Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 29;10:917781. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.917781

Table 5.

Comparison of the reported prevalence of refractive errors in selected population-based studies in school children and adolescents in mainland China.

References Area Sample size Survey year Age rage (years) Study area Definition for REs Prevalence of myopia Prevalence of hyperopia Prevalence of astigmatism Prevalence of Anisometropia
Wu et al. (23) 12 cities* 43,771 N.A 11.45 ± 2.65 R+U Questionnaires 25.7% (R) vs. 38% (U) N.A N.A N.A
He et al. (24) Yangxi 2,400 2005 13–17 R Myopia SE ≤ -0.50 D; Hyperopia SE > +2.00 D; Astigmatism: cylinder of > or = 0.75 D (Cycloplegia) 33.0 1.0 25.3 N.A
Wu et al. (19) Shandong# 6,026 2013 4–18 R+U Myopia: SE ≤ −0.50 D; Mild Hyperopia +0.5D < SE ≤ +2.0 D; Medium to Marked Hyperopia SE > +2.0 D; Astigmatism: cylindrical RE ≥ 0.75 D; Anisometropia: difference between right eye to left eye in SE of ≥ 1.0 D (Cycloplegia) 30.7 (R) vs 43.5 (U) Mild: 49.2 (R) vs. 35.9 (U); Medium to Marked: 6.4 (R) vs. 5.2 (U) 32.1 (R) vs. 40.7 (U) 6.1 (R) vs. 7.9 (U)
You et al. (17) Beijing 15,066 N.A. 7–18 R+U SE ≤ −0.50 D (Cycloplegia) 64.9 (overall) NA NA NA
Pan et al. (25) Mojiang 4,778 7.7–13.8 R SE < −0.5 D (Cycloplegia) 29.4% (7.7 y) 2.4% (13.8 y) NA NA NA
Congdon et al. (26) Xichang 1,892 2007 11.4–17.1 U SE < −0.5 D (Cycloplegic) 62.3% NA NA NA
Guo et al. (27) Ejina 1,565 2012 6–21 R SE ≤ −0.50 D (Cycloplegic) 60.0% NA NA NA
He et al. (21) Guanghzou 4,364 2002–2003 5–15 U Myopia SE ≤ −0.50 D; Hyperopia SE > +2.00 D; Astigmatism: cylinder of > or = 0.75 D (autorefraction under cycloplegia) 78.4 1% 42.7% NA
Li et al. (28) Anyang 4,861 2011 5–16 U Myopia SE ≤ −0.50 D; Hyperopia SE > +2.00 D; (Cycloplegia) 3.9% (5–6 y); 67.3% (15- 16 y) 23.3% (grade 1); 1.2% (grade 7) NA NA
Li et al. (29) Heilongjiang 1,675 2008–2009 5–18 U Myopia SE ≤ −0.50 D; Hyperopia SE > +0.50 D; Astigmatism: cylinder of > or = 0.75 D (Cycloplegia) 5.0% 1.6% 2.0% N.A
Chen et al. (30) Fenghua 43,858 2001–2015 17–18 U Myopia SE ≤ −0.50 D; (Without Cycloplegia) 79.5% (2001); 87.7% (2015) NA NA NA
Sun et al. (31) Qingdao 3,753 2015–2016 10–15 U Myopia SE < −0.50 D (Cycloplegia) 52.02% NA NA NA
Guo et al. (32) Beijing 35,745 2016 6–18 R+U Myopia SE < −0.50 D (Without cycloplegia) 70.9% NA NA NA
Ma et al. (33) Shanghai 8,267 2013 10 U Myopia SE ≤ −0.50 D; Hyperopia SE > +0.50 D; (Cycloplegia) 52.2% 2.6% NA NA
Guo et al. (34) Guangzhou 3,055 2014 6–15 U Myopia SE ≤ −0.50 D; (Cycloplegia) 47.3% NA NA NA
Lyu et al. (35) Beijing 4,249 2011 5–14 U Myopia SE ≤ −0.50 D; (Cycloplegia) 36.7% NA NA NA
Wu et al. (36) Beijing 4,677 N.A. 16–18 U Myopia SE ≤ −1.00 D; (Without cycloplegia) 80.7% NA NA NA
Pi et al. (37) Yongchuan 3,070 2006–2007 6–15 R Myopia SE ≤ −0.50 D; Hyperopia SE ≥+2.00 D; Astigmatism: cylinder of > or = 1.0 D (Cycloplegia) 13.75% 3.26% 3.75% NA

*Beijing, Shaoxing, Shenzhen, Chongqing, Guizhou, Taiyuan, Ma'anshan, Shenyang, Urumqi, Changsha, Yinchuan and Zhengzhou.

#Weihai (urban), Guanxian (rural).

Statistical significant, P < 0.05.

REs, refractive errors; U, urban; R, rural; SE, spherical equivalence; D, dioptres; NA, not applicable.