Table 6.
Structural model results (hypotheses testing)
Hypothesis | B-values | S.D | T-values | P-values | Supported | R2 | Q2 | f2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | MBBP − > ITABT | 0.238 | 0.056 | 4.251 | 0.000 | Yes | 0.462 | 0.231 | 0.081 |
H2 | MBBP*ATSM − > ITABT | 0.026 | 0.045 | 0.583 | 0.281 | No | 0.158 | 0.026 | |
H3 | EPB − > ITABT | − 0.010 | 0.046 | 0.212 | 0.416 | No | 0.101 | ||
H4 | EPB*ATSM − > ITABT | 0.371 | 0.076 | 4.861 | 0.000 | Yes | 0.013 | ||
H5 | OSWBP − > ITABT | 0.091 | 0.055 | 1.650 | 0.0510 | Yes | 0.014 | ||
H6 | OSWBP*ATSM − > ITABT | − 0.087 | 0.051 | 1.729 | 0.043 | Yes | 0.011 | ||
H7 | FSFBP − > ITABT | 0.107 | 0.050 | 2.148 | 0.017 | Yes | 0.012 | ||
H8 | FSFBP*ATSM − > ITABT | 0.176 | 0.075 | 2.342 | 0.011 | Yes | 0.014 | ||
H9 | ATSM − > ITABT | 0.144 | 0.071 | 2.016 | 0.023 | Yes | 0.477 | 0.009 |
N = 79; MBBP, maintenance barriers of biogas plants; FSFBP, financial support for biogas plants; EPB, economic and policy barriers; OSWBP, owner satisfaction with biogas plant; ATSM, awareness through social media; ITABT, intention to adopt biogas technology
(*), the moderating relationship indicated by the asterisk among the variables