High |
Randomized trial |
Study quality: |
Strong association: |
Moderate |
|
−1: serious limitations |
+ 1: strong, no plausible confounders |
Low |
Observationalstudy |
−2: very serious limitations |
+2: very strong, no major threats to validity |
Very low |
Any other evidence |
−1: important inconsistency |
+ 1: evidence of a dose response gradient |
|
|
Directness: |
+ 1: allplausible confounders would have reduced the effect |
|
|
−1: some uncertainty |
|
|
|
−2: major uncertainty |
|
|
|
−1: sparse or imprecise data |
|
|
|
−1: high probability of reporting bias |
|