Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 12;2022(9):CD011376. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011376.pub3

Summary of findings 3. Porter 2020: armodafinil compared with placebo for fatigue in high‐grade glioma.

Armodafinil (150 mg and 250 mg) compared with placebo for fatigue
Patient or population: people with primary brain tumour
Settings: hospital, outpatient
Intervention: armodafinil (150 mg and 250 mg)
Comparison: placebo
Outcomes Group comparisons No. of participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Placebo Armodafinil 150 mg Armodafinil 250 mg
Fatigue Brief Fatigue Inventory (number of participants with an improvement in 2 points from baseline at 8 weeks (%)) 29 (29.9%) 27 (27.8%) 29 (28.2%) 297 (1) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa Higher scores indicate higher fatigue.
Cognition Symbol Digit Modalities Test (median (range)) 0.0 (–3.4 to 4.9) 0.0 (–1.6 to 2.5) 0.3 (–3.4 to 2.5) 180 (1) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa Higher scores indicate better performance.
Quality of life Linear Analogue Self Assessment (median (range)) 2.0 (–15.0 to 27.0 4.0 (–32.0 to 26.0) 3.0 (–16.0 to 27.0) 232 (1) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Adverse events Grade 3 or higher (number of participants (%)) 3 (2.8%) 6 (5.5%) 8 (7.3%) 328 (1) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowa
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate certainty: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low certainty: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low certainty: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

aDowngraded two levels; there was low‐certainty evidence due to the level of unclear risk of bias relating to selection, detection and attrition.