Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 13;30(5):11838–11860. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22894-0

Table 6.

Structural model results (hypotheses testing)

Hypothesis B-values S.D T-values P-values Supported R2 Q2 f2
H1 MBBP −  > ITABT 0.238 0.056 4.251 0.000 Yes 0.462 0.231 0.081
H2 MBBP*ATSM −  > ITABT 0.026 0.045 0.583 0.281 No 0.158 0.026
H3 EPB −  > ITABT  − 0.010 0.046 0.212 0.416 No 0.101
H4 EPB*ATSM −  > ITABT 0.371 0.076 4.861 0.000 Yes 0.013
H5 OSWBP −  > ITABT 0.091 0.055 1.650 0.0510 Yes 0.014
H6 OSWBP*ATSM −  > ITABT  − 0.087 0.051 1.729 0.043 Yes 0.011
H7 FSFBP −  > ITABT 0.107 0.050 2.148 0.017 Yes 0.012
H8 FSFBP*ATSM −  > ITABT 0.176 0.075 2.342 0.011 Yes 0.014
H9 ATSM −  > ITABT 0.144 0.071 2.016 0.023 Yes 0.477 0.009

N = 79; MBBP, maintenance barriers of biogas plants; FSFBP, financial support for biogas plants; EPB, economic and policy barriers; OSWBP, owner satisfaction with biogas plant; ATSM, awareness through social media; ITABT, intention to adopt biogas technology

(*), the moderating relationship indicated by the asterisk among the variables