Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 13.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep;115(9):1412–1428. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000734

Table 1.

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation quality criteria

Quality of evidence Study design Factors lowering the quality of evidence Factors increasing the quality of evidence
High Randomized trial Study quality: Strong association:
Moderate −1: serious limitations + 1: strong, no plausible confounders
Low Observationalstudy −2: very serious limitations +2: very strong, no major threats to validity
Very low Any other evidence −1: important inconsistency + 1: evidence of a dose response gradient
Directness: + 1: allplausible confounders would have reduced the effect
−1: some uncertainty
−2: major uncertainty
−1: sparse or imprecise data
−1: high probability of reporting bias