Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 23;11(17):3226–3237. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4686

TABLE 2.

Clinical and molecular characteristics of 2009 EGFR‐negative NSCLC cases tested for ALK and ROS1 fusions and MET ex14 skipping mutation

Characteristic Number of cases
Age, median (range) 63 (16–85)
Women 629 (31.3%)
Smoking status
Ever‐smoker 407 (52.5%)
Never‐smoker 368 (47.5%)
Unknown 1234
Histology
Adenocarcinoma 1731 (99.0%)
Squamous 12 (0.7%)
Other 4 (0.2%)
Not specified 262
ALK translocations 107 (5.3%)
EML4‐ALK (E13;A20) 49 (45.8%)
EML4‐ALK (E20;A20) 14 (13.1%)
EML4‐ALK (E6;A20) 41 (38.3%)
EML4‐ALK (E18;A20) 3 (2.8%)
ROS1 translocations 44 (2.2%)
CD74‐ROS1 (C6;R34) 23 (52.3%)
EZR‐ROS1 (E10;R32) 2 (4.5%)
EZR‐ROS1 (E10;R34) 5 (11.4%)
SDC4‐ROS1 (S2;R32) 3 (6.8%)
SLC34A2‐ROS1 (S13;R32) 7 (15.9%)
SLC34A2‐ROS1 (S4;R32) 1 (2.3%)
TPM3‐ROS1 (T8;R35) 2 (4.5%)
TPM3‐ROS1 (T10;R35) a 1 (2.3%)
MET ex14Δ 31 (1.5%)
a

This variant was initially detected as TPM3‐ROS1 (T8;R35) by real‐time PCR analysis, but further was correctly identified as TPM3‐ROS1 (T10;R35) by Sanger sequencing.