Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Cytopathol. 2021 Nov 30;130(4):284–293. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22537

TABLE 4.

Correlation of Malignant Cases With RAS Mutations

Histologic Diagnosis Age, Range, y Sex, No. Procedure, No. Tumor Site, No. Tumor Size, Range, cm LVI, No. Molecular Alteration, No.
PTC (n = 14)
 FV (n = 10) 23–69 F = 6 T = 4 RS = 7 1.7–6.3 Focal = 3 HRAS alone = 3
M = 4 L = 6 LS = 3 Ext = 1 HRAS with others = 3
NRAS alone = 1
NRAS with others = 2
KRAS with others = 1
 Other (n = 4)a 34–60 F = 4 T = 2 RS = 4 0.8–3.4 NRAS alone = 2
L = 2 NRAS and MIR = 1
KRAS and MIR = 1
FTC (n = 4) 33–71 F = 4 T = 3 RS = 3 2–7.9 Focal = 1 KRAS alone = 1
L = 1 LS = 1 Ext = 1 NRAS and MIR = 3
HCC (n = 2) 53–58 F = 2 T = 2 RS = 2 0.8–1.5 Focal = 1 NRAS and MIR = 1
NRAS and GEF = 1
PDTC (n = 1) 66 F T LS 4.8 Ext NRAS and TERT

Abbreviations: Ext, extensive; F, female; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma; FV, follicular variant; GEF, gene expression profile; HCC, Hürthle cell carcinoma; L, lobectomy; LS, left side; LVI, lymphovascular invasion; M, male; MIR, miRNA classifier; PDTC, poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; RS, right side; T, total thyroidectomy.

a

Includes cases with mixed features (follicular and solid features; n = 1), classic variant (n = 1), and papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (n = 2).