Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 28;27:1869–1881. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.026

Table 8.

Linguistic assessment of the suppliers.

Suppliers Experts Best Worst C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
Supplier 1 Expert1 VP P G G M VP G
Expert2 P G M M G G G
Expert3 P VP M M G G VG
Expert4 G P G G M VG M
Expert5 G VP G M M G G
Supplier 2 Expert1 M VP G G G M M
Expert2 G G VG G M M G
Expert3 G G M M G VG VG
Expert4 M VG M G G G G
Expert5 M G M M G G VG
Supplier 3 Expert1 G G G M G M M
Expert2 VG G M M G M M
Expert3 M M M G M M G
Expert4 M G VG VG G VG VG
Expert5 M G G G G G G
Supplier 4 Expert1 G G G M G G M
Expert2 G M M M G M M
Expert3 M M G VG M G VG
Expert4 G VG G G G G G
Expert5 G G G G G G G
Supplier 5 Expert1 P G M M G M VP
Expert2 G M M M G G G
Expert3 VP M G G M G G
Expert4 P G VG VG G M VG
Expert5 VP G G G G M G
Supplier 6 Expert1 M VP G M M G M
Expert2 G G M M M G G
Expert3 G G M G G M G
Expert4 M VG G VG VG G M
Expert5 M G G G G G M
Supplier 7 Expert1 M M VP M M G M
Expert2 G G G M M G G
Expert3 G G G G G M G
Expert4 M M VG VG VG G M
Expert5 M M G G G G M