Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 1;57:101150. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101150

Table 5.

Comparison of factor analysis models applied to the VGAQ.

Model χ2 (df) P-value RMSEA (90% CI) BIC CFI SRMR ΔBIC ΔCFI
Sex* 0.000
Configural 741.21 (18) 0.000 0.103 (0.097, 0.110) 135492 0.955 0.034
Metric 824.96 (23) 0.000 0.096 (0.091, 0.102) 135531 0.950 0.045 39 0.005
Scalar 998.07 (28) 0.000 0.096 (0.091, 0.101) 135659 0.939 0.053 128 0.011
Race**
Configural 420.07 (54) 0.000 0.104 (0.095, 0.114) 68714 0.961 0.032
Metric 450.48 (79) 0.000 0.087 (0.079, 0.095) 68539 0.961 0.038 175 0.000
Scalar 500.16 (104) 0.000 0.078 (0.072, 0.085) 68383 0.958 0.041 156 0.003
Income***
Configural 738.43 (27) 0.000 0.107 (0.100, 0.113) 125547 0.957 0.033
Metric 758.42 (37) 0.000 0.092 (0.086, 0.98) 125479 0.956 0.037 68 0.001
Scalar 807.85 (47( 0.000 0.084 (0.079, 0.089) 125440 0.954 0.038 39 0.002

*Sex (female, male)

**Race (white, black, AIAN, Asian, mixed, other)

***Income (<$50,000, $50,000-$100,000, >$100,000