Table 2.
Results of ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post-hoc comparisons.
| ANOVA | Post-hoc tests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
| Outcome | F | p | Baseline vs. Pre-APT | Pre-APT vs. Post-APT | Post-APT vs. Follow-up |
| SH | 97.128 | <0.001 | 1.000 | <0.001 (ES:1.09) | 1.000 |
| SJ | 14.953 | <0.001 | 1.000 | 0.045 (ES: 0.76) | 0.340 |
| CMJ | 9.130 | <0.001 | 0.821 | 0.156 | 1.000 |
| EUR | 2.526 | 0.074 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.311 |
| CMJA | 16.453 | <0.001 | 1.000 | <0.001 (ES: 0.78) | 1.000 |
Abbreviations: APT: aquatic plyometric training; SH: spike height; SJ: squat jump; CMJ: countermovement jump; EUR: eccentric utilization ratio; CMJA: countermovement jump with an arm swing; ES: effect size (Hedges’ g).