Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2022 May 12;73(16):5634–5649. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac204

The transcription factor TaMYB31 regulates the benzoxazinoid biosynthetic pathway in wheat

Zhaniya S Batyrshina 1, Reut Shavit 2, Beery Yaakov 3, Samuel Bocobza 4, Vered Tzin 5,
Editor: Robert Hancock6
PMCID: PMC9467655  PMID: 35554544

Abstract

Benzoxazinoids are specialized metabolites that are highly abundant in staple crops, such as maize and wheat. Although their biosynthesis has been studied for several decades, the regulatory mechanisms of the benzoxazinoid pathway remain unknown. Here, we report that the wheat transcription factor MYB31 functions as a regulator of benzoxazinoid biosynthesis genes. A transcriptomic analysis of tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum) tissue revealed the up-regulation of two TtMYB31 homoeologous genes upon aphid and caterpillar feeding. TaMYB31 gene silencing in the hexaploid wheat Triticum aestivum significantly reduced benzoxazinoid metabolite levels and led to susceptibility to herbivores. Thus, aphid progeny production, caterpillar body weight gain, and spider mite oviposition significantly increased in TaMYB31-silenced plants. A comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of hexaploid wheat revealed that the TaMYB31 gene is co-expressed with the target benzoxazinoid-encoded Bx genes under several biotic and environmental conditions. Therefore, we analyzed the effect of abiotic stresses on benzoxazinoid levels and discovered a strong accumulation of these compounds in the leaves. The results of a dual fluorescence assay indicated that TaMYB31 binds to the Bx1 and Bx4 gene promoters, thereby activating the transcription of genes involved in the benzoxazinoid pathway. Our finding is the first report of the transcriptional regulation mechanism of the benzoxazinoid pathway in wheat.

Keywords: Abiotic stress, biotic stress, herbivores, Rhopalosiphum padi aphid, specialized metabolites, Spodoptera littoralis caterpillar, Tetranychus urticae spider mite, Triticum aestivum, Triticum turgidum


A combined transcriptomic, metabolic, and dual expression analysis was used to discover the MYB transcription factor that regulates benzoxazinoid biosynthesis under biotic and abiotic stresses in wheat.

Introduction

In response to herbivore attacks, plants protect themselves with the production of a diverse array of specialized metabolites. These compounds function either as toxic deterrents to reduce insect feeding, repellents to limit herbivore visitations, or attractants to recruit natural enemies to locate their prey (Walling, 2000). The formation of specialized metabolites in response to stress is often regulated by the up-regulation of biosynthesis genes. Several transcription factors (TFs) are ­associated with the regulation of specialized metabolism, including members of the MYB, WRKY, and NAC families. MYB family members are involved in the biosynthesis of anthocyanin, phenylpropanoids, lignins, flavonoids, proanthocyanidins, phenolamides, and ethylene (Onkokesung et al., 2012; Cao et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2021).

Benzoxazinoids (BXDs) are indole-derived specialized metabolites. They are abundant in monocot plant species from the grass family, such as wheat, maize, and rye (Frey et al., 1997; Glawischnig et al., 1999; Nomura et al., 2002; Kokubo et al., 2017), and in several dicot families (Frey et al., 2009; Makowska et al., 2015). Their biosynthesis pathway has mostly been investigated in maize (Makowska et al., 2015; Niculaes et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2018). Naturally occurring BXDs are divided into three groups based on their N-substituents: lactams, methyl derivatives, and hydroxamic acids (Cambier et al., 2000). These metabolites represent the benzoxazinone class—basic metabolites of the biosynthesis pathway. Another BXD class is the benzoxazolinones—less toxic metabolites formed from benzoxazinones due to the loss of N-substituents (Wouters et al., 2016). The first committed step toward BXD biosynthesis starts with indole-3-glycerolphosphate synthase (IGPS), which synthesizes indole-3-glycerol phosphate (Richter et al., 2021). Indole-3-glycerol phosphate is then hydrolyzed by the indole-glycerol phosphate aldolase (Bx1), followed by four consecutive cytochrome P450 enzymes (Bx2–Bx5) and glucosyltransferases (Bx8/Bx9), resulting in the formation of DIBOA-Glc (2,4-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one-glucoside). Further hydroxylation and subsequent methylation are catalyzed by Bx6–Bx7 and Bx10–Bx14 (Frey et al., 1997; Rad et al., 2001; Niemeyer, 2009; Meihls et al., 2013; Handrick et al., 2016). The glycosylated form of BXDs is stored in the vacuole and deglycosylated by β-glucosidases on demand (Niculaes et al., 2018; Schütz et al., 2019) (Supplementary Fig. S1).

The BXD compounds perform various functions. They have been intensively studied concerning their protection against biotic stresses, including herbivorous aphids and caterpillars (Niemeyer, 2009; Wouters et al., 2016), mites (Bui et al., 2018), fungal pathogens (Oikawa et al., 2004; Søltoft et al., 2008; Ahmad et al., 2011), and root-associated microbiota (Hu et al., 2018; Cotton et al., 2019). BXDs also possess allelopathic properties in weed suppression (Quader et al., 2001; Wu et al., 2002). These compounds perform different roles beyond biotic stress protection, such as iron uptake (Tipton and Buell, 1970; Farkas et al., 1998; Pethô, 2002), aluminum tolerance (Poschenrieder et al., 2005), and possibly the regulation of flowering time (Romero Navarro et al., 2017). Moreover, BXDs are involved in the indirect regulation of plant growth and development (Oikawa et al., 2002; Kato-Noguchi, 2008) and stem elongation through interactions with plant hormones (Xu et al., 2021).

BXD levels in plants are altered in response to environmental cues. For example, drought stress has been reported to increase the levels of 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIMBOA) and 2,4-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIBOA) in maize leaves (Richardson and Bacon, 1993). In contrast, studies suggested that the O-methyltransferase, ZmBx12, which methylates DIMBOA-Glc into 2-hydroxy-4,7-dimethoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one glucoside (HDMBOA-Glc), plays a role in the adaptation of maize plants to drought conditions (Zhang et al., 2021b). A combination of drought and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide has reduced HDMBOA-Glc levels, resulting in susceptibility to a mycotoxigenic pathogen (Vaughan et al., 2016). In wheat seedlings, the BXD levels were only affected by temperature changes (15, 20, and 25 °C), which were suggested to be at least partially mediated through their effect on plant growth (Gianoli and Niemeyer, 1996, 1997). Rye plants have shown a reduction in BXD biosynthesis under prolonged low-temperature conditions in biochemical and gene expression assays (Stochmal and Kowalczyk, 2020). Taken together, this suggests that BXDs participate in biotic and abiotic stress responses, as well as developmental processes.

Although BXD metabolism has been studied for several decades, the transcriptional regulation of Bx genes has not yet been thoroughly investigated. Only a handful of reports indicate the potential TFs that might be involved in regulating this pathway in maize plants. The Mo17 and B73 inbred maize lines showed induction of the gene expression levels of four TF genes (ZmWRKY75, ZmMYB61, ZmNAC35, and ZmGRAS37) upon Rhopalosiphum padi aphid infestation, which was implicated in the up-regulation of the ZmBx1 and ZmBx13 genes and positively correlated with BXD abundance (Song et al., 2017). Another report suggested that ZmbHLH57 and ZmWRKY34 may regulate Bx genes in systemic leaves stimulated by the Mythimna separata oriental armyworm (Malook et al., 2019). An analysis of multiple gene regulatory networks in maize identified four TFs that have been suggested to regulate Bx genes, including TF families such as MYB (ZmMYB112), NAC (ZmNAC21), GRAS (dwarf plant 8), and G2-like (golden plant 2) (Zhou et al., 2020). However, these studies were performed using maize transcriptomic approaches without directly testing the function of the identified TFs. Thus far, only ZmbHLH20 and ZmbHLH76 (basic helix–loop–helix) were functionally determined as regulators of BXD biosynthesis using a protoplast transfection system (Gao et al., 2019). However, the function of TFs and their interaction with Bx genes in planta remain unexplored.

In this study, we investigated the transcriptional regulation of BXD biosynthesis-related genes in wheat. Our recent transcriptomic analysis of the tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) cv. Svevo wheat transcriptome revealed the up-regulation of Bx genes upon 6 h of Spodoptera littoralis caterpillar feeding (Shavit et al., 2022). We exploited this transcriptomic dataset to determine which TFs are overexpressed in response to herbivore attacks. Then, we evaluated the possible role played by the TaMYB31 TF using a Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV)-based virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) system and found that TaMYB31 is involved in the regulation of BXDs in wheat seedlings. Furthermore, TaMYB31-silenced wheat plants were more susceptible to herbivorous insects than the control plants. Following a previous study that reported that the TaMYB31 gene is involved in drought responses in wheat (Bi et al., 2016), we hypothesized that BXD levels would also be induced under drought conditions. Thus, we performed several abiotic stress experiments, including drought, polyethylene glycol (PEG), cold, and salt stresses, and discovered that BXD levels increased under these conditions. Lastly, we investigated the Bx binding selectivity of TaMYB31 by ectopic expression in BXD-deficient tobacco plants and identified the promoters of several Bx genes activated by this TF. This is the first report to suggest that TaMYB31 regulates the biosynthesis of BXDs and plays a role under both biotic and abiotic stresses.

Materials and methods

Plant material and growth conditions

Hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cultivar Chinese Spring) and tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) were used in this study. Seeds were germinated in plastic pots (330 cm3) containing a moistened tuff mixture with vermiculite (2:1) and an N–P–K fertilizer (20–20–20); they were then kept in a growth room and maintained under a controlled regime of 24–26 °C and 16/8 h of light/dark, and were watered as needed.

Extraction of DNA and RNA

The second leaf of 11-day-old wheat plants was harvested, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80 °C. The frozen leaf tissue was ground into a fine powder using a Retsch Mixer Mill MM 400 (ProfiLab24 GmbH, Germany) with pre-chilled holders and grinding beads, and was used for different analyses. A Plant Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Geneaid Biotech Ltd, Taiwan) was used for genomic DNA isolation. RNA was extracted using a Spectrum™ Plant Total RNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and treated with Dnase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific. Inc., USA). For quantitative reverse transcription–PCR (qRT–PCR), purified RNA was quantified and checked for integrity by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel and by a NanoDrop One-W UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Then, 1 µg of RNA, extracted from the wheat leaves, was used to synthesize cDNA using the qScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Quantabio, USA).

Virus-induced gene silencing cloning and assay

The cDNA from the hexaploid wheat Chinese Spring cultivar was used to amplify the coding sequence fragment of the TaMYB31 gene (GenBank accession KU674897; IWGSC gene IDs: TraesCS5A02G227400, TraesCS5B02G226100, and TraesCS5D02G234800). A fragment of 213 bp was cloned into the BSMV RNAi vector pCa-ybLIC via a ligation-independent cloning method, using ApaI restriction enzyme (Yuan et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2015), and transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. A fragment of the phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene was fused into the BSMV system and used as a positive control showing the photobleaching phenotype (Travella et al., 2006; Yuan et al., 2011; Feng et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2015). The final optical density of agrobacteria, carrying target genes, was brought to OD600=1.0 in an infiltration buffer containing 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES at pH 5.6, and 150 µM acetosyringone. Resuspended cells were incubated at room temperature for 3 h and mixed in a 1:1:1 ratio with BSMV RNAα- and RNAβ-carrying agrobacteria before infiltration, and then pressure-infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves. Five days post-agroinfiltration, virus-infected N. benthamiana leaves were homogenized (1:3 w:v) with 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7) containing 1–2% w/v Celite® 545 AW and the sap was inoculated into 5-day-old first wheat leaves. As a negative control of gene silencing, an empty BSMV vector (without any gene insert) was used. Finally, 14 days post-inoculation (dpi), the second leaves were harvested and used for several analyses, including metabolic measurements, gene expression analysis, and insect performance assays. The list of primers used for the cloning is presented in Supplementary Table S1.

Quantitative RT–PCR analysis

For the amplification of the TaMYB31 gene fragment, primers were designed using the Primer3Plus software (www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/primer3plus/primer3plus.cgi/). The specificity of the primers was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis and melting curve analysis. The efficiency of the primers (90–110%) was determined by a standard curve with a 3-fold serial dilution of cDNA. Two T. aestivum genes, Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPC) and Actin (ACT-1), were used as reference genes. Both genes were previously used for the normalization of expression of TaMYB31 in wheat and Arabidopsis plants under drought conditions (Bi et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2018) and for quantifying BSMV gene silencing efficiency in wheat (Zhai et al., 2017; Shavit et al., 2022). The cDNA of VIGS-inoculated plants was prepared as described above. Reactions were prepared in triplicate for each sample with Power SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems™, USA) and run on a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems™, USA). The PCR was initiated by incubation at 95 °C for 10 min, and amplification was performed in 40 cycles (95 °C for 30 s and 60 °C for 15 s). For each gene, four biological replicates were analyzed for TaMYB31-silenced plants and compared with the BSMV::empty vector. The list of primers used for the qRT–PCR is shown in Supplementary Table S1.

Network analysis

For the enrichment analysis of MYB31/Bx genes in wheat, Bx genes were manually curated from various studies (Nomura et al., 2005; Sue et al., 2011, 2021; Li et al., 2018; Richter et al., 2021) and by BLAST sequence alignment against annotated maize genes (Altschul et al., 1990). Next, a 1 kb segment of the genomic DNA sequence upstream of the transcription start site of each gene was extracted, and a prediction of TF binding was performed using the PlantRegMap binding site prediction tool (planttfdb.cbi.pku.edu.cn) against T. aestivum (threshold P-value ≤10−4). The Bx genes were selected by their predicted binding of TaMYB31 for further analysis (Supplementary Table S2). Next, wheat expression datasets (TPM values) were collected from the Earlham Institutes Grassroots data repository for T. aestivum genes RefSeq v1.1 (opendata.earlham.ac.uk/wheat); (Ramírez-González et al., 2018). Then, 18 out of the 35 datasets relevant to the current experimental design were selected. We prioritized expression data from wheat above-ground tissue, early stages of development, diseases such as pathogenic fungi and powdery mildew, and the following abiotic stress conditions: phosphorus starvation, drought, heat, and cold (Supplementary Table S3). Results from the scale-free topology (soft threshold) and subsequent weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) analysis for the 14 datasets were examined (Supplementary Table S4), including the total number of modules in the dataset (modules), the total number of genes in the dataset (total genes), the total number of unassigned genes (grey module genes), and the number of unassigned Bx genes (grey module Bx genes). These datasets were clustered using the WGCNA R package (v1.70-3) (Zhang and Horvath, 2005; Langfelder and Horvath, 2008), after which three sets were discarded due to unreliable results in the pickSoftThreshold function, and one set failed the TOMsimilarity/adjacency functions due to memory limitations. Of the remaining 14, only six sets had modules with enriched MYB31/Bx genes. Enrichment analysis of MYB31/Bx genes in each dataset was conducted by a Fisher’s exact test (Fisher, 1970; Benjamini and Yekutieli, 2001) in R (v4.1.0; R Core Team, 2021)

Benzoxazinoid extraction and analysis

BXDs were extracted from the upper part of the second leaves of VIGS-inoculated plants. Samples were extracted as previously described (Shavit et al., 2018). In brief, tissues were ground to a fine powder and mixed with an extraction solvent of 80% methanol and 0.1% formic acid in double-distilled water (DDW) in a 1:10 (w:v) ratio. Benzoxazolin-2(3H)-one (BOA; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added to the extraction buffer as an internal standard to a final concentration of 10 µg ml–1. Then, samples were briefly vortexed, sonicated in ice for 40 min, filtered with a 0.22 µm sterilizing membrane (EMD Millipore Corp., USA), and kept at 4 °C before analysis. Metabolite separation was conducted on a Dionex UltiMate 3000 HUPLC system using a C18 reverse-phase Hypersil GOLD column with 3 μm pore size, 150 × 4.60 mm (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany). The sample-running protocol followed instrumental conditions described previously (Batyrshina et al., 2020) with 5 µl per sample injection. Quantification was done on Chromeleon software (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) by confirming metabolites using UV spectra and standards (Shavit et al., 2022).

Abiotic stress conditions

For stimulating drought stress, Chinese Spring wheat seeds were sown on moistened soil and grown in 330 cm3 pots in growth room conditions. Plants were watered after 14 d, and tissues were harvested 2 d after the second watering. For the dehydration stress, sterilized seeds were grown on PEG-infused plates (Verslues et al., 2006) with –1.2 MPa final water potential. A half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium was used to grow control plants (Murashige and Skoog, 1962). The seed sterilization procedure included washing seeds in a 3% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 min, followed by rinsing three times with sterile water. To stimulate salt and low-temperature stresses, plants were grown in Petri dishes and shared the same control grown on DDW. Salt-treated plants were grown in a 150 mM NaCl solution, while low-temperature testing plates received DDW. For low-temperature treatments, 5-day-old seedlings were grown in favorable growth conditions and then transferred to 4 °C in a cold room for 2 d. Shoot tissues were harvested from each plant, with at least seven biological replicates per treatment, and kept at –80 °C prior to metabolic analyses.

Aphid, caterpillar, and mite bioassays

Pests were maintained in controlled growth room conditions under a 16 h light and 8 h dark photoperiod at 24–26 °C. All insect bioassays were tested on second leaves (only the first leaf was infected with VIGS plasmids) and applied on VIGS-inoculated plants at 10 dpi. Insect bioassays were performed on a BSMV::empty vector as a control treatment. The bird cherry-oat aphid (R. padi) colony was reared on 2- to 3-week-old bread wheat plants (T. aestivum cv. Rotem; Agridera Seeds & Agriculture Ltd, Israel). The aphid bioassay was conducted by confining 10 adult R. padi aphids inside a clip cage (4.5 cm in diameter) attached to the upper part of the second leaf. Aphid progeny production was counted after 96 h of infestation. The Egyptian cotton leafworm (S. littoralis) second and third instars were provided by Dr Rami Horowitz (ARO, Israel) and were fed for 2 d on 2-week-old Chinese Spring seedlings prior to the experiment. For the caterpillar bioassay, the second leaf of 15-day-old Chinese Spring plants (VIGS-inoculated plants at 10 dpi) was covered with a breathable cellophane bag in which S. littoralis larvae were applied. After 3 d, the caterpillar’s body weight was measured. Two-spotted spider mite (TSSM; Tetranychus urticae) eggs were obtained from Biobee Sde Eliyahu Ltd (Israel) and maintained on 4- to 5-week-old wheat plants (T. aestivum cv. Rotem). To remove the possible maternal effects of host plants, mites were acclimated to wheat plants at least three generations before the experiment. For the TSSM oviposition assay, a female was placed on the abaxial side of a wheat leaf segment (4 cm long) and kept on water-saturated cotton wool in a plastic container under growth room conditions, and eggs were counted after 3 d, under a binocular microscope (Weinblum et al., 2021). In total, 12 leaf segments were tested per treatment.

Dual expression system using transient expression in tobacco leaves

To test the candidate promoters, an ~1 kb sequence upstream of the start codon of the selected Bx genes was amplified by PCR from T. aestivum Chinese Spring genomic DNA, using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (PCRBIO Verifi™ Polymerase, PCR Biosystems Ltd, UK). The coding region of the TaMYB31 gene was fully synthesized by Genewiz (Gene Synthesis Services, South Plainfield, NJ, USA) using a codon-optimized sequence to eliminate the inner IIS restriction recognition sites (BsaI and BsmBI; Supplementary Fig. S2). To assess whether TaMYB31 enhances the expression of Bx-associated genes in planta, a dual expression system based on transient gene expression in tobacco (N. benthamiana) leaves was established. The Goldenbraid (GB) cloning system was used for contract building, and cassettes were built using a multipartite assembly (Sarrion-Perdigones et al., 2013). Plasmids were generated to include the putative promoter sequences of the Bx genes, combined with green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter module, TaMYB31 driven by the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter, and the red fluorescent protein (RFP) driven by the Arabidopsis Ubiquitin10 (AtUBQ10) promoter, which was used as an internal standard for normalization of the results. A plasmid used as a negative control to measure background promoter activity was similarly generated, except for the TaMYB31 gene, which was not included. As a positive control, TaKCS1 (3-ketoacyl CoA synthetase promoter, KU737579), which was previously reported to be a target gene for TaMYB31 under drought conditions (Bi et al., 2016), was also tested. The final vectors were transferred to A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 using the freeze–thaw transformation method (Hofgen and Willmitzer, 1988). For tobacco agroinfiltration, an overnight-grown culture was resuspended in infiltration buffer, as described previously in the VIGS assay, and incubated for 3 h. After inoculation, plants were maintained in a growth room until infiltrated leaves were collected at 4 dpi. The list of primers used for the cloning is given in Supplementary Table S1.

Protein extraction and fluorescence assay

Tobacco leaf tissues were harvested and ground with a mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen. Then, 100 mg of homogenized tissue powder was mixed with an extraction buffer containing 10 mM TES pH 7.4, 300 mM sucrose, and 1× protease inhibitor in a 1:4 ratio, and centrifuged for 10 min at 4 °C at 14 000 g. The supernatant was collected and centrifuged again for 25 min at 4 °C at 14 000 g. The recovered supernatant was used for the Bradford protein assay (Bradford, 1976). Accordingly, 1 μg of crude protein extract from each sample was used for fluorescent protein analysis, and fluorescence measurements were performed in the Tecan Infinite M200 microplate reader (Tecan, Switzerland). The test was set with the following parameters: for GFP intensity, the excitation wavelength was 488 nm, and the emission wavelength was 525 nm; and for RFP intensity, the excitation wavelength was 590 nm, and the emission wavelength was 635 nm, respectively. The assay was repeated three times with five biological replicates per construct.

Statistics

The Student’s t-test was used for paired comparisons of treatments with controls. All tests were performed in JMP software (SAS) and figures were designed using Microsoft Excel.

Results

Selecting candidate transcription factors modified in response to insect feeding

To understand the regulatory mechanism underlying BXD biosynthesis, we exploited the recently published transcriptome dataset of tetraploid wheat, where several Bx genes were up-regulated under insect attack (Shavit et al., 2022). This dataset identified TF candidates from the nine TF families (MYB, NAC, WRKY, bHLH, GRAS, bZIP, GLABROUS1, BTB/POZ, and heat shock factors), potentially regulating specialized metabolism. We identified 17 TFs that were up-regulated upon caterpillar feeding. Bzip9, TaMYB31, TaMYB29, TaNAC41, TaWRKY36, BTB/POZ/TAZ domain-containing protein-2, and HSF clone HD2967 were also induced upon aphid infestation, although the last two transcripts did not show significant changes. As shown in Table 1, mainly the subgenome B homeologs of the TF genes were induced under insect feeding.

Table 1.

Gene expression of transcription factors induced by herbivory

n Transcription factor name Svevo v1. Ensemble ID IWGSC Ensemble ID Aphids/control Caterpillars/control
log2FC P-value log2FC P-value
1 bHLH TRITD1Av1G205210 TraesCS1A02G362800 0.69 3.6E-01 7.26 9.1E-27
TRITD1Bv1G195110 TraesCS1B02G380000 –2.13 1.5E-01 4.77 1.1E-07
TraesCS1D02G367700
2 BTB/POZ and TAZ domain-containing protein 2 TRITD2Av1G206590 TraesCS2A02G323200 0.90 6.0E-01 8.42 3.1E-11
TRITD2Bv1G170350 TraesCS2B02G359400 1.28 2.6E-01 4.07 1.3E-04
3 bZIP (OBF1c) TRITD6Av1G059270 TraesCS6A02G154600 0.18 5.9E-01 0.21 5.3E-01
TRITD6Bv1G068030 TraesCS6B02G182500 0.30 4.8E-01 1.79 2.3E-05
TraesCS6D02G144400
4 bZIP9 TRITD7Av1G054450 TraesCS7A02G170600 0.89 4.2E-02 1.45 8.3E-04
TRITD7Bv1G030080 TraesCS7B02G075600 –0.36 6.5E-01 1.89 1.3E-02
TraesCS7D02G171300
5 GRAS putative TRITD4Av1G155270 TraesCS4A02G191300 0.07 8.5E-01 1.02 6.5E-03
TRITD4Bv1G051570 TraesCS4B02G124000 0.57 2.2E-01 0.65 1.6E-01
TraesCS4D02G122000
6 Hsf clone HD2967 TRITD7Av1G195490 TraesCS7A02G360400 –0.07 9.1E-01 2.75 4.5E-05
TRITD7Bv1G150310 TraesCS7B02G267300 1.26 2.1E-01 5.30 5.2E-08
7 HsfA4e TRITD2Av1G076140 TraesCS2A02G204500 –0.05 9.4E-01 3.20 6.9E-08
TRITD2Bv1G084940 TraesCS2B02G232000 –0.45 6.5E-01 5.27 6.0E-10
TraesCS2D02G211400
8 MYB31 TRITD5Av1G144700 TraesCS5A02G227400 –0.11 8.6E-01 1.51 1.2E-02
TRITD5Bv1G134610 TraesCS5B02G226100 1.09 1.3E-02 1.37 1.6E-03
TraesCS5D02G234800
9 NAC41 TRITD5Av1G170450 TraesCS5A02G291200 1.09 5.7E-05 1.61 1.8E-09
TRITD5Bv1G161590 TraesCS5B02G290200 1.11 5.0E-03 -0.24 5.5E-01
TraesCS5D02G298600
10 STOREKEEPER/GeBP TraesCS7A02G199000
TRITD7Bv1G043720 TraesCS7B02G105700 –0.06 9.1E-01 1.55 4.2E-03
TraesCS7D02G201700
11 WRKY clone8 TRITD1Av1G209580 TraesCS1A02G401800 –0.99 2.7E-01 2.42 1.6E-03
TRITD1Bv1G214620 –0.90 4.1E-01 2.51 6.8E-03
12 WRKY27 TRITD2Av1G202930 TraesCS2A02G330500 4.83 8.3E-04
TraesCS2B02G351600
TraesCS2D02G332300
13 WRKY28 TRITD3Av1G184990 TraesCS3A02G281900 5.03 3.3E-04
TRITD3Bv1G167040 TraesCS3B02G315600 0.43 6.3E-01 2.74 1.2E-03
TraesCS3D02G281900
14 WRKY36 TRITD3Av1G150670 TraesCS3A02G228600 –1.14 3.4E-01 4.58 1.0E-07
TRITD3Bv1G133450 TraesCS3B02G256000 2.84 8.4E-04 4.66 2.0E-08
TraesCS3D02G226300
15 WRKY64 TRITD1Av1G222800 TraesCS1A02G421900 0.35 5.5E-01 4.35 2.9E-17
TraesCS1B02G453200
TraesCS1D02G429800
16 WRKY68 TRITD2Av1G251140 TraesCS2A02G433000 –0.41 2.1E-01 1.19 3.6E-04
TRITD2Bv1G212960 TraesCS2B02G454300 0.24 5.4E-01 1.00 1.0E-02
TraesCS2D02G431000
17 MYB29 TRITD5Av1G185470 TraesCS5A02G329900 –0.36 4.3E-01 –0.06 8.9E-01
TRITD5Bv1G175020 TraesCS5B02G330100 1.94 2.1E-03 1.97 1.8E-03
TraesCS5D02G335700

Wheat seedlings (tetraploid durum wheat Svevo cultivar) were infested with R. padi and S. littoralis for 6 h. Shown are fold change values relative to the uninfested control in log2. P-values in bold represent P<0.05. The full description of the RNA-seq data and the experimental setup are presented in Shavit et al. (2022)

To analyze the interaction between TFs and Bx promoters, we performed in silico prediction using PlantRegMap. The following criteria were applied to select TF candidates: (i) TF family function analysis (Supplementary Table S5) and (ii) in silico prediction of interaction with Bx promoters. Most candidate TFs (Supplementary Table S6) did not show a possible interaction with Bx promoters, apart from TaMYB31, TaWRKY68, bZIP9, and TaMYB29 (Supplementary Table S7). Thus, with at least one binding site on each promoter, TaMYB31, TaMYB29, and TaWRKY68 were predicted to interact with the promoters of 25, 17, and 16 Bx genes, respectively, whereas the prediction for bZIP9 resulted in four homoeologous promoters located upstream of Bx5 and Bx6. In this study, we focus on TaMYB31 for further functional analysis using a transient silencing system.

Silencing the transcription factor gene TaMYB31 affected benzoxazinoid biosynthesis in wheat

To investigate whether the selected TF gene TaMYB31 is involved in BXD biosynthesis, we used the BSMV-based VIGS system (Lee et al., 2015). The effect of TaMYB31 gene silencing was confirmed by measuring the BXD levels in leaves. As a positive control of the VIGS system, a few plants were infected with BSMV::PDS, and a leaf photobleaching phenotype was detected (Supplementary Fig. S3). The silencing efficiency of the TaMYB31 gene was verified by qRT–PCR analysis relative to two reference genes GAPC and ACT-1. The results showed that the expression level of TaMYB31 was reduced by 46% in silenced plants compared with the BSMV::empty vector (Fig. 1A). As a result of this gene silencing, the levels of several BXD compounds, including DIMBOA-Glc, DIM2BOA-Glc, HDMBOA-Glc, and DIMBOA-3 Hex, were significantly decreased relative to the empty vector control (Fig. 1B). This metabolic analysis suggests that TaMYB31 is a potential regulator of the BXD pathway.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Effects of TaMYB31 gene silencing on benzoxazinoid content. RNA and metabolites were extracted from the second leaves of wheat plants at 14 dpi BSMV-VIGS containing the TaMYB31 gene. (A) Expression of TaMYB31 by qRT–PCR using two reference genes Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPC) and Actin (ACT-1) (n=4). (B) Left panel, BXD metabolite levels presented as mg g–1 FW. Right panel, BXD metabolite levels in peak area from chromatogram (n=10–11). The comparison was made using Student’s t-test relative to BSMV::empty vector, P<0.05. Asterisks indicate a significant difference. In this figure, a single independent biological experiment is presented.

TaMYB31 is involved in defense against insect herbivory

To evaluate whether TaMYB31 expression plays a role in biotic stresses, several bioassays of pest infestation from different feeding guilds were conducted, including (i) a phloem feeder, the bird cherry-oat aphid (R. padi), (ii) a leaf-chewing insect, the Egyptian cotton leafworm caterpillar (S. littoralis), and (iii) a cell content feeder, the two-spotted spider mite (TSSM; T. urticae). As shown in Fig. 2A, the expression level of TaMYB31 in the BSMV::TaMYB31 plants was reduced by 57%. As a result, these plants were more susceptible to all three types of pests than the BSMV::empty control plants (Fig. 2B). This emphasizes the vital role this TF plays in wheat defense mechanisms, which may result from BXD reduction. Thus, we measured the BXD levels of TaMYB31-silenced plants after herbivore feeding and compared them with the BSMV::empty vector. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S4, aphid feeding did not affect the BXD levels of either BSMV::empty or BSMV::TaMYB31 plants, while significant changes were detected upon caterpillar attack. The BXD compounds, DIMBOA-3 Hex, HBOA-2 Hex, and DIMBOA-Glc/DIMBOA were dramatically reduced in TaMYB31-silenced plants after caterpillar feeding. In contrast, only the reduction of DIMBOA-Glc/DIMBOA was observed in BSMV::empty plants, while HDMBOA-Glc was significantly increased. These results support previous studies that showed similar trends of BXD metabolites upon caterpillar feeding in maize and wheat plants (Tzin et al., 2015; Li et al., 2018).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Gene silencing of TaMYB31 affects insect herbivory susceptibility. Insect bioassay was performed on BSMV-VIGS-inoculated plants. (A) Expression of TaMYB31 by qRT–PCR using two reference genes Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPC) and Actin (ACT-1) (n=5). Data are presented as means from a single independent biological experiment ±SE. Asterisks indicate a significant difference, Student’s t-test P<0.05. (B) Aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi) progeny production after 4 d (n=5); caterpillar (Spodoptera littoralis) weight after 3 d (n=10); two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) oviposition after 3 d (n=12).

TaMYB31 protein activates Bx gene promoters

To evaluate the physical interaction of TaMYB31 and Bx gene promoters, we took advantage of a dual fluorescence expression system using transient expression in tobacco leaves. Six selected promoters of Bx-related genes were cloned and fused to the GFP reporter gene and assembled with the pro-AtUBQ10::RFP cassette. The resulting vectors were used as negative controls to determine the activity of promoters in the absence of an exogenous activator. Additionally, these cassettes were also fused to the pS35::TaMYB31 cassette into a final vector, and the GFP/RFP ratio was measured. As presented in Fig. 3, TaMYB31 activated the promoters of Bx1 ­(TraesCS7B02G294800) and Bx4b (TraesCS5B02G007100). No changes in fluorescence were obtained using the ­promoters of Bx3 (TraesCS5B02G007200), Bx4a ­(TraesCS5A02G008800), Bx8/9 (TraesCS7B02G016800), or IGPS3 (TraesCS7B02G423900). Overall, these results suggested that the TaMYB31 TF may activate some of the Bx promoters.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

TaMYB31 activates promoters of genes from the benzoxazinoid pathway. TaMYB31 protein and Bx gene promoter interactions were evaluated using a dual fluorescence system based on transient expression. Background promoter activity was assayed by infiltration of the same empty vector for each gene without a TaMYB31 cassette. Promoter sequences of the following genes were analyzed: IGPS3 (TraesCS7B02G423900), Bx1 (TraesCS7B02G294800), Bx3 (TraesCS5B02G007200), Bx4a (TraesCS5A02G008800), Bx4b (TraesCS5B02G007100), Bx8/9 (TraesCS7B02G016800), and TaKCS1 (KU737579). Shown are means of the GFP/RFP reporters ratio ±SE. Asterisks indicate a significant difference by Student’s t-test: *P<0.05; ***P<0.001 (n=5). In this figure, a single independent biological experiment is presented.

Benzoxazinoid biosynthesis is induced under abiotic stress conditions

We examined whether several abiotic stresses affected the BXD levels, by exposing wheat seedlings to drought, salt, and low-temperature conditions, and measured the metabolites in the shoots. On the basis of current knowledge about TaMYB31 (Bi et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2018), we hypothesized that BXD levels should also be induced under drought conditions. As shown in Fig. 4A, drought treatment caused elevations in DIMBOA-Glc, DIMBOA, HBOA-2 Hex, and HDMBOA-Glc/HM2BOA-Glc levels in wheat plants. To exclude the low water potentials that reduce water availability, we performed a dehydration stress experiment using PEG-infused agar plates. Thus, the plants that were grown on PEG-infused agar plates accumulated a significantly higher level of DIMBOA-Glc (Fig. 4B). DIBOA-Glc was not detected in plants grown on plates for the PEG treatment. Interestingly, the control plants grown in soil for the drought treatment did not accumulate DIMBOA, while this compound was present in the control plants of the PEG treatment, which might be a result of the interaction of the plant with the soil microbiota. To test whether salt stress affects BXD biosynthesis, seeds were sown in a 150 mM sodium chloride solution. The results presented in Fig. 4C demonstrate that salinity greatly induced BXD levels, specifically those of DIMBOA-Glc, DIMBOA-3 Hex, HBOA-2 Hex, and DIBOA-Glc. Notably, BXD levels were highly abundant under high salt conditions, which might be an indication of their role in adaptation to this condition. Compared with salt stress, a low-temperature treatment of 4 °C showed only induction of one BXD, DIMBOA-Glc (Fig. 4C). The results suggested that BXD metabolites are modified in response to environmental stress conditions. To test whether the accumulation of BXDs under abiotic stress conditions corresponds to levels of TaMYB31, we performed a gene expression analysis of wheat grown under drought and salt stress conditions. Under drought, TaMYB31 transcript levels were induced 2-fold (Supplementary Fig. S5A), while no changes were observed under salinity (Supplementary Fig. S5C). Moreover, we analyzed the expression of Bx1 and Bx4, two genes that were activated by TaMYB31 protein (Fig. 3), and found a significant gene induction under drought conditions of 1.5- and 3-fold, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S5B). These findings emphasize the involvement of TaMYB31 in the regulation of the BXD pathway under both biotic and abiotic stress conditions. However, the roles played by the different BXDs in abiotic stresses warrant further investigation.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Environmental stresses induce BXD levels in wheat leaves. (A) BXD profile of plants grown under drought conditions. (B) BXD profile of plants affected by polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment. (C) BXD levels of plants grown under either low temperature or salt stress conditions. Asterisks indicate a significant difference, P<0.05 by Student’s t-test (n=7–8). ND, not detected.

Enrichment analysis of TaMYB31 and Bx genes with a MYB-binding site

We next selected wheat expression data from publicly available sources to examine the co-expression of the TaMYB31 and BXD biosynthesis pathway genes. A soft thresholding power was determined for each dataset according to an analysis of scale-free topology for multiple soft thresholding powers (Zhang and Horvath, 2005). The Bx genes were divided into two groups: (i) Bx genes containing a TaMYB31 promoter-binding site (TaMYB31 target genes) and (ii) Bx genes that do not contain a TaMYB31 promoter-binding site (TaMYB31 non-target-genes). In total, 73 genes from the BXD pathway in wheat were used for prediction, 25 Bx genes in the TaMYB31 target gene group, and 48 in the TaMYB31 non-target gene group (Supplementary Table S8). Then, we identified enriched modules from six datasets associated with Bx genes using the WGCNA method. As presented in Table 2, the network analysis resulted from a higher number of clusters of Bx genes with TaMYB31 target genes than non-target genes (five versus three clusters, respectively). Notably, the number of enriched clusters was higher in the TaMYB31 target gene group, although it is represented by only 34.2% of the total Bx genes. Overall, four datasets showed enriched clusters of TaMYB31 target genes, including pathogens (one cluster from powdery mildew and two clusters from Fusarium pseudograminearum) and abiotic stresses (one cluster of cold and one cluster of drought and heat stresses). These results strengthen our finding that TaMYB31 is involved in BXD biosynthesis via the regulation of Bx gene expression.

Table 2.

A network analysis of Triticum aestivum RNA-seq data using publicly available wheat expression sources

Dataset Treatment Clusters Clusters TaMYB31/Bx genes Enriched clusters (TaMYB31 target genes) Enriched clusters (TaMYB31 non-target genes)
SRP041017 Powdery mildew 61 16 1 1
SRP043554 Cold 20 4 1 0
SRP045409 Drought and heat 49 17 1 0
SRP048912 Fusaruim pseudograminearum, 2 d 37 17 2 1
SRP068165 PEG 207 28 0 1
SRP078208 Fusaruim pseudograminearum, 3 d 402 27 0 0

TaMYB31 target genes were predicted in silico (PlantRegMap).

Discussion

BXDs have been a topic of growing interest for the last several decades due to their ecological potential in crop protection and pest management, as well as their abundance in cereal crops (Niculaes et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2018). However, there are many open questions regarding BXD function under various stress conditions, the transcriptional regulation of genes, and transport between organelles and tissues. Moreover, most of the knowledge related to this pathway was generated from maize, while there are many open questions regarding other plant species. Here, we combined a transcriptomic dataset, gene silencing, and metabolic analysis to identify the potential TFs that may regulate this pathway. The expression of the gene encoding TaMYB31, a R2R3-MYB family TF, showed that it is up-regulated upon both aphid and caterpillar feeding (Table 1). MYBs are a large family of TFs, highly abundant in plants. They are known to be involved in controlling various cell processes, from responses to biotic and abiotic stresses to plant development, cell differentiation, and metabolism, as well as defense (Ambawat et al., 2013). A large-scale in silico identification of the MYB family in wheat revealed 218 sequences out of 464 MYB contigs, and singlets were found to be potential MYB proteins, including 1R-MYB, R2R3-MYB, 3R-MYB, and 4R-MYB subfamilies (Cai et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012). Currently, full-length sequences of at least 73 TaMYB genes are known and reported to play a role in drought stress and phloem-based defense through the regulation of callose biosynthesis and ethylene signaling (Baloglu et al., 2014; Zhai et al., 2017), yet most of their functions have not been characterized. Our study showed that transient gene silencing of TaMYB31 reduced the BXD levels in a heterologous plant system, which was correlated with induction of pest susceptibility relative to the control (Figs 1, 2), and exposed possible interactions between the TaMYB31 protein and Bx gene promoters in plants (Fig. 3). Altogether, we discovered that TaMYB31 is a crucial regulator of BXD biosynthesis in wheat and might play a dual role under biotic and abiotic stresses.

The three subgenomes differentially contribute to BXD biosynthesis in hexaploid wheat, where Bx homologs in the B subgenome mainly contribute to the gene expression of this pathway (Nomura et al., 2005; Powell et al., 2017). This supports our transcriptomic analysis of the tetraploid wheat (T. turgidum ssp. durum) cv. Svevo, which found that MYB31, located on chromosome 5 of subgenome B, increased its expression upon aphid and caterpillar infestation (Table 1). Similarly, the expression analysis of TaMYB31 genes in the leaves, roots, and flowering spikes of the hexaploid wheat Chinese Spring showed a higher transcript level of subgenome B than other homoeologous genes (Zhao et al., 2018). We suggest that the TraesCS5B02G226100 gene in Chinese Spring hexaploid wheat and the TRITD5Bv1G134610 gene in durum wheat are the predominant MYB31 isoforms.

BXD compounds play a role in plant defense against pests. They are highly abundant in young wheat leaves when the plants are most vulnerable to herbivore damage and decline upon plant development when other defense strategies have evolved (Cambier et al., 2000; Kohler et al., 2015; Batyrshina et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2021). The susceptibility of maize recombinant inbred lines to R. maidis aphids was negatively correlated with DIMBOA-Glc levels (Meihls et al., 2013). The resistance of maize and wheat plants to aphids is affected by callose deposition, which is related to DIMBOA and DIMBOA-Glc abundance (Ahmad et al., 2011; Betsiashvili et al., 2015; Li et al., 2018). Moreover, DIMBOA and its breakdown product MBOA were shown to increase the levels of detoxification enzymes in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Feng et al., 1991, 1992), while DIMBOA in maize roots showed both feeding deterrence and toxicity effects on Western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera) larvae (Xie et al., 1990, 1992). Our results revealed that a reduction in TaMYB31 gene expression (Figs 1A, 2A) resulted in a reduction in BXD accumulation (Fig. 1B) and increased insect performance (Fig. 2B). These results agree with previous reports indicating that BXD levels, especially of DIMBOA-Glc and HDMBOA-Glc, determined insect herbivory performance (Oikawa et al., 2004; Ahmad et al., 2011; Glauser et al., 2011; Meihls et al., 2013; Mijares et al., 2013; Shavit et al., 2018). BXDs negatively impacted the productivity of generalist spider mites that fed on maize (Bui et al., 2018) and wheat plants (Shavit et al., 2022). Moreover, in response to mite infestation of maize plants, to either Oligonychus pratensis or TSSM, six Bx genes were induced (Bui et al., 2018), while some genes (Bx10–Bx12) shared quantitative trait locus intervals with TSSM resistance genes (Bui et al., 2021).

Increases in BXD antifeedant, antixenotic, antimicrobial, and allelopathic properties under biotic stresses are frequently reported (Niemeyer, 2009; Li et al., 2018), while the role they play under environmental changes is not. The TaMYB31 gene was previously reported to be highly expressed in wheat under drought growth conditions, involving cuticle formation (Bi et al., 2016). The ectopic expression of this gene in Arabidopsis plants revealed its involvement in drought resistance and wax biosynthesis regulation (Zhao et al., 2018). However, the role of BXDs under drought conditions is unknown. Our experiments confirmed that the transcript levels of TaMYB31 and Bx genes (Bx1 and Bx4) are highly induced under drought (Supplementary Fig. S5A, B), which in turn may cause an elevation in BXD levels (Fig. 4A). Although TaMYB31 activates promoters of genes from the early metabolic steps of the BXD pathway, the BXD compositions were slightly different between the VIGS assay and the drought. Interestingly, TaMYB31-silenced plants significantly lost downstream BXD compounds (Fig. 1), while early pathway intermediates were affected by drought stress (Fig. 4A). Nevertheless, DIMBOA-Glc, the main BXD compound in wheat leaves (Zhang et al., 2021a), was affected by both conditions. These differences might result from the developmental stage since the BXD pathway is dependent on plant age. Another possibile reason for the differences between the BXD profile of the VIGS assay and the drought is that additional TFs might be up-regulated under these conditions, which may target other Bx genes. However, this requires further investigation. We also used a PEG-supplemented medium to test the dehydration treatment effect, which was shown to be an up-regulation condition for the TaMYB31 gene level (Zhao et al., 2018). Our results revealed elevated levels of DIMBOA-Glc in the leaves (Fig. 4B), supporting the expression analysis conducted by Zhao et al., 2018. Similarly, transcriptome analysis of wheat leaves grown under PEG treatments for 2 h and 12 h showed up-regulation of TaMYB31 and Bx genes. Their expression is differentiated by wheat variety and exposure time to stress conditions (Supplementary Table S9). Based on the lack of knowledge on BXD changes under abiotic stress conditions, we additionally evaluated the influence of low temperature and salinity in wheat plant tissues (Fig. 4C). In both conditions, the DIMBOA-Glc levels were increased, while the salinity treatment also showed a significant accumulation of three other BXDs, suggesting that salinity has a strong induction effect on BXD biosynthesis. However, gene expression of TaMYB31 was not affected by salt stress (Supplementary Fig. S5C), suggesting an involvement of other TFs in this condition. Interestingly, cold stress highly induced TaMYB31 and Bx genes, including Bx3, Bx4, and Bx8/9 (Supplementary Table S9). Further investigation is required to provide new insights into the transcriptional regulation of genes and molecular mechanisms that caused changes under these environmental conditions. TFs control the entire life cycle of plants, from germination to seed development and from response to environmental cues and leaf senescence to programmed cell death (Agarwal et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2018; Cubría-Radío and Nowack, 2019; Li et al., 2019; Crawford et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020). The biosynthesis of specialized metabolite pathways is also regulated by specific TFs (Yang et al., 2012; Barco and Clay, 2020). As shown in Fig. 4C, salt stress resulted in the elevation of BXD levels that did not show the involvement of TaMYB31. This indicated the involvement of other TFs in the regulation of the BXD pathway under salt stress. TF families such as WRKY, MYB, NAC, and bZIP have been reported to be involved in crop plants’ responses to salt stress. For example, wheat transcription factor genes TaWRKY93 (Qin et al., 2015) and TaWRKY10 (Wang et al., 2013) confer tolerance to salt stress in Arabidopsis and transgenic tobacco, respectively. The TFs TaMYB73 (He et al., 2012) and TaNAC47 (Zhang et al., 2016) were induced by NaCl in wheat seedlings, while ectopic expression in Arabidopsis improved salinity tolerance. Similarly, TabZIP14-B was up-regulated by several stress treatments, including salinity, and Arabidopsis plants overexpressing TabZIP14-B showed enhanced tolerance to salt stress (Zhang et al., 2017). Another TF from the bZIP family, TabZIP15, is involved in improving salt tolerance in transgenic wheat lines, increasing above- and below-ground tissue fresh weight, height, and length, as well as decreasing oxidative stress contents (Bi et al., 2021). Thus, the regulation of BXD biosynthesis under salt stress requires further investigation.

Biological processes in plant cells are regulated by sequence-specific TFs that function by binding transcriptional regulatory regions, such as promoters, enhancers, and terminators. Studies that have investigated this interaction exploit bioinformatic tools (Frith et al., 2001, 2003; Bailey and Noble, 2003; Beckstette et al., 2006; Turatsinze et al., 2008; Grant et al., 2011) for de novo motif discovery. The domain structure and activation properties of TaMYB31 were previously investigated (Bi et al., 2016). Here, we used the Plant Transcription Factor database (Jin et al., 2015, 2017; Tian et al., 2020) to identify TaMYB31-binding sites in the 1 kb upstream of the start codon region of Bx genes. Then, we performed a network analysis that showed the co-expression of predicted target Bx genes with TaMYB31 under environmental stress conditions such as cold, drought, and heat (Table 2), as well as biotic stress inducers such as fungal pathogens (Table 2). Furthermore, a multivariant analysis of the MYB31, Bx, and IGPS gene expression levels, generated from the transcriptomic dataset of Svevo seedlings subjected to 6 h of either R. padi aphid or S. littoralis caterpillar feeding, supported these findings (Shavit et al., 2022). The heatmap presented in Supplementary Fig. S6 showed that both MYB31 homologs are co-expressed, with 36 genes associated with this pathway.

Several methods are commonly used for the functional analysis of protein–DNA binding sites, such as yeast-one hybrid or dual-luciferase assays (Li and Herskowitz, 1993; Wang and Reed, 1993; Hellens et al., 2005; Reece-Hoyes and Walhout, 2012). Here, we used a dual fluorescence analysis for the in planta evaluation of Bx promoter activation by TaMYB31. We tested six predicted/tested Bx promoters and found that TaBx1 and TaBx4 showed significant activation by TaMYB31. Furthermore, we selected a DNA fragment of a TaKCS1 cuticle-related gene promoter with three possible binding sites for TaMYB31 (Supplementary Table S10). As shown in Fig. 3, the predicted part of the TaKCS1 promoter confirmed regulation by TaMYB31, which emphasizes the accuracy of the dual fluorescence system. Previous studies have shown that TF target genes are not always sequential in the biosynthetic steps. For example, co-expression-based gene regulatory networks suggested four TFs that may regulate Bx genes, where each TF was linked to several Bx genes (not in a sequential manner) and varied between networks (Zhou et al., 2020). The TF genes ZmbLHL57 and ZmWRKY34 are suggested to regulate Bx genes in systemic leaves under M. separata caterpillar feeding, where ZmbLHL57 was co-expressed with Bx2 and ZmWRKY34 with Bx6 and Bx10–11, respectively (Malook et al., 2019). Overall, our findings indicated that at least two metabolic steps of the BXD pathway, catalyzed by TaBx1 and TaBx4, are activated by the TaMYB31.

Conclusions

This is the first report to identify a TF regulating BXD biosynthesis in wheat and to characterize its role in planta. In addition, we observed that BXDs are involved in numerous biotic and abiotic stresses, while their role under salinity and cold stress requires further investigation. The next step for better understanding BXD functions and TaMYB31 regulation is to generate stable knockout mutants and test their BXDs and resistances under various and combined stress conditions and growth stages.

Supplementary data

The following supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Table S1. The oligonucleotide sequences that were used in this study.

Table S2. The in silico prediction results of Bx genes for the presence of TaMYB31-binding sites.

Table S3. Wheat expression database information used for network analysis.

Table S4. Scale-free topology and WGCNA results of selected datasets.

Table S5. An overview of TF family functions in plants.

Table S6. Candidate TF IDs.

Table S7. TF-binding site positions on Bx promoters.

Table S8. List of selected Bx genes and whether they contain TaMYB31-binding sites on the promoters.

Table S9. Expression of TaMYB31 and Bx genes under abiotic stress conditions.

Table S10. Predicted binding sites of the TaKCS1 promoter for TaMYB31 regulation.

Fig. S1. Scheme of the benzoxazinoid (BXD) biosynthetic pathway.

Fig. S2. The TaMYB31 coding region sequence was optimized to eliminate the cleavage sites of inner IIS restriction (BsaI and BsmBI).

Fig. S3. Photobleaching phenotype of BSMV::PDS.

Fig. S4. Herbivore-induced BXD levels of TaMYB31-silenced plants relative to the BSMV::empty vector plants.

Fig. S5. Gene expression levels of TaMYB31 and Bx genes under abiotic stress conditions.

Fig. S6. Heatmap of the multivariant analysis of the transcriptomic data of TtBx and TtMYB31.

erac204_suppl_supplementary_figures_S1-S6
erac204_suppl_supplementary_tables_S1-S10

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Kostya Kanyuka (Rothamsted Research and NIAB, UK) for providing the BSMV-VIGS system; Diego Orzaez (Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Spain) for providing the GoldenBraid cloning vector collection; Nati Weinblum (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev) for helping with the TSSM mite bioassay; Biobee Sde Eliyahu Ltd. for providing the TSSMs; Rami Horowitz (Agriculture Research Organization) for providing the Spodoptera caterpillars; Assaf Distelfeld (University of Haifa) for providing the wheat seeds; Gad Miller (Bar-Ilan University) for assisting with the experimental design; Inna Khozin-Goldberg (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev) for assisting with the manuscript; and Matthias Erb (University of Bern, Switzerland) for sharing crude extract and standards. We also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their critical comments that helped us to improve this manuscript.

Contributor Information

Zhaniya S Batyrshina, French Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Drylands, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben Gurion, 8499000, Israel.

Reut Shavit, French Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Drylands, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben Gurion, 8499000, Israel.

Beery Yaakov, French Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Drylands, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben Gurion, 8499000, Israel.

Samuel Bocobza, Department of Ornamentals and Biotechnology, Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, 68 Hamakabim Road, 7528809, Rishon LeZion, Israel.

Vered Tzin, French Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Drylands, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben Gurion, 8499000, Israel.

Robert Hancock, The James Hutton Institute, UK.

Author contributions

ZB, RS, and VT: study design; ZB: performing all the experiments and data analyses; BY: conducting the network analysis; SB: design of the dual expression system; ZB and VT: writing—draft; RS, BY, and SB: editing the manuscript before submission.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research was supported by the Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund (IS-5092-18R) and partially funded by German Research Foundation Middle East Collaboration (KO 4781/4-1). RS was awarded a scholarship from the Israel Ministry of Science and Technology, and VT is the Sonnenfeldt-Goldman Career Development Chair for Desert Research.

Data availability

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article and its supplementary data published online

References

  1. Agarwal P, Kapoor S, Tyagi AK.. 2011. Transcription factors regulating the progression of monocot and dicot seed development. BioEssays 33, 189–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmad S, Veyrat N, Gordon-Weeks R, et al. 2011. Benzoxazinoid metabolites regulate innate immunity against aphids and fungi in maize. Plant Physiology 157, 317–327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ.. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215, 403–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ambawat S, Sharma P, Yadav NR, Yadav RC.. 2013. MYB transcription factor genes as regulators for plant responses: an overview. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 19, 307–321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bailey TL, Noble WS.. 2003. Searching for statistically significant regulatory modules. Bioinformatics 19, ii16–ii25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baloglu MC, Inal B, Kavas M, Unver T.. 2014. Diverse expression pattern of wheat transcription factors against abiotic stresses in wheat species. Gene 550, 117–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barco B, Clay NK.. 2020. Hierarchical and dynamic regulation of defense-responsive specialized metabolism by WRKY and MYB transcription factors. Frontiers in Plant Science 10, 1775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Batyrshina Z, Yaakov B, Shavit R, Singh A, Tzin V.. 2020. Comparative transcriptomic and metabolic analysis of wild and domesticated wheat genotypes reveals differences in chemical and physical defense responses against aphids. BMC Plant Biology 20, 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beckstette M, Homann R, Giegerich R, Kurtz S.. 2006. Fast index based algorithms and software for matching position specific scoring matrices. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D.. 2001. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics 29, 1165–1188. [Google Scholar]
  11. Betsiashvili M, Ahern KR, Jander G.. 2015. Additive effects of two quantitative trait loci that confer Rhopalosiphum maidis (corn leaf aphid) resistance in maize inbred line Mo17. Journal of Experimental Botany 66, 571–578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bi H, Luang S, Li Y, Bazanova N, Morran S, Song Z, Perera MA, Hrmova M, Borisjuk N, Lopato S.. 2016. Identification and characterization of wheat drought-responsive MYB transcription factors involved in the regulation of cuticle biosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 67, 5363–5380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bi C, Yu Y, Dong C, Yang Y, Zhai Y, Du F, Xia C, Ni Z, Kong X, Zhang L.. 2021. The bZIP transcription factor TabZIP15 improves salt stress tolerance in wheat. Plant Biotechnology Journal 19, 209–211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72, 248–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bui H, Greenhalgh R, Gill GS, Ji M, Kurlovs AH, Ronnow C, Lee S, Ramirez RA, Clark RM.. 2021. Maize inbred line B96 is the source of large-effect loci for resistance to generalist but not specialist spider mites. Frontiers in Plant Science 12, 693088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bui H, Greenhalgh R, Ruckert A, Gill GS, Lee S, Ramirez RA, Clark RM.. 2018. Generalist and specialist mite herbivores induce similar defense responses in maize and barley but differ in susceptibility to benzoxazinoids. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cai H, Tian S, Dong H.. 2012. Large scale in silico identification of MYB family genes from wheat expressed sequence tags. Molecular Biotechnology 52, 184–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cambier V, Hance T, de Hoffmann E.. 2000. Variation of DIMBOA and related compounds content in relation to the age and plant organ in maize. Phytochemistry 53, 223–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cao Y, Li K, Li Y, Zhao X, Wang L.. 2020. MYB transcription factors as regulators of secondary metabolism in plants. Biology 9, 61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cotton TEA, Pétriacq P, Cameron DD, Meselmani MA, Schwarzenbacher R, Rolfe SA, Ton J.. 2019. Metabolic regulation of the maize rhizobiome by benzoxazinoids. The ISME Journal 13, 1647–1658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Crawford T, Karamat F, Lehotai N, Rentoft M, Blomberg J, Strand Å, Björklund S.. 2020. Specific functions for Mediator complex subunits from different modules in the transcriptional response of Arabidopsis thaliana to abiotic stress. Scientific Reports 10, 5073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cubría-Radío M, Nowack MK.. 2019. Transcriptional networks orchestrating programmed cell death during plant development. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 131, 161–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Farkas E, Kozma E, Petho M, Herlihy KM, Micera G.. 1998. Equilibrium studies on copper(II)- and iron(III)-monohydroxamates. Polyhedron 17, 3331–3342. [Google Scholar]
  24. Feng R, Houseman J, Downe A.. 1991. Effect of ingested meridic diet and corn leaves on midgut detoxification processes in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 42, 203–210. [Google Scholar]
  25. Feng R, Houseman JG, Downe AER, Atkinson J, Arnason JT.. 1992. Effects of 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIMBOA) and 6-methoxybenzoxazolinone (MBOA) on the detoxification processes in the larval midgut of the European corn borer. Pest Biochemistry and Physiology 44, 147–154. [Google Scholar]
  26. Feng Y, Wang K, Ma C, Zhao Y, Yin J.. 2015. Virus-induced gene silencing-based functional verification of six genes associated with vernalization in wheat. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 458, 928–933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fisher R. 1970. Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. [Google Scholar]
  28. Frey M, Chomet P, Glawischnig E, et al. 1997. Analysis of a chemical plant defense mechanism in grasses. Science 277, 696–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Frey M, Schullehner K, Dick R, Fiesselmann A, Gierl A.. 2009. Benzoxazinoid biosynthesis, a model for evolution of secondary metabolic pathways in plants. Phytochemistry 70, 1645–1651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Frith M, Hansen U, Weng Z.. 2001. Detection of cis-element clusters in higher eukaryotic DNA. Bioinformatics 17, 878–889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Frith M, Li M, Weng Z.. 2003. Cluster-Buster: finding dense clusters of motifs in DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 31, 3666–3668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gao L, Shen G, Zhang L, Qi J, Zhang C, Ma C, Li J, Wang L, Malook SU, Wu J.. 2019. An efficient system composed of maize protoplast transfection and HPLC–MS for studying the biosynthesis and regulation of maize benzoxazinoids. Plant Methods 15, 144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gianoli E, Niemeyer HM.. 1996. Environmental effects on the induction of wheat chemical defences by aphid infestation. Oecologia 107, 549–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gianoli E, Niemeyer HM.. 1997. Environmental effects on the accumulation of hydroxamic acids in wheat seedlings: the importance of plant growth rate. Journal of Chemical Ecology 23, 543–551. [Google Scholar]
  35. Glauser G, Marti G, Villard N, Doyen GA, Wolfender JL, Turlings TCJ, Erb M.. 2011. Induction and detoxification of maize 1,4-benzoxazin-3-ones by insect herbivores. The Plant Journal 68, 901–911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Glawischnig E, Grun S, Frey M, Gierl A.. 1999. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases of DIBOA biosynthesis: specificity and conservation among grasses. Phytochemistry 50, 925–930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Grant CE, Bailey TL, Noble WS.. 2011. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27, 1017–1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Handrick V, Robert CAM, Ahern KR, et al. 2016. Biosynthesis of 8-O-methylated benzoxazinoid defense compounds in maize. The Plant Cell 28, 1682–1700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. He Y, Li W, Lv J, Jia Y, Wang M, Xia G.. 2012. Ectopic expression of a wheat MYB transcription factor gene, TaMYB73, improves salinity stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 1511–1522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hellens RP, Allan AC, Friel EN, Bolitho K, Grafton K, Templeton MD, Karunairetnam S, Gleave AP, Laing W.. 2005. Transient expression vectors for functional genomics, quantification of promoter activity and RNA silencing in plants. Plant Methods 1, 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hofgen R, Willmitzer L.. 1988. Storage of competent cells for Agrobacterium transformation. Nucleic Acid Research 16, 9877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hu L, Robert CAM, Cadot S, et al. 2018. Root exudate metabolites drive plant–soil feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the rhizosphere microbiota. Nature Communications 9, 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jin J, He K, Tang X, Li Z, Lv L, Zhao Y, Luo J, Gao G.. 2015. An Arabidopsis transcriptional regulatory map reveals distinct functional and evolutionary features of novel transcription factors. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32, 1767–1773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jin J, Tian F, Yang DC, Meng YQ, Kong L, Luo J, Gao G.. 2017. PlantTFDB 4.0: toward a central hub for transcription factors and regulatory interactions in plants. Nucleic Acids Research 45, D1040–D1045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kato-Noguchi H. 2008. Effects of four benzoxazinoids on gibberellin-induced alpha-amylase activity in barley seeds. Journal of Plant Physiology 165, 1889–1894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kim J, Kim JH, Lyu JI, Woo HR, Lim PO.. 2018. New insights into the regulation of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany 69, 787–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kohler A, Maag D, Veyrat N, Glauser G, Wolfender J, Turlings T, Erb M.. 2015. Within-plant distribution of 1,4-benzoxazin-3-ones contributes to herbivore niche differentiation in maize. Plant, Cell & Environment 38, 1081–1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kokubo Y, Nishizaka M, Ube N, Yabuta Y, Tebayashi SI, Ueno K, Taketa S, Ishihara A.. 2017. Distribution of the tryptophan pathway-derived defensive secondary metabolites gramine and benzoxazinones in Poaceae. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 81, 431–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Langfelder P, Horvath S.. 2008. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lee W-S, Rudd JJ, Kanyuka K.. 2015. Virus induced gene silencing (VIGS) for functional analysis of wheat genes involved in Zymoseptoria tritici susceptibility and resistance. Fungal Genetics and Biology 79, 84–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Li B, Förster C, Robert CAM, et al. 2018. Convergent evolution of a metabolic switch between aphid and caterpillar resistance in cereals. Science Advances 4, eaat6797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Li J, Han G, Sun C, Sui N.. 2019. Research advances of MYB transcription factors in plant stress resistance and breeding. Plant Signaling & Behavior 14, 1613131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Li J, Herskowitz I.. 1993. Isolation of ORC6, a component of the yeast origin recognition complex by a one-hybrid system. Science 262, 1870–1874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ma W, Xu L, Gao S, Lyu X, Cao X, Yao Y.. 2021. Melatonin alters the secondary metabolite profile of grape berry skin by promoting VvMYB14 -mediated ethylene biosynthesis. Horticulture Research 8, 43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Makowska B, Bakera B, Rakoczy-Trojanowska M.. 2015. The genetic background of benzoxazinoid biosynthesis in cereals. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 37, 176. [Google Scholar]
  56. Malook S, Qi J, Hettenhausen C, Xu Y, Zhang C, Zhang J, Lu C, Li J, Wang L, Wu J.. 2019. The oriental armyworm (Mythimna separata) feeding induces systemic defence responses within and between maize leaves. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: BiologicalSciences 374, 20180307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Meihls LN, Handrick V, Glauser G, et al. 2013. Natural variation in maize aphid resistance is associated with 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one glucoside methyltransferase activity. The Plant Cell 25, 23411–22355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Mijares V, Meihls LN, Jander G, Tzin V.. 2013. Near-isogenic lines for measuring phenotypic effects of DIMBOA-Glc methyltransferase activity in maize. Plant Signaling & Behavior 8, e26779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Murashige T, Skoog F.. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar]
  60. Niculaes C, Abramov A, Hannemann L, Frey M.. 2018. Plant protection by benzoxazinoids—recent insights into biosynthesis and function. Agronomy 8, 143. [Google Scholar]
  61. Niemeyer H. 2009. Hydroxamic acids derived from 2-hydroxy-2H-1,4-benzoxazin-3(4H)-one: key defense chemicals of cereals. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57, 1677–1696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Nomura T, Ishihara A, Imaishi H, Endo TR, Ohkawa H, Iwamura H.. 2002. Molecular characterization and chromosomal localization of cytochrome P450 genes involved in the biosynthesis of cyclic hydroxamic acids in hexaploid wheat. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 267, 210–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Nomura T, Ishihara A, Yanagita RC, Endo TR, Iwamura H.. 2005. Three genomes differentially contribute to the biosynthesis of benzoxazinones in hexaploid wheat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102, 16490–16495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Oikawa A, Ishihara A, Iwamura H.. 2002. Induction of HDMBOA-Glc accumulation and DIMBOA-Glc 4-O-methyltransferase by jasmonic acid in poaceous plants. Phytochemistry 61, 331–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Oikawa A, Ishihara A, Tanaka C, Mori N, Tsuda M, Iwamura H.. 2004. Accumulation of HDMBOA-Glc is induced by biotic stresses prior to the release of MBOA in maize leaves. Phytochemistry 65, 2995–3001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Onkokesung N, Gaquerel E, Kotkar H, Kaur H, Baldwin IT, Galis I.. 2012. MYB8 controls inducible phenolamide levels by activating three novel hydroxycinnamoyl-coenzyme A:polyamine transferases in Nicotiana attenuata. Plant Physiology 158, 389–407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Pethô M. 2002. Physiological role of the cyclic hydroxamic acids. Acta Biologica Szegediensis 46, 175–176. [Google Scholar]
  68. Poschenrieder C, Tolra RP, Barceló J.. 2005. A role for cyclic hydroxamates in aluminium resistance in maize. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 99, 1830–1836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Powell JJ, Fitzgerald TL, Stiller J, Berkman PJ, Gardiner DM, Manners JM, Henry RJ, Kazan K.. 2017. The defence-associated transcriptome of hexaploid wheat displays homoeolog expression and induction bias. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15, 533–543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Qin Y, Tian Y, Liu X.. 2015. A wheat salinity-induced WRKY transcription factor TaWRKY93 confers multiple abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 464, 428–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Quader M, Daggard G, Barrow R, Walker S, Sutherland MW.. 2001. Allelopathy, DIMBOA production and genetic variability in accessions of Triticum speltoides. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27, 747–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Rad UV, Hu R, Lottspeich F, Gierl A, Frey M.. 2001. Two glucosyltransferases are involved in detoxification of benzoxazinoids in maize. Science 28, 633–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Ramírez-González RH, Borrill P, Lang D, et al. 2018. The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat. Science 361, eaar6089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. R Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  75. Reece-Hoyes JS, Walhout AJM.. 2012. Gene-centered yeast one-hybrid assays. Methods in Molecular Biology 812, 189–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Richardson MD, Bacon CW.. 1993. Cyclic hydroxamic acid accumulation in corn seedlings exposed to reduced water potentials before, during, and after germination. Journal of Chemical Ecology 19, 1613–1624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Richter A, Powell AF, Mirzaei M, Wang LJ, Movahed N, Miller JK, Piñeros MA, Jander G.. 2021. Indole-3-glycerolphosphate synthase, a branchpoint for the biosynthesis of tryptophan, indole, and benzoxazinoids in maize. The Plant Journal 106, 245–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Romero Navarro JA, Willcox M, Burgueño J, et al. 2017. A study of allelic diversity underlying flowering-time adaptation in maize landraces. Nature Genetics 49, 476–480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Sarrion-Perdigones A, Vazquez-Vilar M, Palací J, Castelijns B, Forment J, Ziarsolo P, Blanca J, Granell A, Orzaez D.. 2013. Goldenbraid 2.0: a comprehensive DNA assembly framework for plant synthetic biology. Plant Physiology 162, 1618–1631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Schütz V, Bigler L, Girel S, Laschke L, Sicker D, Schulz M.. 2019. Conversions of benzoxazinoids and downstream metabolites by soil microorganisms. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7, 238. [Google Scholar]
  81. Shavit R, Batyrshina ZS, Dotan N, Tzin V.. 2018. Cereal aphids differently affect benzoxazinoid levels in durum wheat. PLoS One 13, e0208103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Shavit R, Batyrshina ZS, Yaakov B, Florean M, Köllner TG, Tzin V.. 2022. The wheat dioxygenase BX6 is involved in the formation of benzoxazinoids in planta and contributes to plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Science 316, 111171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Singh A, Dilkes B, Sela H, Tzin V.. 2021. The effectiveness of physical and chemical defense responses of wild emmer wheat against aphids depends on leaf position and genotype. Frontiers in Plant Science 12, 1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Søltoft M, Jørgensen LN, Svensmark B, Fornsgaard IS.. 2008. Benzoxazinoid concentrations show correlation with Fusarium Head Blight resistance in Danish wheat varieties. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 36, 245. [Google Scholar]
  85. Song J, Liu H, Zhuang H, Zhao C, Xu Y, Wu S, Qi J, Li J, Hettenhausen C, Wu J.. 2017. Transcriptomics and alternative splicing analyses reveal large differences between maize lines B73 and Mo17 in response to aphid Rhopalosiphum padi infestation. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 1738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Stochmal A, Kowalczyk M.. 2020. Benzoxazinoids biosynthesis in rye (Secale cereale L.) is affected by low temperature. Agronomy 10, 1260. [Google Scholar]
  87. Sue M, Fujii M, Fujimaki T.. 2021. Increased benzoxazinoid (Bx) levels in wheat seedlings via jasmonic acid treatment and etiolation and their effects on Bx genes including Bx6. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports 27, 101059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Sue M, Nakamura C, Nomura T.. 2011. Dispersed benzoxazinone gene cluster: molecular characterization and chromosomal localization of glucosyltransferase and glucosidase genes in wheat and rye. Plant Physiology 157, 985–997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Tian F, Yang D-C, Meng Y-Q, Jin J, Gao G.. 2020. PlantRegMap: charting functional regulatory maps in plants. Nucleic Acids Research 48, D1104–D1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Tipton CL, Buell EL.. 1970. Ferric iron complexes of hydroxamic acids from maize. Phytochemistry 9, 1215–1217. [Google Scholar]
  91. Travella S, Klimm T, Keller B.. 2006. RNA interference-based gene silencing as an efficient tool for functional genomics in hexaploid bread wheat. Plant Physiology 142, 6–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Turatsinze J, Thomas-Chollier M, Defrance M, van Helden J.. 2008. Using RSAT to scan genome sequences for transcription factor binding sites and cis-regulatory modules. Nature Protocols 3, 1578–1588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Tzin V, Lindsay PL, Christensen SA, Meihls LN, Blue LB, Jander G.. 2015. Genetic mapping shows intraspecific variation and transgressive segregation for caterpillar-induced aphid resistance in maize. Molecular Ecology 24, 5739–5750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Vaughan MM, Huffaker A, Schmelz EA, Dafoe NJ, Christensen SA, McAuslane HJ, Alborn HT, Allen LH, Teal PEA.. 2016. Interactive effects of elevated [CO2] and drought on the maize phytochemical defense response against mycotoxigenic Fusarium verticillioides. PLoS One 11, e0159270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu J, Zhu JK.. 2006. Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. The Plant Journal 45, 523–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Walling LL. 2000. The myriad plant responses to herbivores. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 19, 195–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Wang C, Deng P, Chen L, et al. 2013. A wheat WRKY transcription factor TaWRKY10 confers tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in transgenic tobacco. PLoS One 8, e6512065120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Wang M, Reed R.. 1993. Molecular cloning of the olfactory neuronal transcription factor Olf-1 by genetic selection in yeast. Nature 364, 121–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Weinblum N, Cna’ani A, Yaakov B, Sadeh A, Avraham L, Opatovsky I, Tzin V.. 2021. Tomato cultivars resistant or susceptible to spider mites differ in their biosynthesis and metabolic profile of the monoterpenoid pathway. Frontiers in Plant Science 12, 128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Wouters FC, Blanchette B, Gershenzon J, Vassão DG.. 2016. Plant defense and herbivore counter-defense: benzoxazinoids and insect herbivores. Phytochemistry Reviews 15, 1127–1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wu HW, Haig T, Pratley J, Lemerle D, An M.. 2002. Biochemical basis for wheat seedling allelopathy on the suppression of annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50, 4567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Xie YS, Arnason JT, Philogène BJR, Atkinson J, Morand P.. 1992. Behavioral responses of western corn rootworm larvae to naturally occurring and synthetic hydroxamic acids. Journal of Chemical Ecology 18, 945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Xie YS, Arnason JT, Philogène BJR, Lambert JDH, Atkinson J, Morand P.. 1990. Role of 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIMBOA) in the resistance of maize to western corn rootworm Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (Leconte) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Canadian Entomologist 122, 1177–1186. [Google Scholar]
  104. Xu D, Xie Y, Guo H, Zeng W, Xiong H, Zhao L, Gu J, Zhao S, Ding Y, Liu L.. 2021. Transcriptome analysis reveals a potential role of benzoxazinoid in regulating stem elongation in the wheat mutant qd. Frontiers in Genetics 12, 623861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Xu H, Lantzouni O, Bruggink T, Benjamins R, Lanfermeijer F, Denby K, Schwechheimer C, Bassel GW.. 2020. A molecular signal integration network underpinning Arabidopsis seed germination. Current Biology 30, 3703–3712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Yang C-Q, Fang X, Wu X-M, Mao Y-B, Wang L-J, Chen X-Y.. 2012. Transcriptional regulation of plant secondary metabolism. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 54, 703–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Yuan C, Li C, Yan L, Jackson AO, Liu Z, Han C, Yu J, Li D.. 2011. A high throughput barley stripe mosaic virus vector for virus induced gene silencing in monocots and dicots. PLoS One 6, e26468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Zhai Y, Li P, Mei Y, Chen M, Chen X, Xu H, Zhou X, Dong H, Zhang C, Jiang W.. 2017. Three MYB genes co-regulate the phloem-based defence against English grain aphid in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 68, 4153–4169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Zhang B, Horvath S.. 2005. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 4, 17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Zhang F, Wu J, Sade N, et al. 2021a. Genomic basis underlying the metabolome-mediated drought adaptation of maize. Genome Biology 22, 260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Zhang L, Zhang L, Xia C, Gao L, Hao C, Zhao G, Jia J, Kong X.. 2017. A novel wheat c-bZIP gene, TabZIP14-b, participates in salt and freezing tolerance in transgenic plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Zhang L, Zhang L, Xia C, Zhao G, Jia J, Kong X.. 2016. The novel wheat transcription factor TaNAC47 enhances multiple abiotic stress tolerances in transgenic plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 6, 1174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Zhang L, Zhao G, Jia J, Liu X, Kong X.. 2012. Molecular characterization of 60 isolated wheat MYB genes and analysis of their expression during abiotic stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 203–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Zhang Z, Lan H, Cao H, Hu X, Fan Y, Song Y, Wu L, Liu TX.. 2021b. Impacts of constitutive and induced benzoxazinoids levels on wheat resistance to the grain aphid (Sitobion avenae). Metabolites 11, 783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Zhao Y, Cheng X, Liu X, Wu H, Bi H, Xu H.. 2018. The wheat MYB transcription factor TaMYB31 is involved in drought stress responses in Arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 1426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Zhou P, Li Z, Magnusson E, Gomez Cano F, Crisp PA, Noshay JM, Grotewold E, Hirsch CN, Briggs SP, Springer NM.. 2020. Meta gene regulatory networks in maize highlight functionally relevant regulatory interactions. The Plant Cell 32, 1377–1396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Zhou S, Richter A, Jander G.. 2018. Beyond defense: multiple functions of benzoxazinoids in maize metabolism. Plant & Cell Physiology 59, 1528–1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

erac204_suppl_supplementary_figures_S1-S6
erac204_suppl_supplementary_tables_S1-S10

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article and its supplementary data published online


Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES