Table 2.
Statement | GRADE quality | Strength of recommendation |
---|---|---|
We suggest that patients with obstructive esophagealsymptoms without a mechanicalcause should undergo HRM for evaluation of esophageal motility disorders | Very low | Conditional |
We recommend HRM over conventional line tracing manometry forthe diagnosis of esophagealmotility disorders in patients with obstructive esophagealsymptoms | Moderate | Strong |
We suggest utilization of supplementary/provocative maneuvers with the HRM protocolto improve the diagnostic yield of esophagealmotility disorders in patients with obstructive esophagealsymptoms | Low | Conditional |
We suggest the inclusion of a barium tablet with a barium esophagram during the evaluation of obstructive esophagealsymptoms | Very low | Conditional |
We suggest the use of FLIP to complement HRM forthe diagnosis of esophagealmotility disorders in patients with obstructive esophageal symptoms and borderline HRM findings. | Low | Conditional |
We suggest that the EGJ and gastric cardia anatomy should be inspected endoscopically and/or radiographically to assess for mechanical abnormalities in patients with esophagealsymptoms after antireflux surgery | Very low | Conditional |
Please refer to the text for detailed discussion and evidence regarding each of the recommendations.
EGJ, esophagogastric junction; FLIP, functional lumen imaging probe; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; HRM, high-resolution manometry.