Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 13;22:747. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03439-z

Table 6.

Log-likelihood ratio tests for each regression nested model showed in Tables 3, 4 and 5

Cross-sectional analysis At follow-up
Frailty measured with the Frailty Index Frailty measured with the FTS5 Frailty measured with the Frailty Index Frailty measured with the FTS5
Regression results from Table 3
M2 vs M1 359.82*** 288.96***
M3 vs M2 318.80*** 323.05*** 294.07*** 255.98**
M4 vs M3 358.93*** 367.01*** 287.63*** 299.02***
Regression results from Table 4
M2 vs M1 263.48*** 269.01*** 270.07*** 277.27***
M3 vs M2 272.31*** 281.09*** 286.12*** 292.37***
M4 vs M3 288.82*** 295.72*** 290.69*** 297.99***
Regression results from Table 5
M2 vs M1 301.98*** 321.14*** 318.68*** 326.79***
M3 vs M2 310.45*** 333.37*** 335.09*** 341.20***

FTS5 Frailty Trait Scale 5, M Model

*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05