Skip to main content
. 2022 May 16;3(4):396–404. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.006

Table 2.

Procedural characteristics

Study Number of sessions Endocardial energy source Surgical approach Endocardial lesions
DeLurgio et al 202010 Single setting RF TD: 66%
SubX: 34%
PVI: 100%
PV touch-up/common PV ablation: 38%
CTI: 96%
MTI: 2%
Linear/focal touch-up to address gaps around PV reflections: 13%
Makati et al 202022 Single setting Cryo TD: 71%
SubX: 29%
CTI (with RF): 100%
Maclean et al 202021 Staged by ∼6 weeks RF TD: 93%
SubX: 7%
PVI: 100%
CTI: 67.4%
CFAE: 55.8%
Roof: 41.9%
MTI: 13.9%
Other: 30.2%
Gulkarov et al 201918 Single setting RF TD: 100% PVI: 100%
CFAE: 2%
CTI: 61%
MTI, anterior LA line, LA roof line: 52%
Larson et al 202020 Mostly single setting RF: 83%
Cryo: 12%
RF/Cryo: 4%
TD: 54%
SubX: 46%
NR
Tonks et al 201919 Single setting: 89%
Staged by 1 day: 11%
RF TD: 31%
SubX: 69%
LAA exclusion: 36%
PVI: 100%
Roof line: 100%
RA flutter line: 50%
LA flutter line: 14%
RA and LA flutter line: 5%

CFAE = complex fractionated atrial electrograms; Cryo = cryoballoon; CTI = cavotriscuspid isthmus; LA = left atrial; LAA = left atrial appendage; NR = not reported; PV = pulmonary vein; PVI = pulmonary vein isolation; RA = right atrial; RF = radiofrequency; SubX = subxiphoid; TD = transdiaphragmatic.