Table 1.
Patient-specific factors | |
Critical illness | Vd ↑ |
CL ↑ or ↓ based on renal function or RRT settings | |
Residual renal function | CL ↑ compared to anuric patients |
Hypoalbuminemia | Free drug concentrations ↑ |
CL ↑ for highly protein bound drugs | |
Vd ↑ | |
Drug-specific factors | |
Solubility | Hydrophilic drugs more likely to be affected by RRT-related CL |
Lipophilic drugs potentially affected by membrane adsorption | |
Molecular weight | CL ↑ for low molecular weight drugs |
This may not be a major determinant of drug removal due to the use of high flux hemofilters with large pore size | |
Protein binding | CL ↑ for low protein bound drugs |
Electric charge | CL ↑ for anionic antibiotics (e.g. cefotaxime and ceftazidime) compared to cationic antibiotics (e.g. aminoglycosides) retained in plasma by negatively charged molecules like albumin (Gibbs–Donnan effect) |
PK/PD target | RRT-related CL influences maintenance dose for time-dependent antibiotics (e.g. 100%fT>1–4 × MIC) |
RRT-related CL influences dosing frequency for concentration-dependent antibiotics (Cmax/MIC) | |
RRT-related CL influences maintenance dose and/or dosing frequency for time- and concentration-dependent antibiotics (AUC/MIC) | |
RRT-specific factors | |
RRT modality: Continuous versus Intermittent | Variable elimination rates depending on intra and inter-dialytic phases for IHD |
Relatively constant drug CL depending on RRT intensity for CRRT | |
RRT technique: Convective versus Diffusive | Higher CL of high molecular weight drugs with convection technique |
Combining convection and diffusion (i.e. CVVHDF) often results in greater drug CL than by convection or diffusion alone at equal RRT doses | |
Effluent flow rate | Higher CRRT effluent rates resulting in higher CL |
Blood flow rate | CL ↑ with high blood flow rate |
Negligible clinical impact for CRRT | |
Dilution mode | CL ↓ in pre-dilution mode |
Negligible clinical impact | |
Membrane type/adsorption | Polyacrylonitrile membranes more likely to be associated with drug adsorption (e.g. amikacin, levofloxacin, echinocandins in particular) |
Saturable effect | |
Hemofilter life span | CL ↓ over time unless circuit components are replaced regularly |
Down time | CL ↓ if prolonged circuit downtime |
AUC area under the concentration–time curve, CL clearance, Cmax maximal drug concentration during a dosing interval, CRRT continuous renal replacement therapy, CVVHDF continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration, IHD intermittent hemodialysis, MIC minimum inhibitory concentration, RRT renal replacement therapy, PK/PD pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics, Vd volume of distribution