Abstract
Dental caries is considered to be the most common pathology of the oral cavity. The pathogenesis of dental carries is believed to be because of imbalance in the microbiological niche creating an ecological pressure. Probiotics are living microorganisms which when dispensed in appropriate amounts can benefit the health of the host. They have posed as a promising replacement to antibiotics that can aid in solving dental issues like dental caries. There are numerous Randomized control trials to validate this fact. There are also various modes through which a probiotic can be delivered against dental caries. Numerous new avenues like effector strains and synbiotics are also explored nowadays. The present review is about the significance of probiotics in the management of dental caries.
KEYWORDS: Caries, effector strains, prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics
INTRODUCTION
Lately, the oral cavity has been proposed as a pertinent target for probiotic applications. Present day researches have proved that an equilibrium between favorable and disease-causing bacteria determines the oral health of the pro-individual. The past decade has seen the exploration of products bearing probiotic as a likely substitute for oral health therapy.[1] Biofilm forming on the oral hard tissues and soft tissues is contemplated to be the principal causal agent in periodontal problems and caries which are considered as the most common pathological conditions of the oral cavity.[2]
It is well versed now that diseases like caries and periodontal diseases emerge due to environmental disturbances to the oral habitat. This has been summed up in the 'ecological plaque hypothesis.[2] Ecological plaque hypothesis proposes that minimal pathogens causing caries may be present or may be transmitted in the oral biofilm determines oral health. Any loss of equilibrium in this biofilm-producing changes in local environment leads to an increase in pathogens causing dental caries. A carbohydrate-rich diet, reduced salivary flow, and low salivary pH are some of the changes cumulatively termed as “ecological pressures”.[2]
Pathogens that compete with the indigenous microflora in an ecological pressure situation approach numerical dominance levels required for occurrence of the disease. This concept strengthens the recent definition of dental caries to be a complex disease. The endogenous rather than exogenous pathogenic species are primarily associated with its development. The number of endogenous organisms remarkably rises in an intraoral environment favorable to them. Hence, prevention of caries can be achieved by two methods: (A) by directly targeting the potential pathogen and (b) indirectly by hindering “the ecological pressure” of the responsible pathogen selection.[3]
Probiotics have posed as a promising substitute to antibiotics that can be effective against oral diseases such as periodontal disease, halitosis, and dental caries which are related to an imbalance in the microbiota. For the probiotics to act, several methods have been proposed, namely competitive exclusion, direct and indirect interaction.[4] This review attempts to explore the importance of probiotics in preventing or controlling dental caries.
Dental caries
Dental caries is considered to be the most common chronic multifactorial disease affecting the mineralized structure of the teeth in oral cavity. The susceptibility to this disease persists throughout.[2] The factors involved in the formation of dental caries are nutrition, oral hygiene maintenance, fluoride, and the cariogenic bacteria colonization, which attributes to the food intake, cultural practices, socioeconomic status, and lifestyle.[5] The host-related risk factors are salivary flow and its buffering capacity, teeth position in relation to their neighbors, surface enamel characteristics, and occlusal fissures topography on posterior teeth.[6,7,8] Bacteria in their communities within the dental plaque accumulated on the tooth surface cause tooth structure demineralization and destruction leading to dental caries.[1] The primary bacteria involved in the formation of caries are Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli spp.[9] Inside the biofilm, carbohydrates ferment into organic acids as metabolic by-products lowering the pH levels which leads to tooth structure demineralization.[10]
S. mutans is a pivotal pathogen in the formation of dental caries due to its ability to produce biofilms. Conversion of sucrose to the extracellular polysaccharides like glucans is crutial for biofilm formation.[11] This metabolic step relies on the various surface proteins which take part in the production of the extracellular glucan matrix are glucosyltransferases (GtfB, GtfC, and GtfD). Whereas growth of the biofilm is contributed by surface proteins like glucan-binding proteins by the bacterial interaction with extracellular glucan.[12,13,14]
Aas et al.[15] have proved that species of Lactobacillus, Atopobium low-pH nonpremutans streptococci, Propionibacterium, Actinomyces, Bifidobacterium, and Veillonella and not only S. mutans and Lactobacilli spp can be attributed to the pathogenesis of dental caries.
Probiotics
Probiotics are defined as “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host.”[16] Probiotics promote health by secretion of antimicrobial compounds, biosurfactant production which inhibits epithelial surface adhesion, degradation of toxin, lowering blood cholesterol, host's immune system, competing for nutrients and adhesion sites, and vitamin synthesis stimulation.[4]
The oral health of an individual is determined by the balance between the beneficial and pathogenic bacteria. This makes the oral cavity a valid target for the application of probiotics.[2] The bacterial biofilm produced on the hard and soft tissues is implicated for various pathological conditions such as dental caries and periodontitis.[17] It has been observed that dental caries is not caused by a specific bacterium but by a group of bacteria sharing common physiological characteristics. It is the imbalance in the oral environment and facilitation of the pathogenic group of bacteria which leads to various infectious pathologies.[17] This is the target area where probiotics come into play. Probiotics act in the oral cavity either by direct interaction, indirect interaction, or competitive exclusion. Under direct interaction, the probiotics inhibit the addition of pathogens, become an integral part of the biofilm, and produce cytoprotective proteins on the host cell surface. The probiotics indirectly interact with the pathogenic bacteria by enhancing host immunity, regulating mucosal permeability, and affecting nonimmunological defense mechanism of the host. The probiotics also compete with the pathogens by producing inhibitory molecules against them and competing for the bonding sites.[4]
Probiotics and dental caries
To reap the beneficial effects of probiotics in keeping dental caries at bay, it must attach to tooth surfaces and hence amalgamate into the dental plaque. It should inhibit the proliferation of cariogenic bacteria by competing and antagonize the cariogenic bacteria. Moreover, the probiotic should lower acid production by metabolizing dietary carbohydrates.[2]
Many investigators studied the effect of probiotic species like Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DSM 9843, Limosilactobacillus reuteri ATCCPTA 5289 and L. reuteri ATCC 55730 on various caries forming pathogenic bacteria. L. reuteri ATCC PTA 5289 and LGG demonstrated the highest inhibitory activities whereas others showed some degree of inhibition of S. mutans proliferation and plaque formation.[18,19,20]
Coaggregation abilities of Lactobacilli species are also attributed towards the prevention of colonization of bacteria responsible for caries and dental plaque formation.[21] S. mutans adhesion incredibly decreased when probiotics like Lacticaseibacillus casei, L. rhamnosus GG, Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 and L. reuteri were incorporated in an in vitro system before S. mutans. These probiotics altered the protein composition of the salivary pellicle creating an artificial biofilm on hydroxyapatite that specifically prevents the adherence of S. mutans.[22] Similarly, probiotic strains such as CMS1 and CMS3, belonging to Weissella cibaria, which is a subtype of Lactobacillus also showed inhibitory effects on plaque formation.[23]
Coaggregation could be one of the manners in which probiotic averts and controls dental caries. Twetman et al.[24] and collaborators probed the coaggregation between probiotic bacteria and caries-associated strains. Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus GG, L. rhamnosus LB21, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. F19 and L. reuteri PTA5289 were the strains chosen from the commercial dairy products. Although all of them coaggregated with oral pathogens and compared to all strains S. mutans showed a higher capability than the other pathogens to coaggregate. L. acidophilus coaggregated better than other probiotic organisms. Studies on probiotic strains aim to recognize and distinguish species which can compete or antagonize Streptococci and other pathogenic bacteria with cariogenic potential.[24] Hasslöf et al. Their study suggested that selected probiotic strains have the potential to curtail dental caries by impeding the growth of S. mutans, but the extent of inhibition remains strain specific for the probiotic and for the pathogenic strain.[25] Salivary buffering capacity has also been observed to increase when healthy volunteers were given a probiotic tablet containing L. salivarius. LGG also believed to improve the salivary buffering Capacity.[26]
Various authors such as Gizani et al. in the year 2016, Ghasemi et al. in the year 2017, Koopaie et al. in the year 2019, Zare Javid et al. in the year 2020 and Ferrer et al. in the year 2020, performed randomized control trials to identify the role of various probiotics against dental caries. All of them were successful to identify caries reducing abilities of the candidate probiotics.[27,28,29,30,31]
There are many probiotic strains identified as potential candidates to be used for oral health. Table 1 summarizes the various candidates suitable to be used for the purpose.
Table 1.
Candidates designated as suitable oral probiotics
Genus | Species |
---|---|
Lactobacillus | Rhamnosus |
Reuteri | |
Casei | |
Paracasei | |
Achidophilus | |
Salivarius | |
Brevis | |
Bifidum | |
Bulgaricus | |
Sporogens | |
Thermophilus | |
Bifidobacterium | Animalis lactis |
Bifidum | |
Longum | |
Streptococci | Mutans |
Rattus | |
Oralis | |
Uberis | |
Dentisani | |
Salivarius | |
Bacillus | Coagulans |
Delivery of probiotics
Dairy products appear to be the most common vehicle for probiotic delivery. The colloidal nature of milk appears to be protective for animal enamel, due to the presence of various organic compounds and inorganic compounds which compensate the cariogenic challenges. Calcium lactate, its constituent off dairy product also have anti-cariogenic properties.[32] various dairy products which are ideal for probiotic delivery are whole milk, cheese, yogurt, add, and other allied products.[32]
It is a challenge to administer probiotics to those who are lactose intolerant or are allergic to dairy products. For them, various other means are identified. Capsule or liquid, store tablets, drops, lozenges, ice cream, and sweetened cakes are few other vehicles through which probiotics can be delivered.[32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]
Concept of effector strain
Effector strain is a nonpathogenic microorganism with the potential to colonize infection susceptible host tissues persistently pants hands hence preventing the invasion of pathogens into the host tissue. This is commonly been described as replacement therapy which aids prevention or cure of the disease. This can also lead to herd protection by the transmission of effector strain from one individual to another.[32] Certain S. mutans species with low acidogenic potential due to lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) deficiency and with the ability to produce certain bacteriocins could be used as effector strains.[40,41,42] LDH converts pyruvate to lactic acid during the glucose metabolism by cariogenic bacteria.[43] Whereas Bacteriocin has antimicrobial properties towards the close relatives of the effector strains.[44] Present day considers the effector strains therapy to be an integral part in caries prevention and treatment. However, a thorough investigation into the capacities of effector strains and its safety will guarantee its effectiveness in the clinical scenario.[32]
Concept of prebiotics and synbiotics
The term “prebiotics,” on the contrary, is used to describe “a selectively fermented ingredient that allows specific changes, both in the composition and/or activity in the resident microflora, that confers benefits upon host wellbeing and health.” The term “symbiotic” is applied to products containing probiotics and prebiotics.[32] Prebiotics are combined with probiotics to produce a symbiotic to enhance the probiotics's ability to outgrow pathogens. Various prebiotics which are evaluated as a suitable addendum to form Synbiotics combinations are glucomannan hydrolysates or 3% galactooligosaccharides and 1% fructooligosaccharides, Xylose, xylitol, arabinose, urea, arginine.[45,46,47,48,49] Undoubtedly, the concept of synbiotics in caries management has high promise. However, presently, it is in its very early stage of development. Further clinical trials to investigate their in vivo effect on the oral microenvironment, especially on dental plaque and its pH, are necessary to validate the idea.
CONCLUSION
Probiotics are established therapeutic and supplemental adjuncts for various Generalized and systemic conditions. Their role in dental caries prevention and treatment is an avenue which is explored properly in the last decade. The evidence of which is reflected in many randomized control trials. Effector strains and synbiotics are pioneer areas which may prove to be promising in caries prevention and treatment. The future requires multi-centric trials to validate the various combinations so that patients can reap the benefits of probiotics.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Lin TH, Lin CH, Pan TM. The implication of probiotics in the prevention of dental caries. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:577–86. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8664-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bizzini B, Pizzo G, Scapagnini G, Nuzzo D, Vasto S. Probiotics and oral health. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18:5522–31. doi: 10.2174/138161212803307473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fierro-Monti C, Aguayo-Saldías C, Lillo-Climent F, Riveros-Figueroa F. Role of probiotics as bacteriotherapy in dentistry: A literature review. Odontoestomatologí. 2017;19:4–13. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bustamante M, Oomah BD, Mosi-Roa Y, Rubilar M, Burgos-Díaz C. Probiotics as an adjunct therapy for the treatment of halitosis, dental caries and periodontitis. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2020;12:325–34. doi: 10.1007/s12602-019-9521-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hoceini A, Khelil NK, Ben-Yelles I, Mesli A, Ziouani S, Ghellai L, et al. Caries-related factors and bacterial composition of supragingival plaques in caries free and caries active Algerian adults. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2016;6:720–6. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Featherstone JD, Adair SM, Anderson MH, Berkowitz RJ, Bird WF, Crall JJ, et al. Caries management by risk assessment: Consensus statement, April 2002. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2003;31:257–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a microbial biofilm. Caries Res. 2004;38:204–11. doi: 10.1159/000077756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Struzycka I. The oral microbiome in dental caries. Pol J Microbiol. 2014;63:127–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Conrads G, de Soet JJ, Song L, Henne K, Sztajer H, Wagner-Döbler I, et al. Comparing the cariogenic species Streptococcus sobrinus and S. mutans on whole genome level. J Oral Microbiol. 2014;6:26189. doi: 10.3402/jom.v6.26189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kidd EA, Fejerskov O. What constitutes dental caries? Histopathology of carious enamel and dentin related to the action of cariogenic biofilms. J Dent Res. 2004;83:C35–8. doi: 10.1177/154405910408301s07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sato Y, Yamamoto Y, Kizaki H. Construction of region-specific partial duplication mutants (merodiploid mutants) to identify the regulatory gene for the glucan-binding protein C gene in vivo in Streptococcus mutans. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;186:187–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09102.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Banas JA, Vickerman MM. Glucan-binding proteins of the oral streptococci. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14:89–99. doi: 10.1177/154411130301400203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Duque C, Stipp RN, Wang B, Smith DJ, Höfling JF, Kuramitsu HK, et al. Downregulation of GbpB, a component of the VicRK regulon, affects biofilm formation and cell surface characteristics of Streptococcus mutans. Infect Immun. 2011;79:786–96. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00725-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lynch DJ, Fountain TL, Mazurkiewicz JE, Banas JA. Glucan-binding proteins are essential for shaping Streptococcus mutans biofilm architecture. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;268:158–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00576.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aas JA, Griffen AL, Dardis SR, Lee AM, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE, et al. Bacteria of dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in children and young adults. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1407–17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01410-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.FAO/WHO. Health and nutritional properties of Probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Evaluation of Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria. Córdoba, Argentina: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marsh PD. Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? Microbiology (Reading) 2003;149:279–94. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26082-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jiang Q, Stamatova I, Kainulainen V, Korpela R, Meurman JH. Interactions between Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and oral micro-organisms in an in vitro biofilm model. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:149. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0759-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Meurman JH, Antila H, Korhonen A, Salminen S. Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG (ATCC 53103) on the growth of Streptococcus sobrinus in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci. 1995;103:253–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1995.tb00169.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Söderling EM, Marttinen AM, Haukioja AL. Probiotic lactobacilli interfere with Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation in vitro. Curr Microbiol. 2011;62:618–22. doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9752-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Reddy R, Swapna L, Ramesh T, Singh T, Vijayalaxmi N, Lavanya R. Bacteria in oral health – Probiotics and prebiotics a review. Int J Biol Med Res. 2011;2:1226–33. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Haukioja A, Loimaranta V, Tenovuo J. Probiotic bacteria affect the composition of salivary pellicle and streptococcal adhesion in vitro. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2008;23:336–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00435.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kang MS, Chung J, Kim SM, Yang KH, Oh JS. Effect of Weissella cibaria isolates on the formation of Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Caries Res. 2006;40:418–25. doi: 10.1159/000094288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Twetman L, Larsen U, Fiehn NE, Stecksén-Blicks C, Twetman S. Coaggregation between probiotic bacteria and caries-associated strains: An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67:284–8. doi: 10.1080/00016350902984237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hasslöf P, Hedberg M, Twetman S, Stecksén-Blicks C. Growth inhibition of oral mutans streptococci and candida by commercial probiotic lactobacilli – An in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2010;10:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-10-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Glavina D, Gorseta K, Skrinjarić I, Vranić DN, Mehulić K, Kozul K. Effect of LGG yoghurt on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp. salivary counts in children. Coll Antropol. 2012;36:129–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gizani S, Petsi G, Twetman S, Caroni C, Makou M, Papagianoulis L. Effect of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri on white spot lesion development in orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:85–9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ghasemi E, Mazaheri R, Tahmourespour A. Effect of probiotic yogurt and xylitol-containing chewing gums on salivary s mutans count. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41:257–63. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.4.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Koopaie M, Fatahzadeh M, Jahangir S, Bakhtiari R. Comparison of the effect of regular and probiotic cake (Bacillus coagulans) on salivary pH and Streptococcus mutans count. Dent Med Probl. 2019;56:33–8. doi: 10.17219/dmp/99757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zare Javid A, Amerian E, Basir L, Ekrami A, Haghighizadeh MH, Maghsoumi-Norouzabad L. Effects of the consumption of probiotic yogurt containing Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 on the levels of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli in saliva of students with initial stages of dental caries: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Caries Res. 2020;54:68–74. doi: 10.1159/000504164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ferrer MD, López-López A, Nicolescu T, Salavert A, Méndez I, Cuñé J, et al. A pilot study to assess oral colonization and pH buffering by the probiotic Streptococcus dentisani under different dosing regimes. Odontology. 2020;108:180–7. doi: 10.1007/s10266-019-00458-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Amargianitakis M, Antoniadou M, Rahiotis C, Varzakas T. Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and dental caries. New perspectives, suggestions, and patient coaching approach for a cavity-free mouth. Appl Sci. 2021;11:5472. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Montalto M, Vastola M, Marigo L, Covino M, Graziosetto R, Curigliano V, et al. Probiotic treatment increases salivary counts of lactobacilli: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Digestion. 2004;69:53–6. doi: 10.1159/000076559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Caglar E, Cildir SK, Ergeneli S, Sandalli N, Twetman S. Salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli levels after ingestion of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 by straws or tablets. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006;64:314–8. doi: 10.1080/00016350600801709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chuang LC, Huang CS, Ou-Yang LW, Lin SY. Probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei effect on cariogenic bacterial flora. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15:471–6. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0423-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nishihara T, Suzuki N, Yoneda M, Hirofuji T. Effects of Lactobacillus salivarius-containing tablets on caries risk factors: A randomized open-label clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:110. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cildir SK, Sandalli N, Nazli S, Alp F, Caglar E. A novel delivery system of probiotic drop and its effect on dental caries risk factors in cleft lip/palate children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49:369–72. doi: 10.1597/10-035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Burton JP, Drummond BK, Chilcott CN, Tagg JR, Thomson WM, Hale JD, et al. Influence of the probiotic Streptococcus salivarius strain M18 on indices of dental health in children: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62:875–84. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.056663-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Caglar E, Kuscu OO, Selvi Kuvvetli S, Kavaloglu Cildir S, Sandalli N, Twetman S. Short-term effect of ice-cream containing Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12 on the number of salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli. Acta Odontol Scand. 2008;66:154–8. doi: 10.1080/00016350802089467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hillman JD. Lactate dehydrogenase mutants of Streptococcus mutans: Isolation and preliminary characterization. Infect Immun. 1978;21:206–12. doi: 10.1128/iai.21.1.206-212.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ikeda T, Iwanami T, Hirasawa M, Watanabe C, McGhee JR, Shiota T. Purification and certain properties of a bacteriocin from Streptococcus mutans. Infect Immun. 1982;35:861–8. doi: 10.1128/iai.35.3.861-868.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hillman JD, Johnson KP, Yaphe BI. Isolation of a Streptococcus mutans strain producing a novel bacteriocin. Infect Immun. 1984;44:141–4. doi: 10.1128/iai.44.1.141-144.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Brown AT, Wittenberger CL. Fructose-1,6-diphosphate-dependent lactate dehydrogenase from a cariogenic streptococcus: Purification and regulatory properties. J Bacteriol. 1972;110:604–15. doi: 10.1128/jb.110.2.604-615.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Reeves P. The bacteriocins. Bacteriol Rev. 1965;29:24–45. doi: 10.1128/br.29.1.24-45.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bijle MN, Neelakantan P, Ekambaram M, Lo EC, Yiu CK. Effect of a novel synbiotic on Streptococcus mutans. Sci Rep. 2020;10:7951. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64956-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Burne RA, Marquis RE. Alkali production by oral bacteria and protection against dental caries. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;193:1–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09393.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chen YY, Weaver CA, Burne RA. Dual functions of Streptococcus salivarius urease. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:4667–9. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.16.4667-4669.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Morou-Bermudez E, Burne RA. Analysis of urease expression in Actinomyces naeslundii WVU45. Infect Immun. 2000;68:6670–6. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.12.6670-6676.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nascimento MM. Potential uses of arginine in dentistry. Adv Dent Res. 2018;29:98–103. doi: 10.1177/0022034517735294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]