Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 7;12(9):2077–2085. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00764-4

Table 2.

Response to abrocitinib treatment at week 12 and maintenance of response at week 16

Responders at week 12, n (%) Maintained response at week 16, n Did not maintain response at week 16, n Total assessed for response maintenance, n Maintained response at week 16, %
EASI-50 (N = 109)a
 Placebo 14 (12.8) 8 0 8 100
 Abrocitinib 100 mg 30 (27.5) 14 13 27 51.9
 Abrocitinib 200 mg 38 (34.9) 24 7 31 77.4
EASI-75 (N = 75)a
 Placebo 8 (10.7) 6 1 7 85.7
 Abrocitinib 100 mg 22 (29.3) 7 13 20 35.0
 Abrocitinib 200 mg 31 (41.3) 11 15 26 42.3
IGA (N = 49)a
 Placebo 3 (6.1) 2 0 2 100.0
 Abrocitinib 100 mg 16 (32.7) 5 10 15 33.3
 Abrocitinib 200 mg 21 (42.9) 4 15 19 21.1
Pruritus NRS4 (N = 91)a
 Placebo 13 (14.3) 5 1 6 83.3
 Abrocitinib 100 mg 25 (27.5) 10 13 23 43.5
 Abrocitinib 200 mg 28 (30.8) 9 12 21 42.9

EASI-50, EASI-75 50% and 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index, respectively, IGA Investigator’s Global Assessment, pruritus NRS4 4-point or greater improvement in baseline pruritus numeric rating scale score

aThe number of total responders at week 12 includes patients who received abrocitinib 10 mg and 30 mg