Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 30;12:927685. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.927685

Table 2.

WALT 2022 recommendations for PBM in managing salivary gland dysfunction in cancer patients - updated from Heiskanen et al., 2020 (78).

Ref. Patient population Treatment Intent Study design PBM Treatment Parameters Efficacy
Route of delivery Wavelength (nm) Laser type Approach Power(mW) Irradiance(mW/cm2) Time(sec) Fluence (J/cm2) Photon Fluence (p.J/cm2) Einstein(E)
Gonnelli 2016 (108) HNC P RCT Combo 660 +780 + clinical care InGalAlP IO
(660 nm)
40 Calculated:1000 10 10 19 4.2 Yes, objective outcome measures
EO
(780 nm)
15 Calculated:375 10 3.8 5.7 1.3
Palma 2017 (110) HNC T Before-and-after Combo 808 InGalAlP IO 30 750 10 7.5 11.2 2.5 Yes, objective and subjective outcome measures
EO
Saleh 2014 (111) HNC T RCT Combo 830 GaAlAr IO 100 3570 20 71 106.5 23.7 Not effective in both objective and subjective outcome measures
EO
Simoes 2010 (112) HNC P Comparative Intraoral 660 AlGaInP IO 40 Calculated:1111 6 6 11.4 2.5 Yes, subjective outcome measures
Cowen 1997 (71) Hematologic cancer P RCT Intraoral 632.8 HeNe IO 60 Calculated:150 10 1.5 3 0.7 Yes, subjective outcome measures

intra-oral; EO, extra-oral; HNC head and neck cancer; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; P, prevention; Ref, reference; RCT, randomized controlled trial; T, therapy

1 Einstein = 4.5 p.J/cm2 which is the photonic fluence at 810 nm that is equivalent to the conventional fluence of 3 J/cm2 (62).

Photon Energy at 632 nm = 2 eV and 660 nm = 1.9 eV, 780 = eV, 808 = 1.5 eV, and 830 nm = 1.5eV.