Skip to main content
. 2022 May 14;3(4):358–367. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.004

Table 2.

Left bundle branch area pacing procedural outcomes in patient with right bundle branch block at baseline

Procedural outcomes
Total number of successful cases 107 (88)
Device indication
 Primary CRT indication 48 (45)
 Pacing indication 48 (45)
 RV pacing–induced cardiomyopathy 5 (5)
 AV node ablation 6 (6)
Procedure duration (min) 97 ± 48
Fluoroscopy duration (min) 16 ± 12
Type of device
 CRT pacemaker 12 (11)
 Dual-chamber pacemaker 47 (44)
 Single-chamber pacemaker 11 (10)
 CRT defibrillator 34 (32)
 Dual-chamber defibrillator 3 (3)
Pacing characteristics Baseline Follow-up P value
R-wave amplitude (mV) 10 ± 9 13 ± 5 .08
Impedance (Ω) 635 ± 179 478 ± 116 <.01
LBBAP threshold (V at 0.5 ms) 0.8 ± 0.3 0.7 ± 0.3 .38
Stimulus to peak LV activation time (ms) 85 ± 16
LBBAP pacing burden (%) 95 ± 8

Values are mean ± SD or n (%).

P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.

AV = atrioventricular; CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy; LBBAP = left bundle branch area pacing; LV = left ventricle; RV = right ventricle.

Underlying right bundle branch block in sinus bradycardia, AV block, or prior to AV node ablation.