 25 20 (80.0)
6 months n (%) n = 24 21 (87.5) n = 25 20 (80.0) 7.5 (−13.0, 28.0) 0.0889
9 months n (%) n = 24 21 (87.5) n = 23 20 (87.0) 0.5 (−18.6, 19.6) 0.0000
Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs; STOPP)
Baseline n (%) n = 31 21 (67.7) n = 25 14 (56.0)
6 months n (%) n = 24 14 (58.3) n = 25 15 (60.0) −1.7 (−29.2, 25.9) 0.0000
9 months n (%) n = 24 16 (66.7) n = 23 15 (65.2) 1.5 (−25.7, 28.6) 0.0000
Potential prescribing omissions (PPOs; START)
Baseline n (%) n = 31 20 (64.5) n = 25 16 (64.0)
6 months n (%) n = 24 17 (70.8) n = 25 14 (56.0) 14.8 (−11.8, 41.5) 0.1395
9 months n (%) n = 24 17 (70.8) n = 23 13 (56.5) 14.3 (−12.9, 41.5) 0.0952

CI confidence intervals, ICC intraclass correlation coefficient. No. (%) presented for patients with at least one instance of PIP, PIMs or PPOs

aICCs from mixed-effects models with site as a random effect