. 2022 Apr 4;223:106153. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106153

Table 4.

Series of factor analysis and fit indices.

Models	Factors	χ2	Df	χ2/df	Δχ2	RMSEA	GFI	CFI	TLI
Model 1	5Factors: PAPIST₁₉, HSC, JR, EE, JE	1724.01	968	1.78	–	.05	.98	.93	.93
Model 2	4 Factors: PAPIST₁₉, HSC, JR, EE	945.3	419	2.25	1328.6	.06	.83	.91	.92
Model 3	3 Factors: PAPIST₁₉, JR, JE	912.4	309	2.95	1121.9	.09	.85	.81	.88
Model 3	2 Factor: HSC, JE	668.2	188	3.55	900.7	.10	.79	.74	.62
*Structural Model*	*PAPIST₁₉, HSC, JR, EE, JE, age, gender, SC, Neu*	*11.85*	5	*2.36*	*----*	*.06*	*.95*	*.97*	*.98*

Note: PAPIST19D = post-C19 psychological distress, HSC = health support climate, JR = job reattachment, EE = emotional exhaustion, JE = job engagement, SC, Consciousness, Neu = Neuroticism, χ2 = Chi-Square, df = degree of freedom, RMSEA = root mean square error approximation, GFI = Goodness of fit index, CFI, comparative fit index, TLI = Tucker-Lewis index.