Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 13.
Published in final edited form as: Ergonomics. 2015 Oct 7;59(4):591–602. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1079335

Table 2.

Mean (SD) of the dominant (right) upper arm elevation estimates by measurement method.

Summary measure OMC_Global Accel-1 Comp-1 OMC_Torso ART
Mean (°) 13.5 (7.0) 13.4 (7.4) 13.2 (7.8) 20.7 (9.9) 21.3 (11.5)
Maximum elevation (°) 50.0 (7.9) 51.5 (8.6) 46.1 (10.0) 67.8 (11.9) 65.2 (17.8)
10th percentile (°)a −0.8 (2.1) −0.9 (2.0) 0.1 (2.7) 0.0 (1.9) 2.3 (3.9)
50th percentile (°) 8.4 (10.7) 8.6 (10.6) 10.0 (10.6) 15.3 (17.3) 18.2 (17.4)
90th percentile (°) 35.9 (8.8) 35.2 (10.8) 31.6 (10.6) 49.2 (12.7) 44.0 (14.4)
99th percentile (°) 45.1 (7.5) 44.4 (9.2) 40.0 (9.7) 59.9 (12.0) 55.5 (16.1)
Sample-to-sample RMSD (°) -- Ref -- 7.2 (2.9) 8.5 (2.4) -- Ref -- 12.1 (3.2)

Notes: OMC_Global = Low passed (zero-phase, 4th-order Butterworth, 10 Hz cut-off) OMC-based estimate relative to the global coordinate system; Accel-1 = Low passed (zero-phase, 2nd-order Butterworth, 3 Hz cut-off) accelerometer-based estimate from the IMU secured to the sternum only; Comp-1 = Complementary weighting algorithm-based estimate using accelerometer and gyroscope measurements from the IMU secured to the sternum only; OMC_Torso = Low passed (zero-phase, 4th-order Butterworth, 10 Hz cut-off) OMC-based estimate relative to the torso; ART = a complementary weighting algorithm-based estimate calculated as the difference of complementary-based estimates from the IMUs secured to the sternum and upper arm (shoulder relative to the torso).

a

Negative values denote extension behind the body.