Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 10;8:20552076221124432. doi: 10.1177/20552076221124432

Table 1.

A summary of related automated systems for facial disease diagnosis along with their limitations.

Article Dataset Abnormality Method Results Limitation
Kong et al., 2018 20 1123 Patients (private) Acromegaly
  • Open CV for face detection.

  • Facial locations landmarks as features.

  • Fronatization.

  • SVM, LR, K-NN, CNN, and RF ensemble classifiers.

Precision = 96%
Sensitivity = 96%
Specificity = 96%
  • Detect only one type of disease (binary classification).

  • Used manual segmentation.

  • Detect the face for diagnosis (controlled face diagnosis).

  • Utilized only Facial location landmarks as features.

  • Used only spatial features.

  • Used only handcrafted features.

  • Did not use DL features.

Schneider et al. 21 117 Patients (private) Acromegaly
  • Geometric and Gabor filter feature extraction methods.

  • FIDA (facial image diagnostic aid) software

Accuracy = 81.9%
  • Detect only one type of disease (binary classification).

  • Used only handcrafted features.

  • Did not use DL features.

  • Controlled face diagnosis.

  • Very small dataset.

  • Private dataset.

  • Low accuracy.

  • Used commercial software to perform diagnosis.

  • Large feature space.

Meng et al. 22 124 Patients (private) Acromegaly
  • 35 Anatomical facial landmarks,

  • 55 Angular, index, and linear features,

  • Geometric features.

  • LDA classifier

Accuracy = 92.86%
  • Detect only one type of disease (binary classification).

  • Used only handcrafted features.

  • Did not use DL features.

  • Controlled face diagnosis.

  • Very small dataset.

  • Private dataset.

  • Large feature space.

Zhao et al. 23 48 Patients (private) Down syndrome
  • Geometric, contourlet transform, and LBP features.

  • SVM classifier

Accuracy = 97.9%
Precision = 100%
Sensitivity = 95.8%
  • Detect only one type of disease (binary classification).

  • Used only handcrafted features.

  • Did not use DL features.

  • Controlled face diagnosis.

  • Very small dataset.

  • Private dataset.

  • Large feature space.

Zhao et al. 24 100 Patients (private) Down syndrome
  • HCLM, geometric, and textural features

  • ICA

  • SVM classifier

Accuracy = 95.6%
Precision = 95.3%
Sensitivity = 95.3%
  • Detect only one type of disease (binary classification).

  • Used only handcrafted features.

  • Did not use DL features.

  • Controlled face diagnosis.

  • Very small dataset.

  • Private dataset.

Zhao et al. 25 130
Patients (private)
Down syndrome
  • HCLM, geometric, Gabor, and LBP features

  • ICA

  • LDA classifier

Accuracy = 96.7%
  • Detect only one type of disease (binary classification).

  • Used only handcrafted features.

  • Did not use DL features.

  • Controlled face diagnosis.

  • Very small dataset.

  • Private dataset.

24 Patients (private) 14 Dysmorphic
syndromes
  • HCLM, geometric, Gabor, and LBP features

  • ICA

  • SVM classifier

Accuracy = 97%
  • Used only handcrafted features.

  • Did not use DL features.

  • Controlled face diagnosis.

  • Very small dataset.

  • Private dataset.

  • Large feature space.

Lui et al. 26 87 Images (private) Autism
  • K means and histogram features.

  • SVM classifier

Accuracy = 88.51%
Sensitivity = 93.1%
Specificity = 86.1%
  • Detect only one type of disease (binary classification).

  • Used only handcrafted features.

  • Used only spatial features.

  • Did not use DL features.

  • Controlled face diagnosis.

  • Very small dataset.

  • Private dataset.

  • Relatively low accuracy.

Sajid et al. 27 2000 Images Palsy
  • GAN for augmentation.

  • VGG-16 and CNN for feature extraction.

  • CNN for classification

Accuracy = 92.6%
Sensitivity = 93.14%
Precision = 92.91%
  • Grade only one type of disease.

  • Used only spatial features.

  • Controlled face diagnosis.

  • Used individual feature extraction to perform classification.

  • Utilized individual classifiers to perform classification.

  • Large feature space.

Guo et al. 28 1840 Images (private) UPFP
  • Dlib

  • DAN

AUC = 60.66%
  • Detect only one type of disease (binary classification).

  • Used only spatial features.

  • Controlled face diagnosis.

  • Private dataset.

  • Low performance.

  • Large feature space.

Kuan Wang and Jiebo Luo 29 8509 Images 20 Diseases
  • Manually segmented symptoms.

  • Used binary features

  • Employed color features, Hough transform,

  • k means clustering

Accuracy = 80.2%
Sensitivity = 77.2%
Precision = 82.1%
  • Used manual segmentation to crop the abnormality.

  • Used only handcrafted features.

  • Did not use DL features.

  • Controlled face diagnosis.

  • Very small dataset.

  • Relatively low performance.

  • Unbalanced dataset.

  • Large feature space.

 Gurovich et al. 30  26,692 Images (private) 216 Syndromes
  • DeepGestalt model (holistic + local + CNN features extraction methods)

  • CNN for classification

Top-10-accuracy = 91%
  • Utilized individual classifiers to perform classification.

  • Public only for health professionals.

  • Private dataset.

Pantel et al. 31 646 Images 17 Syndromes and normal faces (binary classification)
  • DeepGestalt model

AUC = 89%
  • Utilized individual classifiers to perform classification.

  • Public only for health professionals.

  • Private dataset.

  • Performed binary classification.

Jin et al. 16 350 Images
(public)
4 Diseases
  • Open CV (HOG + SVM)

  • AlexNet, ResNet-50, VGG-16

  • SVM

Accuracy = 93.3%
  • Used only spatial features.

  • Utilized individual spatial DL features.

  • Utilized individual classifiers.

  • Employed a large number of features to perform classification.

Beta-thalassemia   Accuracy = 95%
Sensitivity = 100%
Specificity = 90%
Precision = 90.9%

Note. SVM: support vector machine; LR: logistic regression; K-NN: k-nearest neighbor; CNN: convolutional neural networks; LDA: linear discriminate analysis; HCLM: Hierarchical Constrained Local Model; ICA: independent component analysis; LBP: local binary pattern; GAN: generative adversarial network; DAN: deep alignment network.